Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • @dx100uk no, haven’t received any correspondence as of yet. Still waiting on a court date but seems to be taking forever. Have noticed an increase in unhappy customers on here
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor Erudio/drydens CCJ for Student loans - sent claimform to old address when they knew my correct one **WON+Combo** ongoing FOS deferment complaint


rennuz

Recommended Posts

I live in Portugal and come to the UK every couple of months, (lucky me)

I got to the Uk today and have found I have a CCJ registered against me from Erudio via Drydens as of 21st June.

Its for an old Student loan of £8700 in total from the 90's.

I was deferring it but Erudio then took it on and disagreed with deferment, this was in 2021.

They said they couldn't read my email attachment.

They then made it a formal debt and put my in arrears. 

I complained they disagreed, then ignored me. 

I then went to the Ombudsman, they take forever and not heard from them. 

In the meantime some firm, i forget the name, offered me a partial settlement in Jan of around £2500 but it was over the phone and no offer in writing was made.

I then get to UK today and saw Drydens first letter as of 11th April, then CCJ started in May 24th and CCJ issued as of 21st June.

I have 2 days to pay to get it wiped.

 

Questions are,

can I get out of the debt as per statute that I see on here, need to read more into that, sorry just writing this now with minimal time and researching.

Can I get out of CCJ or get it looked at again? 

I dont want a CCJ but as I live outside UK and dont have credit its no real issue.

Can I make a full and final settlement of say £3000 and get it wiped from my file?

Only want to make a payment if its going to get wiped.

I could pay it but it will leave a sour taste and it should not have got to this stage.

If there are places anyone recommends to research please let me know.

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you perm resident abroad and have proof.?

if you do

then get it set aside via n244, cant get a CCJ if you live abroad typically.

cant be SB'd. i think thats what you mean as you deferred till 2021?

did you defer every year before that from 2013 sale.?

the other firm would have been capquest, part of the arrows group, as is erudio and drydens.


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/drydens CCJ for Student loans - but i perm live abroad - help

cheers for the reply, you helped me 12 yrs ago with some great debt advice that saved me, I have passed on the advice since. Saved me alot of money...... I do owe you one! 

Yes I have been a permanent resident officially since 2019.

I did defer every year before 2013, thought I was doing the right thing.... perhaps should have left it.!

Anyway I have a CCJ now.... 

So could I go with the N244? I did apply for the deferement under a UK address but did reside in Portugal at the time and can confirm, I have a UK  Company and a UK property I rent out, which is where they have now issued the CCJ to....

Slightly stressed as thinking I may have to make this payment tomorrow to keep it off my permament record.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

from 2013 onwards to 2020/1 ...read my question..

did you defer every year?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so not SB'd.

when you deferred before did you use your Portugal address for them/correspondence

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I was using my Uk address in correspondence to them. I did inform them of address change to Portugal  in 2021 but then I was just dealing with them on email. And address change was only via email, no acknowledgment from them. Is that an avenue to take?

wondering if I try call tomorrow and offer a smaller amount to remove the CCJ. I really don’t want a CCJ on my file. Could need credit in next 6 yrs if I came back or something, hard to say.

i am thinking it’s so late in day and I do owe this money, that i do something to remove CCJ from record. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no!!

28 minutes ago, rennuz said:

I did inform them of address change to Portugal  in 2021 but then I was just dealing with them on email

have you that email?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes. They read the email, I get read receipts but no reply. So just an email in my sent folder.

things like this I get sent to my parents and my Dad forwards on.

The deferment was all sent to parents then the CCJ and correspondence from drydens was all sent To my old personal home.

We Airbnb it so stay at it when we are in uK but only once or twice a year but I still have it.

So it’s technically a personal address.

 

looking into removing a CCJ by consent…. Thinking that is next best option.
 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have email proof you sent them notification you were residing abroad. and a read receipt.

that potentially nulls the CCJ.

you could try contacting them directly with that proof stating you demand they cancel the CCJ by mutual consent FOC to you.

failing that you are going to have to raise an N244, on papers only that ~£100, if you want a hearing thats £275.

but these costs can be gotten out of erudio when you win.

there are court threads here about erudio and their failure to accept (for whatever reason) email deferment.

and there are FOS rulings of same against them.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will contact them asking to cancel the CCJ but do I have any hope there? Been told they take months to reply. 
 

I will then do the N244, is it best to sight the change of address and non Uk resident?

Should I also confirm details of my defence.

I do owe the money though so is this realistic?

