Leakie
-
Posts
945 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Leakie
-
Thanks Andy for moving the thread sorry if it was not the correct way to ask. Leakie
-
Hi BA I would have done that in the first place, if I had the funds available, I am at the bottom of the pile financially any spare income is being used, at the moment, on another repayment plan. there will only be £25 spare from September. As I have already stated the Council Recovery department are aware, of my position. The Extra 3 X £75 will mean the council will not receive any contribution to what is owed for 2 1/2 months. I will probably end up doing a DRO, then they will all lose out, but I would rather pay the council direct. With regards to Newlyns, I will point out there failures to obtain extra that they were not entitled too. Also Ace couriers part as well these were not a priority. But I have a feeling it will not get any where. leakie
-
Ok Update Newlyns have handed back to the council, It has now been re assigned to Rossendales. received the NoE's yesterday, all seem to be correct apart from one but I think it is a miner detail. I will contact them soon to try and sort out an agreement, I know this will not be accepted as will not be paid off quick enough. or just too much wanted in weekly payments and will fail. So we will be back to square one where I will have to wait it out again. I have nearly finished one agreement with the council, finishes in September. so hope they will bring one of the LO's back The council are fully aware of my position, they have had enough financial info to know it is pointless sending it out to a new company. My only worry is the old car 52 plate Peugeot 307 need it for getting to work, if that is taken then no payment can be paid as loss of work. Also my parents own it and I use it tax and insure, purchased in January from a dealer. Leakie
-
Thanks Colin 11 Just looked at one that states that a LO was taken out "A Liability Order has been granted against you on the (date) for non payment of Council Tax and costs at Various properties" could not see the date of required action but found it on the back of the NoE. leakie
-
I just want to get clarification I have read through the stickies provide by BA And if I am correct the NoE must have certain information on them. Date of NoE The amount owed, The added fee/s Date where an agreement for payment /payment plan must be agreed by. I would also think the address where the Lo was gain from. if any of this info is missing is it still compliant? and does a correct NoE have to be sent? I am not trying to find loopholes. just want to be clear. Leakie
-
I was unfortunately involved with the SS, due to my wife having a mental breakdown, The children were in care for 10 months. The School my children were in lied through there teeth. I even told the SS what was going to be in there next report , 1 month before the next meeting. As said record everything, this is your proof. My proof came from notes at contact, As I made sure I asked the children the right questions. Worked in my favour, but the nothing said about there lies. If you have move away from the area , I would let sleeping dog lie and move on. It will not help you with your depression. I can understand the anger, I have been there, good luck Leakie
- 23 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- civil
- county court
- (and 2 more)
-
Thank you for that Grumpy I understand what you are saying, Good to get an opinion from an expert on the ground, as such Shame most EA's are not the same as you and HESO
-
Thanks Grumpy for your reply, I know the police would not always just accept a receipt. Just to give an example Family struggling financially, The old car becomes beyond economical repair, They need a transport, for getting to work etc Parents buy the car from a dealer, but let them use it, until they get back on there feet. So the debtor has transport, but they must tax and insure how would that work out. What I am trying to say it is not always black and white. Can you give your view on this Grumpy as you are an EA
-
So what if that is the case a receipt can not be proof in any legal case so what is the point of a receipt. in legal terms The police accept this as proof of payment and ownership. So the Ea should accept this as well Can not be the case one or the other in law not both
-
BA case number 1 If there is a receipt for the payment of the vehicle, made by some one else ( not the debtor ) Why would the owner of the vehicle, have to prove if they taxed and insured the said vehicle. The proof of payment should be enough. the keeper of the vehicle is responsible, for tax and insurance. so surely a receipt should be enough. And if a receipt can be produced as proof of ownership why should it have to go through the courts to accept who the rightful owner is, The receipt should be enough proof Seems to me that it has been swayed to much in the the favour of the EA. If the proof of payment had been presented to the EA, and the took the vehicle away. It should be reported to the police as a theft? Leakie
-
I have already done that, #The school accept his is ill, apart from the doctor confirming it. #this is the stumbling block. no proof. But it is the council who are the one's I have more of a problem with. All they seem to want to do is threaten me, Lost count how many doctors and Hospital appointments he has had. The main problem is no one with commit that he is fit for school or not. as they are still trying to find out what is wrong. Everything takes time, (so far 6 months) The schools hands are tied with regards to school work, if he is not fit for school he is not fit to do school work at home. Looks like I will be invited to another meeting, (under caution again) What would happen if I did not accept the caution, or refused to speak at the meeting. Just want him sorted and back to school he has suffered with these head aches for so long now. The doctor has only given him a mild anti depressant.
-
Hi BA good advise as per usual, I think you will find the OP is not in contact with her husband, this was the reason she tried to make an arrangement
-
That is just nick picking DB ok £750 to £5000 Thought you are better than that!!!!!!!
-
Not wanting to argue I did not mention Charging orders. The stat demand may be free but to make some one bankrupt does cost the creditor to take it before the judge, if granted no guarantee they would recover what is owed,
-
You are partly correct DB over the bankruptcy the limit was raise from £700 to I believe £5000 to make a debtor Bankrupt, Also the creditor would have to pay a hefty fee to commence Bankrupcy
-
Hi CD I have a LO out with Newlyns this I think is from August last year, I did ask the council to bring it back after I set up a payment plan for another LO but in reply it was ignored. But saying that I have only had 1 visit at 5 am with a letter posted, and a few threats from Newlyn since.
-
As Martin2006 has already stated Get Gas Safe to check it out, If it is a problem and unsafe then this will help your cause, not only that if deemed to be unsafe and bad workmanship, then Gas safe will come down hard on the company and installer.
-
Well done Diddy1 Great result
-
I know we are guessing but it does smell of Capita I think you have hit the nail on the head BN. Zoltron I feel for you my wife tried the same may be a doctors letter to the council over her vulnerable situation but sent to the head of revenues may help leakie
-
Personalty I would have thought with the council admitting they had the wrong address, it should be brought back one step further Obviously Witsend .did not even know about the LO Council incompetence why should it even be with the EA after the admission.
-
The Local councillor definatley needs to be involved. They tend to get results quite quickly
-
Sorry for not updating My Son has seen an ENT consultant, then referred to Brain consultant, Looking like they are putting it down to Emotional Distress, But this is still to be diagnosed, I am waiting for the letter from the consultant to the Doctor. The school has now referred it back to MECE , They want me to prove he is not fit for school , How can I do that, I am not medically qualified. the Medical side has now nearly taken 5 months!! Family Solutions are now involved So have been referred to what was CAMS The lady said I could end up in court soon if my son does not attend or I can not prove his fitness. Gettting to the end of my teather now just do not know which way to go.
-
I am sure the back room council tax staff are Capita. I think this was stated in a thread a while back. If you pay online or telephone payment they can not refuse.
-
He stated in post 22 that he had been paying the EA direct, EA did not answer, so payment was not made. passed to 2nd EA paid between January to May, same thing happened, 3rd EA will not reinstate the plan, and threatened OP with Committal if he does not pay. I think that covers it so yes you are correct but because of reasons beyond his control is in the situation he is in now, This is why I advised to pay the council as EA 3 will not accept any payment apart from in full. Fees will still be covered even when paid to the council direct.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS