Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP! Jet2 Refused our return flight half way through our holiday due to cabin crew false allegations.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friend and I were traveling to Crete Rethymon on the 21st of June 2015 with Jet2 from Glasgow airport. We were meant to return with them on the 28th of June 2015 to Glasgow airport.

 

We bought 4 miniature bottles of vodka at duty free. When we were on our flight, my friend opened one of the miniature, one of the cabin crew said that we were not allowed to consume it on the flight. We apologised and handed the miniatures to the cabin crew to be locked away until we departed our flight. We were then asked if we would like drinks from the trolly, we ordered food and some alcoholic beverages.

 

Another air stewardess came over to us with a bad attitude and handed us a rather threatening letter. She asked for our passport details. We then asked why we were asked for our details as we did not want to be put on some sort of data base.

 

The air stewardess began to raise her voice, threatening us, that if we did not hand over our details she was going to get the pilot and that the police would be waiting for as when we land. We did not refuse to give our details, we simply asked what they were going to be used for.

 

My friend asked her to lower her voice as it was drawing attention to us.

 

We gave our details to another air stewardess who apologised for her colleagues behaviour, she also told us that we would be able to fly with Jet2 on our return flight and not to worry. (I have a voice recording of this conversation).

Half way through our holiday on the 24th of June 2015, we received a phone call informing us that we were being refused to flu home with Jet2 due to a report which had been filed by cabin crew that we continued to drink our own alcohol and displayed aggressive behaviour.

 

These allegations are untrue and frankly quite frightening that Jet2 staff can make up such lies leaving their customers stranded in a foreign country.

 

 

I have sent numerous emails to Jet2 asking for the situation to be fully investigated and I have sent the voice recording as evidence that no aggressive behaviour was displayed by my friend and I. Jet2 just said that it has been fully investigated which we know that it has not. We feel that our voice has not been heard.

 

 

We had to cut our holiday short by returning home on 27th June 2015 with EasyJet flying from Heraklion airport to Edinburgh which caused us further expense. We paid approx £400 for alternative flight, thats not including the expensive phone bill of £50 for phoning Jet2, bus and taxi expenses to travel to the airport, or having to cut our holiday short which also ruined our holiday.

 

Lastly we both experienced much stress in regards to how we would get home. This has put me off flying again, as it appears that customers do not have any rights, and how easy it is for staff to make up lies leaving passengers in foreign countries. (I have a copy of all email correspondence, voice recording aboard the flight with a member of cabin crew, we also have a photo of the threatening letter which we received on board.

 

Help would be much appreciated as we are looking for compensation, an apology, and for cabin crew to be dealt with appropriately in order for this to not happen to anyone else.

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the complaints process, using the relevant ombudsman service. Do that before you even think about issuing a court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Conniff, thank you for your reply it is much appreciated. I get where you are coming from, I would probably think the same thing if it hadn't of happened to me. I can only write what happened and it is for this reason that I want to take it further. We all hear about passengers who display abusive behaviour on flights, but I am certainly not abusive by any means, I am probably the softest person anyone could meet, that's why I can't believe that a company would file a false report which feels that we have nowhere to turn for help, so was hoping that this forum could give me some insight and guidance. Thank you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also have you addressed your complanit in writing to the complaints department? If the answer is yes, TRY the CEOS office instead :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the email that I sent to the executive chairman of Jet2. With the response below.

 

My email

 

I would like to take the opportunity to make an official complaint and it to be fully investigated as any serious complaint should. I have attached a recording of a conversation on the flight in which Mr C has been allegedly accused of aggressive behaviour. You will find that this conversation did NOT display any kind of abusive behaviour that has been reported by cabin crew member on the Jet2 flight which took place on Sunday 21st of June 2015. The recorded conversation was between Mr C, E (cabin crew) and myself. This is the very last conversation we had with the crew in relation to the consumption of alcohol on board who advised we would have the miniatures returned to us when we departed the plane in which they were. It is also evident during the recording that we both complied with cabin crew instructions and did NOT continue to consume our own alcohol (4 miniature bottle of vodka bought from duty free) the bag contained the receipt that showed we only purchased 4. We had already apologised for the misunderstanding that we had no idea that you were unable to consume the miniatures purchased at duty free as had been told at duty free shop you were able to do so. We handed them to cabin crew until the end of the flight so fully complied with what we had been asked. Cabin crew then asked us if we would like to purchase alcohol from the airline trolly, in which we did along with a toasted baguette and crisps. We were then informed by another cabin crew member (K) that we should not have been served alcohol and the cabin crew would be reprimanded for selling us alcohol. I offered to return the purchased alcohol for a full refund in which (K) advised this would not be necessary. It appears that there was misleading and conflicting information submitted during this flight by the crew members. I also made the crew member aware that the conversation was being recorded as we had been spoken to in abrupt manner by the previous flight attendant who advised us she was the duty manager(K).

 

Please also find attached the letter which we had received after cabin crew had already retrieved the miniature bottles and received an apology from both Mr C and I. This type of letter is unaccepatable to be handed when it does not fit the situation in any form.

 

Furthermore it states in a previous email sent by Chris F (please refer to emails sent below) that we disobeyed cabin crew instructions not to drink our own alcohol and when our passports were requested aggressive behaviour was displayed by Mr C which is also false information. Mr C had asked why they needed our passports and would the information be recorded on a database? Due to human rights and data protection, Mr C had every right to ask where his personal information would be recorded and for what use. The email also states that Jet2 have a zero tolerance approach to aggressive behaviour and it is for that reason that we were refused travel on our return flight. This has been extremely upsetting allegation and this is why we would require a full investigation to prevent further passengers receiving this treatment and ruining other holidays. We were not even refunded for our flights, and had to cut our holiday short by flying with a difference airline at a far greater expense due to this. We have been told on numerous occasions that a report has been filed confirming aggressive behaviour and yet we have asked for a copy of this on numerous occasions but have yet to receive this.