Yes it should have been deferred. I also did put in a claim to FOS. I got. Receipt from FOS last year but then heard nothing so I assume they forgot about it. I resurrected that complaint yesterday.

a question I have though,

where will this then go?

Is the overall aim to get a deferment?

I am now in a better position so I am unlikely to get it deferred in the future.

Which begs the question why not settle?

I did engage early this year and we agreed on an amount of under £3k to settle, I asked for it in writing and that didn’t happen so it got lost.

to me a £3k settlement is a good outcome so it’s how I get there as quickly and as painlessly as possible without a CCJ.

I am seriously tempted to pay this off today (last day I can).

I am FCA registered so these things aren’t good.

What is a best case if I don’t?

I owe the money so can I get it reduced from £8700 to less?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st throw the morality card of 'you owe this money' out the window,

the gov't sold these old style SLC loans to various companies over many years at a discounted rate of ~10p=£1, in turn the fleecers went after the debtors for the full value...thats true immorality!!

you wont get a discounted settlement on a backdoor CCJ, they have judgement.

i doubt the CCJ will show on the public records for atleast another couple of weeks if not more, its not done immediately the 1 month payment window time limit expires. and cra file typically only update once a month on contents of any relevant public registers.

id be more concerned with it being friday and getting drydens off their perch before they all descend down the pub on the free money M's of people blindly pay them on debts they didn't legally even owe.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so I don’t pay, I get a CCJ.

What is then the aim?

As far as I can see I can get them to an order of consent to cancel the CCJ due to me being non resident and wrong addresses,

I did contact them yesterday so they could say I knew within the time and may disagree to this, I can’t see why they would agree to this though, what’s in it for them?

Failing a consent then the next step is the n244 form, I get that and I think I have a good case, non resident, They used an old address etc.

Now I have the CCJ thrown back out, great.

The debt is still there though and the consent is likely to come with an agreement to pay, so its not wiped at that stage.

If this was you would your aim to be to wipe off the debt?

If I can get the debt reduced by say half, I am happy as long as there is no CCJ. Is that realistic?

Spoke to a few solicitors and the potential costs may be upto £1500 for this and potentially more if hearings needed, is it worth the pain… isn’t a lump sum payment a better option?

I noticed Jules case that she lost and now has a fees associated with it as well…. This worried me.

Can I possibly now get this loan wiped off?

They didn’t deal with the deferment correctly and it should have been deferred,

now they have moved it into a different kind of debt

can this go back to a student loan style debt as per the preferment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what you mean by moved this to a diff kind of debt?

you dont need a solicitor on a consumer credit debt CCJ..do it for free here.

the court claim was issued when they already knew you were not resident in the UK.

thats an almost guaranteed set aside either way by consent order (do NOT agree to a payment plan!! ) or a reset to just received the initial claim.

your defence would be they refused deferment in xxxx , they should not have left it.

as for wiping it, that would only happen if the loans were +25yrs or are over 50..i think.. how old are you?

it doesnt matter you are earning above the threshold now...immaterial.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant moved from a student loan, ie cancelled that after deferment was not agreed to.

the CCJ is on my credit file already, I can see after looking. 

next stage is either writing to Drydens to ask them to cancel it based on wrong address, I would also like to know why they are writing to a different address than Erudio used an even older address. I think I will call them and ask them about the address details they have on file.

I am not holding out much hope with a letter asking to cancel the CCJ based on wrong address but if that’s the best thing initially then what is the recommendation on how I word such a letter.

Timeline from Dryden

11th April - Letter saying get in contact and if not then they may issue legal proceedings, that’s it nothing else.

24th May Claim form from County Court

21st June County court judgement 

1 letter from Drydens then straight to CCJ, is that right?

 

Idea for initial letter to Drydens

Simply

Dear Sir/Madam

As you know I am a Portuguese resident and reside in Portugal, I came back to the UK on 20th July (proof can be provided). I was given a letter from you dated 11th April which was sent to an address I vacated in 2015. Erudio have been corresponding to me via email address and via my parents address at xxxx. 

I have also been given letters about a claim form from the courts and judgment from the courts dated 21st June. Obviously it has been impossible for me to have the ability to defend or act upon these letters as I have been out of the country as Erudio are well aware.

I informed Erudio on 6th May 2022 of my correct address, see the enclosed copy of the email and read receipt from Erudio.

