Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You're welcome. Lots of people aren't sure where to post when they arrive but you'll get used to the forum. HB
    • I’m so sorry for posting in the wrong place and I am so thankful you have replied to me thank you.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our Retail Loss Prevention subforum for further advice. It sounds as if you may get letters from people like DWF solicitors or a company called Retail Loss Prevention but we always recommend to ignore them. If the police weren't called on the day you aren't going to hear from them. Ask us any questions you want to and keep in touch but I don't think this will go anywhere. Best, HB
    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

estellyn are those the changes in a bbc news article? where they still let you claim but will no longer get any money whilst awaiting assessment?

 

so basically making the reclaim rule that used to just apply to those reclaiming after not attending a WCA now affect anyone reclaiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 262
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What worried33 said. at the moment, following a failed esa appeal a person can reclaim as long as at least 6 months have passed from the original DWP decision. The change that is being brought in is that you can still apply, but unless your condition is significantly worse, or a different condition from the prior claim, then no esa will be paid while waiting assessment.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Working as a WRO I'm all too aware of the rubbish DWP are dreaming up, but unless they do actually implement the change you describe I will keep advising clients as I have done for some while. I stillthink the best bet would be to get your local CAB to make the app.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Working as a WRO I'm all too aware of the rubbish DWP are dreaming up, but unless they do actually implement the change you describe I will keep advising clients as I have done for some while. I stillthink the best bet would be to get your local CAB to make the app.

 

Well the situation depends on who is erroneously telling him that the 6 month rule applies from the appeal rather than the original decision. If it is a phone monkey on the helpline, then it doesn't matter, as they are poorly trained and don't properly understand benefit rules. If it is someone on the application line, then he just needs to be firm, insist they take his application and let the decision maker decide. If he doesn't succeed in getting the adviser on the application line to take the application (they have a duty to take the application unless the claim is still open) then yes, he will need to get some advocacy.

 

Yes, until the intended changes are made law, the current regs remain - unfortunately it's things like publicised 'intended' changes that confuse DWP workers.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a new claim for ESA on 12th of February.

 

I got a sick note from my doctor today from 19th until 13 weeks. For chronic anxiety, depression and asthma.

 

I failed my medical and tribunal last year, My original medical was 9th of July 2014 and decision 23rd July. My tribunal was 26 november 2014.

 

I now spoke with ESA today about an advance payment as they basically left me high and dry without a penny and they said my claim would need to go to a decision maker because it's within 6 month of having same illness. But Citizens advice and my representative at my tribunal are adamant that the 6 month is from the medical decision. I keep telling esa and they just say we pay the benefits and we know better basically.

 

What do i do . I am so stressed out with everything that is going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I applied for a budgeting loan on my old esa claim and was accepted before they closed that claim and they awarded me £190 today and told me ill get the money in 3 days, So hopefully that will tide me over until my ESA is fixed properly.

 

A bit of a relief for the time being, Been a horrible 2 months so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I admire your optimism Estellyn.

Here is what Pcombo has managed to do for himself in the last 7 days.

Called DWP/ESA on 12 Feb and made a new claim for ESA same day.

Phoned ESA again on 16 Feb. Discussed eligibility for making a new claim.

Spoke to ESA again today, 19 Feb. Discussed status of claim. Told it was sent to Decision Maker.

In the meantime managed to negotiate a loan and obtained a sick note for 13 weeks.

Now I don't regard myself as non-compos mentis (no second opinions please) but I would be hard put to to sort all that out in a week.

The other point I don't quite get is what evidence was sent to the DM to determine or to support his claim for ESA if he didn't get his note from doctor until today. Bear in mind also that the DM will have all the evidence from his previous epic struggle.

Goes without saying I wish him all the best but I can't help wondering if he is not repeating the mistakes of his previous encounters and leaving himself wide open to similar charges of not being as poorly as he thinks he is, or would have people believe he is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage, the DM is not being asked to make a Work Capability decision, only a decision as to whether or not 6 months have elapsed since the 23rd July.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I can't help wondering if he is not repeating the mistakes of his previous encounters and leaving himself wide open to similar charges of not being as poorly as he thinks he is, or would have people believe he is.

 

Just curious what you mean by this what mistakes??? and what do you mean at the end like I have money or something and im making out im without a penny??, Lucky i stay with my parents and im not living alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I admire your optimism Estellyn.

Here is what Pcombo has managed to do for himself in the last 7 days.

Called DWP/ESA on 12 Feb and made a new claim for ESA same day.

Phoned ESA again on 16 Feb. Discussed eligibility for making a new claim.

Spoke to ESA again today, 19 Feb. Discussed status of claim. Told it was sent to Decision Maker.

In the meantime managed to negotiate a loan and obtained a sick note for 13 weeks.

Now I don't regard myself as non-compos mentis (no second opinions please) but I would be hard put to to sort all that out in a week.

The other point I don't quite get is what evidence was sent to the DM to determine or to support his claim for ESA if he didn't get his note from doctor until today. Bear in mind also that the DM will have all the evidence from his previous epic struggle.

Goes without saying I wish him all the best but I can't help wondering if he is not repeating the mistakes of his previous encounters and leaving himself wide open to similar charges of not being as poorly as he thinks he is, or would have people believe he is.

