Jump to content

hessey50

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi I seemed to remember some time ago there was a case where the Council tried to prosecute a claimant for not telling them of a non relevant change which made no difference to the claim. I wondered if anyone remembered it?
  2. No he didnt he merely got a university exemption student number that the local council accepted as him being a full time student I provided this to them and that was that, He had documentation that he was not liable, I stated he was living with me and yes they do, I worked for the local council and they did. its not he has to provide a landlords address, its he has to provide status as exempt to landlord or parents once post 18 and electoral role after 16, despite them not having a vote.
  3. My son is a full time university student and as such an "unperson" re council tax, lived at home till recently moved out but may return later depending on his study path all the time to date he has been a full time student. Despite to their knowledge my only getting pension income I get an annual "check" form the Council who have got very excited as to exactly what date he left stopping benefit though now reissued, A long time ago I seem to remember a case re having not promptly advised housing benefit of something that made no difference as in this case: not a counted adult as a student and not a counted adult as not there and if he returned would still be not counted I would simply send them the usual Council Tax form from the uni. He get a tuition fees loan and has access to student loan funding, they clearly have accessed his bank or tax records after they were informed he wasn't at my address Anyone remember or have thoughts on this?
  4. will do cheers its the implied bit I missed thinking it had to be specific doc mentioned thanks again done the acknow on line
  5. Struggling a bit to find much to put in for request as by simply ignoreing my notice before action response they are cutting out the pre court protocols cobbled this up "Prior to the issue of proceedings I had responded to your “Letter Before Action” of 08/02/2023 as required under the Pre Action Protocol for Debt Claims as per Civil Procedure Rules1998 (CPR) which was signed for at the required address 11.33 Friday 03 March 2023. This letter was written in order to query, as per your instruction, matters relating to your claim. I requested clarification as to the authority of UK Search to act and if they were the agent or owner of the debt, invoices for supply covering the period any reductions made to comply with the low income and vulnerable policies in force and compliance with the “Paying Fair Guidelines” Despite the requirements of the CPR no response has been received. Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of each of the following documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim being: A copy of all invoices and any associated items for the claimed period including any additional charges billed separately
  6. Ok read it wrong then Apart from quoting the legislation the only documents listed are "unpaid Invoices" that does not give much to ask for and help with a defence
  7. Having a senior moment the link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ is repeated twice but dont see a specific utils one it says use it but seems to be same link?
  8. Thanks for support I have sent the response acknowledgeing service electronically and am getting the utility data request ready to send I suspect that having had no reply to my data request in response to the Letter Before Action sent recorded I may get no response to this as well. I may have misread the rules regarding pre court protocols but they would appear to say that a Court Claim can be issued only after 30 days after the Letter Before Action request for data has been responded to? Once again thanks in my 70's I am not as sharp I was
  9. Name of the Claimant ? Southern Water sols Ward Hadaway Date of issue – 03 may 23023 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The Claimants Claim is for unpaid Invoices relating to the supply of water and or sewerage provided to the defendant at xxxxxxxxxx for the period from 1/04/2012 to 31/03/2023 2. The claimant is a Statutory water and sewerage undertaker pursuant to the Water Industry Act 1991 with the claim due and payable under s142-144 of the act and the Claimants charges scheme. 3. The defendant failed to pay the said sums on the due date or at all 4. The Claimant claims interest pursuant to s819849 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% p.a. on the sum of £3260.29 from the due claims to the date of issue totalling £20.59 and until judgement or sooner payment at £0.71 per day Claimants claim £3260.29 What is the total value of the claim? £3565.86 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes responded to requesting details no response Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Water When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? No agreement claim starts 2012 Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?None Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears” or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? As far as aware none paid What was the date of your last payment? None Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No claimform.pdf
  10. Sent off response to letter of claim as per pre action protocols recorded and confirmed receipt asking for details of claim and why this suddenly is raised covering a period from 2012 to 2023 As expected no response but today got County Court Claim I thought a response was required to try and avoid court proceedings but this seems to be a Court claim mill solicitor
  11. not moved 20 years had loads of debts but all dealt wit upload.pdf
  12. Letter before action from ward hadaway states southern water ref and uk search ref and amount no details how amount was arrived at uk search letter says water supply arrears I am not in their supply area and pay another company
  13. Looks totally different to preview think last response answers but lets try this: Old car hp agreement properly terminated by section 99 notice "debt" sold on to various DCA On receipt of letters before action send copy notice and admission from lender they "chose to ignore" notice Nothing heard for a while then back to above now however its since 2009 that "debt" is supposed to have been accrued I think that while they could keep attempting to recover the non existent debt now having never ever acknowledged "debt" I can tell them that as it would be statute barred anyway I have no intention of any further contact and require them to cease all activity
  14. Just trying to get this clear in my head, old car purchase properly terminated via section 99 sold on to various DCA usually gets to letter before action send copy notice and lenders admission they ignored notice see you in court it goes away for goodly while has just resurfaced ( with massive discount on alleged amount) but it is now since 2009 when the first alleged debt was claimed. As I understand it all the time the DCA contacts me and to avoid going to court I respond saying I do not acknowledge debt here is proof they can keep passing it around trying. Now if I say that I have no intention of effectively wasting my time as its out of time anyway have never acknowledge the alleged debt and have no intention of ever doing so they should stop?
  15. "The court has issues a warrant to that address". The court issues civil warrants to a Person or Company at the address given by the plaintiff often the last known address if the person or company is not there repeat visits are not likely because it wastes the Bailiffs time and is against the collection protocols as in this case the Court has been advised by the Bailiffs superior that the address for service is incorrect and the matter has been returned to the plaintiff, the breach of collection guidelines is ongoing. Its not morality its law.
×
×
  • Create New...