-
Posts
168,927 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
766
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by dx100uk
-
@shiply - courier has vanished with my items please help
dx100uk replied to eml1980's topic in Postal and Delivery Services
quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address -
urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws if memory serves me right?
-
PRA Claimform - Old Barclaycard debt
dx100uk replied to Stripeycat's topic in Financial Legal Issues
have a look at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx -
PRA Claimform - Old Barclaycard debt
dx100uk replied to Stripeycat's topic in Financial Legal Issues
all are incomplete? we need all pages. the agreement must be for the time/address of takeout date with a tickbox/sig/or typed name if online. the T&C's must have your name and address for the time of their released 'update' the base agreement is here already in many barclaycard PRA or Lowell threads go read a few 10's... as appears and as other threads...mostly bogroll. await the DQ n180 from the court IF one ever comes keep checking MCOL history status. -
PRA Claimform - old Newday Marbles Credit Card Debt
dx100uk replied to Stripeycat's topic in Financial Legal Issues
pers i'd await the mediation and go for a consent order. get things ratified by the judge and legally binding then they cant keep pestering you to up payments dx -
yours is not the next move. until/unless lowell produce an enforceable agreement (fat chance) you ignore them. if they dont by say 3 days before the hearing date i'd put in a demand for the claim to be dismissed and an absolvitor issued. blow lowells out the water. used to be an incidental Application not sure if its the same now in the new system. dx
-
give the SAR another few days . if you get nowt by say tuesday complain to the ICO studio have ignored your legally binding SAR. dx
-
well get reading up then Programmable Search Engine (google.com) clickme^^^^ we are self help too.. you should be blocking and bouncing ALL emails/addresses and blocking their number and reporting the txtx to spam 7726. if you'd read up...you'd have known to do that. dx
-
you dont seem to have uploaded the cancellation box sheet nor anything with a tickbox/dates name typed in //ie your signup agreeing? did they not supply those? ps ive redacted things too...you left your name on both docs..is the address correct for time of takeout for each set of T&C's/Agreement? (note they are diff updated T&C periods) have a look at PRA barclaycard threads already here, you'll see that (base) agreement return already.... its identical.
-
the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx
-
@shiply - courier has vanished with my items please help
dx100uk replied to eml1980's topic in Postal and Delivery Services
well at least you have a crime ref number to use that to frighten people.. -
Advise on debt I currently hold
dx100uk replied to MANUKI12742's topic in Debt management and Debt self-help
a default cal marker will not remove the debt in 6yrs regardless to whatever you do but as ive said 3 times now the issuance and registering of a default notice does. please get reading up.... dx -
Advise on debt I currently hold
dx100uk replied to MANUKI12742's topic in Debt management and Debt self-help
1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this. -
if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
-
Advise on debt I currently hold
dx100uk replied to MANUKI12742's topic in Debt management and Debt self-help
receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves. if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA. as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.