 

You need to remember that the people he is speaking to on the helpline have a poor understanding of ESA regs. The decision maker, however does understand, and should make the right decision. There was no need really to call about eligibility a few days after making the claim - except to worry himself by getting incorrect information from the helpline. I know it's difficult not to 'worry in advance' but it doesn't help anything. He knows nothing until the decision maker makes a decision on his claim - something that can take 2 - 4 weeks or more on a standard uncomplicated claim such as his. As long as a med cert is provided along with the new claim, I don't see an issue yet.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

By 'mistakes' I meant that mistakes appear to have been made in ignoring the evidence that you said your doctors etc provided. The Tribunal is obliged to take into account any evidence provided by your doctors. You say that was not done, that was a mistake on somebody's part.

You say nobody of the people advising you advised you about your right to demand a full explanation, that was another mistake on somebody's part.

You can't now deny that mistakes have been made when you spent the past 9 months since last May insisting on it.

 

By 'poorly' I meant ill. A common enough term in Yorkshire where I've lived for many years. I forgot that in Scotland 'poorly' may mean something else.

 

I made no comments insinuating that you have money or that you were making out without a penny.

 

Luckily, as you say, you stay with your parents and you are not living alone. A minor point that I don't believe you mentioned over 9 months.

Several times over the months you stated that you could not cope in social situations.

 

On 30 November 2014 you wrote in a post that you don't or can't speak to people. You said;

 

"It's December almost I'm stuck with no money, no benefit".

 

I would regard that as an assertion of being 'poorly' as you would use the word.

 

You also said;

 

"My entire life is upside down with NO SUPPORT from anyone".

 

Not quite the 'lucky' situation that you now claim to enjoy. Maybe you could clarify what version you would have people accept or believe, or perhaps this is all another 'mistake'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pcombo - Have you ever wrote to the Tribunal Court and asked for copies of both the Judges Notes and Statements of Reasons?

 

This may shed more light on why they refused you.

 

Stigman

Edited by Stigman
Did not put a capital C in Court

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pcombo - Have you ever wrote to the Tribunal Court and asked for copies of both the Judges Notes and Statements of Reasons?

 

This may shed more light on why they refused you.

 

Stigman

 

Yeah, I've got the statement here and it annoyed me more to be honest. It basically said I exaggerated my disability with self interest on securing benefits, Which is a complete lie and nonsense and annoyed me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made an application for a short term benefit advance today via ESA. Now there is more dates to the confusion.

 

The decision maker said refused to give me the advance payment because 6 month apparently hasn't passed from the date hes saying 15th august until 15 february, I made my claim on the 12 th february for esa under same illness. But the first 7 days of ESA are self certified and you dont get paid for that only when you get a sick line from the 7th/8th day in my case the 19th of february. So surly by that logic that's been 6 month past. Even though citizens advice told me it's 6 month from the original decision on esa which happened on 23rd of july.

 

I got a scottish *funny enough im scottish :p* advisor to send an email with all my queries to decision makers to actually give me a call and discuss it. I finally got someone who helped me and went out there way to try there best than just fobb me off by saying "well we pay your benefit we basically know better, bye".

Link to post
Share on other sites

The decision date that counts is the one on the letter telling you you've been refused esa following your ATOS assessment.

 

Where is the DM getting the august date from ?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

The decision date that counts is the one on the letter telling you you've been refused esa following your ATOS assessment.

 

Where is the DM getting the august date from ?

 

Yeah, thats when i got my mandatory reconsideration decision, Which states the disallowance of ESA from the 23rd of july. And the letter for that was dated the 20th but apparently the decision was made on the 15th of august.

 

There really annoying me and playing with all these dates... Due to make a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, thats when i got my mandatory reconsideration decision, Which states the disallowance of ESA from the 23rd of july. And the letter for that was dated the 20th but apparently the decision was made on the 15th of august.

 

 

Wait, what? I must be misreading here - the DWP is telling you that the decision to stop your ESA was made three weeks after the letter informing you of that decision was sent?

 

Or is the DM arguing that the relevant date is that of the Mandatory Reconsideration? If so, he's wrong.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE REGULATIONS 2013

Section 27(4)

 

(4) A claimant is to be treated as not having limited capability for work where–

 

(a) it has previously been determined, within the six months preceding the date of claim for employment and support allowance, on the basis of an assessment under Part 5 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013, that the claimant does not have limited capability for work; and

 

(b) it appears to the Secretary of State that-–

 

(i) the determination was not based on ignorance of, or mistake as to, a material fact; and

(ii) there has been no relevant change of circumstances in relation to the claimant’s physical or mental condition since the determination.

This would suggest that a claimant may be treated as having limited capability for work 6 months after the date of the last assessment. In which case then said claimant would be entitled to claim ESA from that date.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So i spoke with a decision maker today and he explained to me the 15th of august date. So in august while waiting for my mandatory reconsideration i was told i could make a new claim of esa for a different condition, so i thought after looking at my sick note that it only had 2 illnesses stress and anxiety, But i told atos i suffer from asthma as well. So i got a sick line with asthma only and made a new claim for asthma which apparently got disallowed on the 15th of august with NO payment ever giving to me. So i began to get payments from my local council like a emergency fund which has nothing to do with DWP and i didn't start getting esa until september until they got my appeal notice.

 

So they refused to give me an advance payment and no doubt will disallow my new claim based on a claim from the 15th of august which got disallowed and i didn't even get assessed on. How can they do this, this isn't right that they are using a newer claim to refuse me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...