Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just ignore it, have you moved home since taking out the debt?
    • Fart: “Boorish cartoon misogynist.” “Cheeto-dusted cartoon villain.”      Michael Cohen says he used to be ‘knee deep in cult’ of Trump as he stands firm in fiery cross-examination ‘Knee-deep in the cult’: Michael Cohen holds his ground against Trump’s attorneys WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Trump’s attorneys want to undermine the former ‘fixer’ after damning testimony connected him to a criminal hush money scheme   Doesn't nodfathers lawyers/fans realise that anything they say about cohen being a crim reflects mostly on the guy he was crimming for? aka Trump LOL
    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caravan Blackhorse - Caravan HP problems.refund issues..**WON VIA FOS**


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Our model caravan is not on their site and we thought they were making a customised front towing cover, but it is a universal one and not unique to our brand of caravan. We emailed them last Thursday and again this morning.

I was doubtful on the DSR., but as we wanted to return it within 2 days of delivery I thought we might get away with it. We stupidly listen to their persuasions to keep it and try it plus being told we could not return it anyway. Surely their return policy on a universal cover is unlawful? They state;

Unfortunately, the nature of our product means we cannot offer our customers a returns policy. In addition, if your cover has already been put into production, you may not cancel your order. If however, in the unlikely event that your cover is faulty, we will arrange for your cover to be collected and repaired, altered or replaced. If you have a query regarding your cover, you can contact our sales team on 01943 864 646 or alternatively email us at [email protected]

Surely they cannot state the above on a universal fit? If you check on here you can see the tailored one in the middle which is what we expected if the universal one was not suitable. We would have gladly paid the extra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

seems like their claiming every cover is made to order! 28day delivery so seems to bear that out.

how that would stack up with DSR for a universal fit may require a test in court!!!!

Could try trading standards or consumer direct? for opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like their claiming every cover is made to order! 28day delivery so seems to bear that out.

how that would stack up with DSR for a universal fit may require a test in court!!!!

Could try trading standards or consumer direct? for opinion.

 

On my email to them, I gave them 7 days which expires today so if nothing by close of play today, I will contact Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

If in the wrong forum please move to the appropriate forum. Thanks.

 

In May 2011 we purchased a front towing cover for our caravan. This prevents stone chips on the front of the caravan from stones being thrown up when travelling. We had to supply them with details of the caravan etc indicating that the cover was made especially for our type of caravan.

On arrival and before fitting the first thing I noticed that there were no see through panels for the front lights and reflectors. I contacted them immediately to complain and was given a story that the lights could be seen through the material. At the time I did not think of the reflectors which I now believe are a legal requirement on a trailer.

I told the company that we were unhappy with our purchase and that as it was within the 7 days under the DSR I wanted to cancel. I was told that as per their terms and conditions we could not as the cover was made specially for the caravan. Unfortunately I foolishly accepted this and it was only later I found out that the front towing cover was a universal fit.

During the summer we were towing in the daylight and had no issues, however now that the days are short and murky, we have discovered that on a murky day the lights are not really visible and of course the reflectors cannot be seen. At light the lights are a subdued glow, but again no reflectors visible.

We are of the opinion that the front towing cover is not fit for purpose under SOGA as it doesn't comply with the laws of the land as a trailer should have the front lights clearly visible along with the front reflectors. The cover was purchased using a debit card. What sort of action can we take now? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops sorry that should be May 2012. Thanks for pointing it out.

 

I am wondering if this would be the applicable clause that I could use to raise a dispute;

 

Restrictions on the obscuration of certain obligatory lamps and reflectors19. Every vehicle shall be so constructed that at least part of the apparent surface of any–

(a)front and rear position lamp,

(b)front and rear direction indicator, and

©rear retro reflector,

which is required by these Regulations to be fitted to a vehicle is visible when the vehicle is viewed from any point directly in front of or behind the lamp or reflector, as appropriate, when every door, tailgate, boot lid, engine cover, cab or other movable part of the vehicle is in a fixed open position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can you send a dealer a SAR asking for all information with regards to vehicle you bought from them brand new? Actually in this case the vehicle is a caravan suffering from damp and we want to find out if they carried out a damp test at the previous service in November last year plus we need to know some other information regarding the caravan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not relevant a SAR relates to Personal Data only not the item purchased.

 

This is what I thought, however wouldn't all paperwork relate to the owner of the caravan and as that is personal date surely it can be requested. After all, we paid for the work.

