All Activity
- Past hour
-
In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself. Along the way they
- Today
- Yesterday
-
I need to keep this simple. To keep stress levels down. I'm still embroiled in other legal stuff. I seem to remember the friend broker saying I shouldnt have to issue a court claim - he thought I could lodge a claim to the Ombudsman? Is that a possible route? Without going down a possible 2y legal claim path
-
dx100uk started following Final Charging Order Information required.
-
Final Charging Order Information required.
dx100uk replied to Lunacy's topic in Financial Legal Issues
please copy and paste the relevant text from your deeds regarding this. (use the .gov.uk site ONLY if you dont have a copy) i suspect this is a restriction k, which means you don't need to pay anything to anyone and never did!... even if you sell your jointly owned home , you don't have to pay anything anyway other that the buyer writes to LR the home is now mine and the Rest k is thus removed. who was the original creditor? debtor? you mean claimant - who was? who are? seems to me you are being had blind... dx -
your 1st port of call is to complain to savills then issue a letter of claim, then onto a court claim.. HOWEVER, going by the FOS guidelines, 3yrs from when you realised you could 'complain', IMHO it would be thrown out. i don't doubt for one minute you are owed money, but i can see straight off that as soon as you raise a complaint, savills with buff you off quoting the 3yrs mate to late. for the price of a 2nd class stamp it can't hurt.
-
I would guess the claim is - £170 + £20.20 interest = £190.20 £35 court fee £50 legal representative's fees £275.20 total. So legit and you don't need to alter your WS. If things go wrong with the Dartford e-mail address tomorrow you can always send by snail-mail. Make sure you put a paragraph in your WS that you are respecting the court's deadline for WS service but you are yet to receive one from the Claimant.
-
stu007 started following Tenancy agreement woes (ForHousing)
-
Hi I have to fully agree that if you only signed that Salford Council Tenancy Agreement some 20 yrs ago and no other Agreement since then your Salford Council Tenancy Agreement is still in force and can't be superceded by ForHousing quoting from there own Agreement. So ForHousing Housing Officer is wrong in what they have stated to you and need to be corrected as they can't enforce there own tenancy agreement clauses for there own tenancy agreement when you Tenancy Agreement was with Salford Council and signed at that time with no new Tenancy Agreement Signed. Just for info even if ForHousing insist that you sign a New Tenancy
-
sorry i was confusing the name with an earlier one, they arent related. but they are a DCA and a DCA is not a BAILIFF and have ZERO powers on ANY debt - no Matter what it's type. only the owner of a debt can take anyone to court, not some powerless DCA merely chasing for 'their client' and i will guess DRA does state their client is EON.Next.? EON could reopen the claim, but it's very rare if they were the ones that sent you the N279 to discontinued it. from what period is you old Npower debt from please? there are well documented issues with npower and faulty billing software you say it's now +£3k, b
-
So - do you mean 6y from when they organised the loan? Because that's more than 7y. Or is it 6y from when I was advised what they'd (most likely) done wrong? Because that's under 6y Or is it 3y from when I was advised what they'd (most likely) done wrong? Because the 3y expired start 22. I seriously wasn't happy but I didn't know they'd done anything seriously wrong/ unethical until a friend - who is a broker - had a look at all the papers in March 19. He then said I should send them a SAR. Which I did. Which is when/where they admitted some of the things they did wrong. If I can "do something" - what actually do I do?
-
US elections November 2020
tobyjugg2 replied to honeybee13's topic in The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
This is the clever bit i think She is quite reasonably requiring trump to detail the efforts he made, as his representation is claiming he made all reasonable efforts - he'll be required to detail what he offered ... .. as an aside, can you imagine jed the burglar saying - I made all efforts to get bond - but as I'm broke I couldn't - so i shouldn't need to post bond other than my word - tell you what, heres the $1.50 I have in leu of my $500 bond. -
Tony P started following Son's 2 Speeding NIP's - In two places at the same time ?
-
My very uninformed view is that, although in post #1 you/your Son consider the first is a "fair cop", both police and motorist must have followed procedures correctly, which appears not to be the case. Assuming it is the same police authority/office, they appear to have been procedurally incorrect somewhere. That is not good policing but more importantly, they should not prevail in such circumstances. Establishing procedural impropriety usually ends a case straight off. In these circumstances, not being someone to meekly "roll over and think of England" I would fight the situation to ensure everything had been correct before admitt
-
yes i merged them. now you've made another post... we are unpaid volunteers and sometimes have little time. ......................... correct is should do though off-setting is not the right word. not removed, paid off, which they were by the latter application of the credit to your account. .,....... look at it this way you changed supplier (by default out of your control) the new supplier showed you as having 'a debt' on their inherited account. you later got confirmation from the previous supplier there was no debt. the new supplier credited your account to the same value. matter
-
US elections November 2020
tobyjugg2 replied to honeybee13's topic in The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
seems more and more unlikely any of Trumps building assets are in a state to be offered as bonds - already wrapped up in god knows what so worthless for bond underwriting - not such much of an issue for letitia trump seems to be just trying to force delays until the election and he can just wrangle it all from presidential power or hope for an insurrection when he loses. hope the capital guards and police have orders to fire on any armed or rioting rabble this time. Gas and tasers to start with - backed up by armed military -
US elections November 2020
tobyjugg2 replied to honeybee13's topic in The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
rumours, rumours Elon Musk describes meeting Trump at mutual friend's Palm Beach house for 'breakfast' where ex-president did 'most of the talking' but did NOT ask for an endorsement or cash | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK The billionaire Tesla CEO, 52, insisted that Trump didn't ask for an endorsement, but said that he may offer one down the 'final stretch'... That'll be another billion of musks down the pan -
I've just been re-checking a few things before issue. I noticed that the claim on the MCOL website is £275.20 made up as shown below. The wording in the WS refers to £170.00. It allegedly increased from £170.00 from Final reminder before legal action to £275.20 when the claim form was issued on 19th October 2022. I also do not see the £170.00 mentioned in this last breakdown (unless a portion of interest has been added)? Do I need to amend my statement or leave as is? Amount Claimed £190.20 Court Fee £35.00 Solicitor Costs £50.00 Total Amount £275.20
-
US elections November 2020
tobyjugg2 replied to honeybee13's topic in The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
Just imagine it cant you Trumps latest idiot who wont get paid: Hello, I'm looking for someone to offer bond of £578M, plus the don wants 100m for himself Bond/insurance company: Ok, That'll be £70M upfront fees, £10M a week until its paid off and are what you offering as bond to the bond - deeds to property worth over a billion or what? Trumps latest idiot who wont get paid: The word of the Don Bond/Insurance company: You have a txt. click. -
Apologies that my last post was so long. I did enter it as 4 smaller posts but the website merged them. So just to re-iterate OVO has not removed the first and since update Migration Account Balances. I raised the Migration Dispute which was settled concluding a net credit of £732.57 What I am hoping is that you could tell me, where I have got something wrong. Currently I can not see it. I believe that OVO is off-setting my account credit. (please take a look at the attached file) Or even worse are off-setting 3 of the Government Energy Payments plus some of my account credit. Thanks. Offse
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.