Erudio declined a deferment in 2021 after they were provided with exactly the same information as I had been providing both them and the SLC company every year when a deferment was due. That ongoing saga is now in the Hands of the Financial ombudsman who are dealing with the complaint.

I ask that you cancel this CCJ based on the above information and look forward to receiving the conformation as soon as possible.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont beg nor ask them to cancel the CCJ Judgement and you should not be nice and polite.

you DEMAND that they immediately draw up a mutually agreed consent order at no cost to you where they will be removing the backdoor and unlawful CCJ as you have written proof their client was informed in writing dated xxx of your permanent residence and citizenship in a foreign country and even received a read receipt from them about same.

you dont need to say anything else.

have you not been reading the numerous like threads here upon what to do and state.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear you,

I will go back and do a bit more research on perhaps the best way to phrase a letter.

I do have my reservations about any positive response though, what’s in it for them? Literally nothing as I see it.

A quick note though,

don’t they have to set defaults and other things before they go straight for a CCJ, they have literally only sent me one letter on this.

What’s the protocol,

the CCJ claim says the claimant has complied with the pre-action protocol.

Is that just one letter sent from the solicitors, surely got to be more to it than that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't need to do research. get angry. they have scammed you. my suggestion is all you need.

stop crawling and thinking they have some magical powers over you..they DON'T!!

i'd even be inclined to ring drydens and shout down the phone at them. thats worked before.

i would suspect everything else went to an old address...funny how they find your correct address once they have a default judgement...:pound:

ruddy fleecers.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Key - to follow

address 1 - Parents UK address, I can see this post parents will pick it up and scan it to me

Address 2 - Still own this property but don’t see the post for 6/9 mths. Address CCJ info went to and that Drydens have

So I spoke to Drydens and Erudio today,

Erudio confirmed I changed address to address 1 in 2021, which is on their file. Then it moved to Drydens and Dryden have been sending letters to my old UK address, address 2, therefore getting this CCJ. After more probing with Erudio as to why Drydens would use an old UK address to send this to Erudio said a letter was returned in Jan 2023 saying ‘ no longer at this address’ don’t understand why as my parents did not send anything back and have always opened mail to address 1. For note Erudio have on file address 1 when I call them to verify my security.

Erudio have no record of me changing address to Portugal, I do and have a receipt.

So failing the incorrect Portugal address, the UK address was still incorrect. 

Spoke to Drydens on the phone, told them they should be cancelling the CCJ by consent due to incorrect address and the fact I am a non-uk resident. They weren’t very receptive to cancelling it and pointed out they need some kind of evidence to just cancel it, fair enough. I put in a complaint about the address and asked Drydens to investigate why they have the incorrect address.

I suppose next step is to demand they cancel the Consent, in the demand I will need to point out the fact they have incorrect address and also that I provided address changes in 2021 and then in 2022, although they still used address prior to 2021.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see where they go . dont give into waffle!! 

the uk address issue is immaterial.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to get this letter out to them, they have now started a complaint about the address details which they are investigating with Erudio but not based on the Portugal address, this was as a result of the call on Monday.

I need to write them a demand, here is my plan for letter, cant actually see anything to give me an idea as what to write but will try keep it brief.

Dear

You have falsely and incorrectly had a CCJ issued against my name, I had no chance to defend it as all your correspondence went to an old address which according to Erudio you were fully aware was an old address.

My address is xxxxx I changed this address with Erudio in 2022, see the enclosed email confirming this sent on  xxxx 

I demand that you cancel this CCJ by a consent order immediately free of charge to me.

should you fail to action this within 14 days, i will without further notice proceed to court and raise an N244 set aside at full cost to yourselves inc compensation and for damage to my credit worthiness .

to be clear, you raised a court claim resulting in a backdoor CCJ using an old UK address when your client had previously acknowledgment by return of my written notification of my address and permanent residency in Portugal.

you have 14 days. 

 

Will that do?

Also, can I send all this on email? or would a letter be best

Link to post
Share on other sites

changes made.

use both.

get free proof of posting from any PO counter.

 

past like threads below to read up on

clickme^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I sent the letter and they have told me as soon as they received it that the case was put on hold whilst they investigate the complaint.

We are now past 14days (do we mean calendar days or total days?)

do I wait for them to investigate the complaint (how long is that?)

or get on with my threat and raise the N244?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

id give it a week, is this by email par chance?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes all by email.

got an email today saying that Erudio are investigating my complaint and are still looking into it and it could take another 8weeks?

Im minded to move to next stage, they gave me no time, why should I return favour?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...