We now suspect that the dealer never did a proper service and damp test on the service last year resulting in a serious damp issue which may have affected the structural integrity of the caravan. We need this report if we decide to reject the caravan under SOGA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think the Data Protection Act 1998 has any provision for this, the only item that could possibly be produced is the invoice for the work done, it cannot provide proof that it was actually carried out.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refer to the definition of personal data here - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/section/1.

 

You can only request stuff that relates to you as an individual - not things about the car.

 

The only way to force it would be to sue the dealer in county court and request the information as part of the disclosure stage of litigation (though not guaranteed the court would order you should get it).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried looking up problems with this particular caravan model or dealer? Do you have any paperwork related to the test? I can't see that SAR would help. You could have an expert look at it to see if it has been properly maintained or if it was faulty to begin with. Or ask the manufacturer, if they are still in business.

 

If you want to reject the goods then you should do just that and not do anything at all.

 

I don't know how old the caravan is or the circumstances so it's hard to say what you should do without knowing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

We have two deposit refund queries.

 

The first relates to a £200 deposit placed for an order for a new caravan.

This transaction was done over the phone about a month ago using a credit card.

 

At the very last moment we had to cancel the order due to an unexpected change of circumstances

although the dealer had taken delivery of the new caravan which was not built specifically for us.

 

Can we claim back the deposit?

 

Regarding the same caravan,

we also placed an order for £279 over the telephone about a week ago for a Phantom tracker to be installed tomorrow.

 

We phoned this morning to cancel the installation and were told that there would be a £25 call out charge

as the time was already booked by the fitter who is an individual acting on behalf of the tracking company and not employed by them.

 

Can they impose this £25 charge as they will not be attending the caravan?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi surfer01

 

For both transactions,

 

The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013

apply:-

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/265898/consumer-contracts-information-cancellation-and-additional-payments-regulations-2013.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must confirm your cancellation by email or letter. Your cancellation is probably not effective unless this is done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer

 

The Distance Selling Regulations have been superseded by The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013, the main changes are:-

 

  • The payment point must be unambiguously prominent and clearly labelled so that it is absolutely obvious to the consumer that placing the order entails an obligation to pay
  • You must deliver goods within 30 days, unless the consumer agrees otherwise
  • More extensive pre-contract information must be given or made available to the consumer
  • The cancellation period will be 14 calendar days, rather than the existing 7 working days
  • If you fail to provide the required pre-contract information regarding cancellation, the customer’s cancellation period is extended by 1 year, rather than by the existing 3 months
  • You must provide the consumer with a specific model cancellation form (set out in the Regulations) which they can use if they want to (but they do not have to) to cancel the contract
  • You can withhold a refund until you have received the goods back, or the consumer has at least provided evidence that they have returned the goods – this is a benefit for traders as you cannot currently legally do this
  • You can deduct some monies from the refund for diminished value if the goods have been excessively handled – another benefit for traders
  • You cannot require a consumer to use a premium rate telephone number to contact you about their contract, any post-contract consumer helpline must only be at basic rate.

Post 3 has been amended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel. The deposit was paid over the phone at end of May 2014 for delivery 24th June and no mention of no refund if contract is cancelled. I had to chase them for the paperwork to show that I had paid a deposit. Eventually they emailed me a copy but with no T & Cs. Seems that I have good grounds for the refund.

Now the sad part. Sometime in the future I probably would like to deal with them as they do offer good deals and the sales people are generally helpful. Unfortunately an unexpected change in personal circumstances forced us to cancel at the last minute, but hopefully this is only temporary and hopefully the dealer will not give us a hard time about the refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Regarding the deposits, we have had a refund back from Phantom less £25 as they state that is what they have to pay the fitter for the cancellation. Can they do this?

The caravan dealer has failed to respond and refund the £200 deposit although we followed up the verbal cancellation with a cancellation email. They do not have my signature on any piece of paper and when we made the payment, they never enclosed any T & Cs because they never posted any paperwork to us. When we did not receive any paperwork from them regarding the payment, we chased them up and they emailed a copy of the top page of the order and nothing else. On this form it does state that the deposit is non refundable, but I was not made aware of this fact.

On the top and only page copy of the order there was the equivalent of a VIN number on it for the caravan, however at a later stage we discovered that the caravan was a demonstrator model. They then got hold of another factory fresh caravan but never sent any paper work to show the change of VIN number.

I am not too sure what my next step is as dealer is not responding to emails but in all fairness emails are addressed to salesman who took the original order. Should I send them a recorded letter by snail mail requesting refund as on 26th July it will be 30 days since I advised them in writing via email of the cancellation. This is in addition to the verbal cancellation on the 24th June or should I invoke section 75 although 120 days have not passed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...