Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

FeDex CCJ Removal - CEO ignoring letters and Customer Service Dept refusing to help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2305 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I appreciate there is nothing I can do until Monday,

just typical that once I felt like I was getting somewhere and getting this resolved and sorted,

I come home to the shock of my life with an increased debt to now pay.

 

I will give the Courts a call on Monday

- can you tell me what they could achieve for me?

Would they warn of the HCEO and give me some time to get this sorted?

 

As you can tell this is really new to me.

I even ended up phoning a Bailiff Support Company this evening

and have taken all my information and will call me back tomorrow.

 

There is absolutely no way I can pay this,

I am a single parent and do not have that kind of money lying around.

I have supporting documentation for a set aside

and I assume I can talk to the Court about this as well?

 

My panic is that this has to be stopped by Wednesday,

it doesn't give a time so I guess if they haven't been warned off then to expect a visit on Thursday?

 

I know I should have phoned the Court,

 

I thought I was doing everything right in trying to get copies of the invoices,

providing evidence of regular weekly payments,

 

ensuring contact was made with all parties etc.,

 

sending letters Recorded.

 

Guess I failed on that part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hey no sweat

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262390-Bailiff-called-yesterday-N244-N245

 

I even ended up phoning a Bailiff Support Company this evening

and have taken all my information and will call me back tomorrow.

 

I hope they were not a fee paying advice company

if so cancel now

they are no better than cag.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I have read it through but will read again tomorrow, been a very stressful day today.

 

I did send the N245 form to the HCEO but I am guessing they are not interested and I needed to send that to the Court?

 

I even ended up phoning a Bailiff Support Company this evening

and have taken all my information and will call me back tomorrow.

 

I hope they were not a fee paying advice company

if so cancel now

they are no better than cag.

 

No it was a Freephone number and free advice. Was in panic mode and didn't know where to turn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter states:

 

 

Removal of Assets will now take place with or without your presence and where necessary an application will be made to the Court under Paragraph 15, Schedule 12,

Tribunals Courts and Enforcements Act 2007 for Authority to enter your premises with the aid of a locksmith.

 

Where applicable, any additional court costs and attendance fees will be added to the amount due under the Writ.

 

Can I just make the point very clear that the enforcement agent cannot and will not force entry into your property. In order to obtain this exceptional provision, the enforcement company would first have to make an application to court (under paragraph 15 of Schedule 12). I cannot envisage such an application being made for a debt of around £1,000.

 

Goods from outside of your home could be taken and almost always, this would refer to a motor vehicle and this leads me onto my next question which is: do you have a vehicle outside of your home and if so, how much roughly is it worth. Also, is the vehicle on finance?

 

 

PS; With regards to the recent notice was left at your home, was a breakdown of fees provided?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for getting back to me.

 

That is reassuring to know that they cannot break into my house. Yes there are two cars, one is my son's which is in his name and all paid for. The other is my car which is in my name and again all paid for.

My son's car is worth about £1500 and mine about [removed]

There was no breakdown of costs whatsoever, there was just a line that said as of today's date X is owed which included VAT.

 

I am really trying to sort this out and genuinely willing to pay the true cost of what is owed, but this should have never gone to HCEO had FedEx been allocating my payments correctly.

 

Both myself and my son need our cars to get to/from work though.

 

I have until 13th April to resolve this so any help/advice would be appreciated as this is making physically sick with worry.

 

I will be calling the Courts on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HoneyBee13

 

Thank you much appreciated. I am now starting to worry about the cars, it seems never ending.

 

I just wanted this sorted and I appreciate the weekend doesn't help but at least I know you guys will help me all you can and it really is appreciated.

 

Thanks JO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most important info you need for this weekend is that should you get a caller then regardless of anything they may say they do NOT have any automatic right of entry to your home.

 

However if there are any detached buildings on your site

- garage, workshop etc then they may force entry to those if they believe they may contain goods that will satisfy the debt.

If you have a garage that is physically attched to your home then it would be best to put your car and any other valuables in there and LOCK the door.

 

The bit about them applying to force entry is true and does happen but is more reserved for those with a detached mansion with a Bentley on the drive.

Bailiff Advice is correct in saying that for a low value case like yours they will not take that step.