 

If these allegations were to be true, then why were the police not informed to meet us after our arrival on the flight to Crete Heraklion airport? Why did we continue to be served alcohol on board? Why were we told and the recording confirms this that the recording of passport details were for a "slap on the wrist"?

 

As you can imagine, both Mr C and I were shocked upset and spent the further days trying to resolve this issue under great stress. Receiving a call from Jet2, informing us that we could not fly back home with Jet2 on our return date Sunday 28th June 2015 due to alleged misconduct upon our flight on Sunday 21st of June 2015. During numerous conversations by phone to Jet2, Mr C had asked if we were banned from flying with Jet2 for our return home, where he was informed that he could book again on the with Jet2 on Sunday 28th June 2015. Mr C had then asked if we could have confirmation of this via email so that we could not be refused flight at arrival. We were refused email confirmation of this, which makes me think that this is some sort of money making scheme.

 

In conclusion both Mr C and I would like to give Jet2 one last opportunity to rectify this situation through compensation, firstly for false allegations, ruined holiday, flights and additional flights and a expensive phone bill at Mr C expense to Jet2 plus the stress and inconvenience that this matter has caused us both. we would also like an investigation into the duty manager for submitting untrue reports as would never like any other customer to go through this. I find this a reasonable request if you still feel that the allegations are true we have no option to take this matter further.

 

I look forward to your detailed response with a copy of the false report.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

Response

 

Thanks for your message, I am sorry I cannot help you. I know that Chris F has investigated and unfortunately confirmed that we are not able to

change this decision.

 

Yours sincerely.

Edited by honeybee13
Names removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, can't help you. will just add that a friend who works on a different airline as a stewardess mentioned in conversation a year or 2 ago that even the slightest disagreement with a passenger must be reported as aggression to the airline.

Perhaps its the same for the airline you used? Disagreement about your own drinks, so therefore reported as agression?

 

You could make a SAR for the airline report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you p3t3r, any help is great. We never disagreed about our own drink. We just asked why our passports were needed and were they going to put us on some sort of register after there had not been a problem as we handed our miniatures to cabin crew and apologised. We are disputing the fact that a false report was submitted with false allegations which resulted in refusal on our return flight xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

cynical... since this happened to you and what a friend said in conversation a long time ago, i am wondering whether this process is being used by airlines, to encourage their staff to make a report against passengers for aggression when the fact is that there was a minor overlook on rules and certainly no aggression.

 

possibly a money making exercise to clear seats to make way for other passengers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

p3t3r that was exactly what I said to my friend, the hole thing was weird, even my friend turned round to me on the flight and said that he was waiting for someone to jump out and say that we had been punked lol. We have had support from people who know us, but alot of other people have jumped to conclusions thinking that there was more to it, which I probably would to, I think the airline companies know that. Just hate to be made out to be something that I'm not, and I would never treat anyone the way we have been xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scott1981

 

Have you actually checked Jet2 Terms & Conditions? http://www.jet2.com/terms

 

Specifically look at this link: http://www.jet2.com/terms#23 and have a good read but specifically

 

Read all specifically 23 to 24 inclusive.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply stu007. Yes I read the terms and conditions when I returned from my holiday, but as I have said, there was no aggressive behaviour displayed at all, and we apologised in regards to the miniatures bought at duty free and handed them to cabin crew. It is the false allegations made within the report which was submitted. It looks like airlines can just make up false reports and refuse flights as they know that people will not believe the passengers which appears to be the case. They are just going to get away with it as people are quick to judge and jump to conclusions xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
It's a shame that customers don't have terms and conditions which state that cabin crew should not file false reports lol xx

 

 

Hi,

 

Reading with interest your comments about Jet2.

 

My wife had exactly the same issue earlier in the year with Jet2. She was livid.

 

I've helped her with letters x3 to Jet2 requesting copies of the report etc., but they don't have the decency to reply.

 

Just wondering what you are planning to do, county court action? - That's the way we're looking to go. Just wondering if you have plans? - seems that Jet2 are pretty good at stopping people from travelling for no real reason!

 

Regards,

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stevietoon_69

 

Welcome to CAG

 

You may not get a reply as the OP hasn't been back since there last post in July.

 

If you want to let us know more about your specific issue to get any more advice please start a new thread

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

I contacted CAA, Holiday Which and other authorites but no one wanted to help and just fobbed me off. I got my story published in the paper with recorded evidence that there was no aggressive behaviour displayed, Jet2 decided to ignore that to. People are very judgemental and always tend to believe the lies given out by large companies, so they can do and say as they please. I can't afford legal action so I've had to just let it go. Good luck and I hope you win your case. Let me know how you get on xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Steve,

I contacted CAA, Holiday Which and other authorities but no one wanted to help and would just fob me off. I also contacted the CEO of Jet2 who just ignored me. I eventually got my story published in the papers with recorded evidence that there was no aggressive behavior but Jet2 continued to ignore that to. I just found that it was a waste of my time fighting it as there was no help and people are very judgmental and rude. It appears that it is ok for companies to make up lies about customers. I can't afford legal action so I've just let it go. I wish you all the best and hope you win your case, please let me know how you get on if that it ok xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...