 

Your way forward on this

- particularly if you have proof of payments

- is to invite the Claimant to think again about the route they have taken & ask themselves for the CCJ to be Set Aside & Writ cancelled.

 

If they refuse

- which I suspect they will because they then become liable for the fees to date from the HCEO

- then politely inform them you will apply yourself and will ask for your costs in doing so.

 

Set Aside & a Stay may seem daunting as they are not quite straightforward but can provide a guide as how to do it.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

just to update everyone since this post over 12 months ago.

 

FedEx put a HOLD on the HCE providing I agreed to pay the invoices and set up a standing order.

I think they realised that they were in the wrong when my weekly payments were not being allocated and they progressed with the HCE.

I have about £100 left to pay of the FedEx invoices :-)

 

I do have one quick question please if someone could help.

 

I have obtained a copy of my credit file today, and I have 2 x CCJs which are in relation to the unpaid invoices which the HCE were chasing me for,

however one of these has been paid off, but they are not marked as settled on my credit file.

 

This is the email I received details below

- can someone advise as to whether the CCJs have been incorrectly placed against my credit file given they have said the court proceedings are on hold?

 

Also,

I have heard nothing from them since the payment plan was set up,

they never got in touch with me to discuss the next CCJ nor have I had any correspondence from them since April 2016

- for all they know I could have stopped making these payments and they wouldn't know a thing!

 

I do not want to be paying £255 for each CCJ to have these set aside when they were incorrectly charged against me in the first place due to their incompetence and not allocating the payments correctly BUT at the same time,

I want to get these removed.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

 

Thank you for your time on the telephone just now and the opportunity to discuss the outstanding accounts and the suggested payment plan.

 

As confirmed, the payment which you are currently making to Control account in the sum of £15.00 per week is being allocated to CA Account reference xxxxxx which is the account highlighted in lilac at the top of the table I sent to you in the earlier email (Fedex account number xxxxxxx).

I can confirm that the table shows this account as having a £64.98 debt but you have since paid a further total of £20.00 towards this, reducing the current balance to £44.98 (this £20.00 payment was made in the form of a £5.00 payment and a £15.00 payment, the latter being the payment you refer to in your email below).

As discussed, we have suggested that you continue to pay your standing order to Control account on the above reference and make no alterations as this will mean that this account is going to be paid off over the next 3 weeks.

Just to confirm – this account is NOT the subject of any court proceedings.

The accounts highlighted in yellow where the debt alone totals £572.93, ARE the subject of court proceedings and it is this action which is currently on hold with the HCEO.

The Claim number relative to the action is XxxXXxxx.

We have four separate Control account reference numbers for these accounts which are: xxxxxxx, xxxxxxx, xxxxxxx, xxxxxxx.

Again, as discussed, we have agreed that you will now arrange for a standing order to be set up with Control account for £15.00 per week, commencing 26th April 2016 towards this Court action and we will apply this to each of the four reference numbers captured within this case, clearing one reference number at a time.

Additionally, we have agreed that when your account with our Collections department is cleared in the very near future, you will contact your bank and will increase your standing order in respect of the case above to £30.00 per week to clear the balance quicker.

 

When your debt and the Court costs associated with the above court action are cleared, we will contact you to discuss your payments continuing but with them being applied towards the second lilac highlighted account which is also the subject of Court action which is currently on hold (Claim number XxxXXxxx).

Please note that in addition to the debt figures which appear in the table below, you will also be responsible for the payment of the costs which I listed in my email of the 18th April 2016 but providing that everything is cleared in accordance with our arrangement, the High Court Enforcement fees of £318.00 will be waived.

I set out below, our bank details for you to set up your new standing order and would advise that it is imperative that the Control account reference number of xxxxxxx is quoted on this transaction for the payments to be allocated correctly.

Edited by johealey
paragraphs missing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to update everyone since this post over 12 months ago. FedEx put a HOLD on the HCE providing I agreed to pay the invoices and set up a standing order. I think they realised that they were in the wrong when my weekly payments were not being allocated and they progressed with the HCE. I have about £100 left to pay of the FedEx invoices :-) I do have one quick question please if someone could help.

 

I have obtained a copy of my credit file today, and I have 2 x CCJs which are in relation to the unpaid invoices which the HCE were chasing me for, however one of these has been paid off, but they are not marked as settled on my credit file. This is the email I received details below - can someone advise as to whether the CCJs have been incorrectly placed against my credit file given they have said the court proceedings are on hold?

 

Also, I have heard nothing from them since the payment plan was set up, they never got in touch with me to discuss the next CCJ nor have I had any correspondence from them since April 2016 - for all they know I could have stopped making these payments and they wouldn't know a thing! I do not want to be paying £255 for each CCJ to have these set aside when they were incorrectly charged against me in the first place due to their incompetence and not allocating the payments correctly BUT at the same time, I want to get these removed. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

 

Thank you for your time on the telephone just now and the opportunity to discuss the outstanding accounts and the suggested payment plan. As confirmed, the payment which you are currently making to Controlaccount in the sum of £15.00 per week is being allocated to CA Account reference xxxx745 which is the account highlighted in lilac at the top of the table I sent to you in the earlier email (Fedex account number xxxxxxx). I can confirm that the table shows this account as having a £64.98 debt but you have since paid a further total of £20.00 towards this, reducing the current balance to £44.98 (this £20.00 payment was made in the form of a £5.00 payment and a £15.00 payment, the latter being the payment you refer to in your email below).

 

As discussed, we have suggested that you continue to pay your standing order to Controlaccount on the above reference and make no alterations as this will mean that this account is going to be paid off over the next 3 weeks. Just to confirm – this account is NOT the subject of any court proceedings.

 

The accounts highlighted in yellow where the debt alone totals £572.93, ARE the subject of court proceedings and it is this action which is currently on hold with the HCEO. The Claim number relative to the action is xxxxxxxx We have four separate Controlaccount reference numbers for these accounts which are: xxxxxx,

xxxxxxx,

xxxxxxx,

xxxxxxx.

 

Again, as discussed, we have agreed that you will now arrange for a standing order to be set up with Controlaccount for £15.00 per week, commencing 26th April 2016 towards this Court action and we will apply this to each of the four reference numbers captured within this case, clearing one reference number at a time. Additionally, we have agreed that when your account with our Collections department is cleared in the very near future, you will contact your bank and will increase your standing order in respect of the case above to £30.00 per week to clear the balance quicker. When your debt and the Court costs associated with the above court action are cleared, we will contact you to discuss your payments continuing but with them being applied towards the second lilac highlighted account which is also the subject of Court action which is currently on hold (Claim number xxxxxxx).

 

Please note that in addition to the debt figures which appear in the table below, you will also be responsible for the payment of the costs which I listed in my email of the 18th April 2016 but providing that everything is cleared in accordance with our arrangement, the High Court Enforcement fees of £318.00 will be waived. I set out below, our bank details for you to set up your new standing order and would advise that it is imperative that the Controlaccount reference number of xxxxxx is quoted on this transaction for the payments to be allocated correctly.

 

 

Thank you for updating the forum. I have taken the liberty to post your question again to hopefully make it easier to read. I have also tried to hide personal information (your account numbers and court file reference).

Link to post
Share on other sites

so did you ever find out what they took you to court for and what all these debts are?

 

have you been importing stuff from overseas and why have they got 4 invoices against you

have you demanded a full breakdown of each in writing for each one?

 

sounds like its bogus custom fees and import tax they claim they've paid on your behalf

and I bet knowing control accounts well here

they've added £40 a letter in charges each time they've written

they cant do that they are a DCA.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for updating the forum. I have taken the liberty to post your question again to hopefully make it easier to read. I have also tried to hide personal information (your account numbers and court file reference).

 

Thank you, I did try a number of times and it was driving me insane that it wouldn't allow me to paragraph it properly so thank you for your help, much appreciated :-)

 

On the question of your credit file, it is your responsibility to have the judgment marked as satisfied. If you have a look on the Registry Trust website, you should find the relevant details.

 

PS: I will have a read back on the thread and post back later this afternoon.

 

Thank you............ I have the relevant information with regards to the two CCJs, but given they were put on hold I am surprised to find they have actually placed these against me.

Will look forward to your reply later :-)

 

so did you ever find out what they took you to court for and what all these debts are?

 

have you been importing stuff from overseas and why have they got 4 invoices against you

have you demanded a full breakdown of each in writing for each one?

 

sounds like its bogus custom fees and unport tax they claim they've paid onyour behalf

and I bet knowing control accounts well here

they've added £40 a letter in charges each time they've written

they cant do that they are a DCA.

 

I used to import stock from China and sell on eBay, but it was very time consuming and not worth my while

- as my tax return showed, so I stopped.

 

It turns out they were charging me the relevant import tax and each parcel dating back to 2013 but I hadn't received the invoices!

I found this out when I started to get the HCE on the door.

 

I had also never received the CCJ paperwork either and noticed these on my file this week and only clicked today that they were for the outstanding invoices due to matching up the email information!

 

I think they had 4 invoices against me because I had some parcels delivered to work and some delivered to home and it turns out they had set up a number of accounts in my name!

 

I have received a spreadsheet showing all the invoices which is why I know this dated back to 2013.

 

Given the account was on hold I was surprised to see the CCJs being allocated to my account,

they are definitely worth trying to get removed otherwise I am waiting until 2021, satisfied or not.

 

The content of the email may explain as to whether I should give them a nudge,

even though I have not heard from them since April 2016

and I am sure as hell think that they are not even aware I have been paying these back as I have heard nothing from them.

 

I don't want to rock the apple cart by writing to them just in case they then try to make me pay for the HCE costs of £318,

 

however, I do want the CCJs removed when they had put the account on hold and these should not be there.

 

What is the best way to approach this please as I feel that I have done everything that they have asked,

have had no contact from them in the best part of 18 months

yet they have slapped 2 x CCJs on me which were on hold.

 

Any templates would be very much appreciated as I am loathed to have the CCJs set aside at a cost over £250 each! Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant put a CCJ on hold - no such thing.

unless they meant you to sign a tomlin order which means as long as you pay - the judgement is not registered.

 

your story regarding this is a wee bit confusing as to how things work.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

already stated why above..

 

they cant put a CCJ on hold - no such thing.

unless they meant you to sign a tomlin order which means as long as you pay - the judgement is not registered.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

already stated why above..

 

 

they cant put a CCJ on hold - no such thing.

unless they meant you to sign a tomlin order which means as long as you pay - the judgement is not registered.

 

Well they can if they hold off (delay) requesting judgment....as it was a judgment in default.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

but then they wouldn't show though?

I believe from reading earlier posts the CCJ are showing on credit file?

just puzzles me...which is it?

 

 

though where control account are involved

they'll say anything to get money out of people over spoof charges to line their pockets

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats because they didn't hold it ...but you stated they cant hold it..simply posting that a CCJ can be put on hold in the case of a default judgment....simply do not submit n225

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi,

 

 

Just looking for a little bit of advice re this thread please.

 

 

To cut a long story short, both CCJs have now been paid off.

 

I have been fighting for the past 2 months with FedEx complaints department to get the two CCJs removed completely from all credit files

- these CCJs would not have been put on my credit files had the standing order weekly payments been allocated to my outstanding invoices correctly.

Therefore I see that they are at fault - no paperwork to defend was ever received either.

 

I have been chasing and each time get told

"its in hand and they are getting the CCJs removed".

 

However, today after chasing last week (again!),

I received an email to say the legal team are refusing to remove these CCJs even though they are at fault and state that I have admitted to agreeing to receiving the paperwork (I did no such thing).

 

They have said the only way that I can get these CCJs removed is to wait 6 years and to get a certificate of satisfaction to show these have been paid off.

I could apply to have them set aside however that is now a cost of £255 PER CCJ!

 

My question is,

do I have enough grounds,

given this was their error in not allocating my payments (which I can provide proof of payment),

to keep fighting this to get them removed without costing me any money?

 

Or;

 

Could I apply to have them both set aside and try and claim the costs back from FedEx?

 

These 2 CCJs are going to ruin my credit file for another 3 years and even if they are marked satisfied will they still give me a bad file?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep satisfied or not they kill credit esp mortgages.

 

if you've written proof it was their error

then you should be able to get the set aside fees out of them if you are successful.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...