SCDH
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
2 NeutralRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Quick question. I'm keeping positive about this but does anyone know if there are likely to be further added legal costs (other than already stated on the Claim Form) if the case goes against me and in what sort of price bracket? The Claim Form states £35 Court fee and £50 Legal representative's costs in addition to their claim. I just wondered what other costs they could add?
-
Thanks for revising the dates for AOS and defence filing and the claim form thread link. Thanks Brassnecked. Yes, it's good to keep that in mind. It's crazy it's got this far! As you probably know from Jan 2020 the BPA advised members not to pursue motorists for incorrect reg entry but it's only advise and not mandatory.
-
Thanks DX. I've already registered on the MCOL website and followed the process to and received the confirmation code and got the government gateway ID. It's just that after logging into MCOL I'm unable to proceed past 'Respond to a claim made against you' until my 'Defence pack password' is accepted. They've responded to my email and said that I can do the same by emailing them at [email protected].
-
Name of the Claimant : NATIONAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal Date of issue – 18th nov 2021 Date for AOS - 6th dec Date to submit Defence - 20th dec What is the claim for – 1.The Claim for the sum of .... being due from the Defendant in respect of a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) for a contractual breach which occurred on .... in the private car/park land at ..... 2.The PCN was issued as the driver failed to comply with the terms and conditions , as displayed . 3.Despite demands, the charge remains unpaid. 4.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.02) from .... to ... being an amount of ... The claimant also claims £60 recovery costs as set out in the Terms and Conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice.
-
Many thanks honeybee13, As requested, my answers are as follows: Please answer the following questions for ANPR. 1 Date of the infringement 23rd February 2018 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 28th February 2018 3 Date received Can't remember - approximately within a week. 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes it does. 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, a photos of my car entering and leaving and the registration number 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? National Parking Enforcement 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MJB Winelodge, Bridge Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR32 3LR For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Independent Appeals Service www.theias.org
-
Just received the Claim Form from the County Court Business Centre. Defend in writing on NB9 or pay within 14 days after date of issue. If I ignore then I'll be found guilty by default and a CCJ if I don't pay within a month. According to CAB, the court can decide to strike out a defence claim with no hearing if they don't see it as a valid defence. If it goes ahead the claimant can add further costs. Looks like it's decision time!
-
Thanks gents, I've obviously made mistakes with the statement of payment confirming me as the driver but it also helps to confirm payment was made, bit of a double edged sword but lesson learnt. Point taken about not discussing points of law and yes, I can't see the difference between getting a quid from the chippy or anywhere else. Also, good to know they can't enforce trespass or reverse trespass. As advised by all of you, I'll let them make the next move.
-
Thanks DX, While your communications are direct, I do appreciate your knowledge and experience in these matters and genuinely value your input. As far as I see it, the facts are the facts and I'm certainly not going to commit perjury in court by saying anything other than what the statement says. I know you weren't implying that, I'm just saying that the statement tells the truth and I can't deviate from it. However, I do take your point about not playing my cards early. While they might have a technical point over a breach by leaving the carpark to get the money for the machine, I would counter that with the point that it was very dark and the machine had no lighting. Also, the street lights were facing away from all signage resulting in poor lighting to read. As a result, it's hard to be responsible for an accidental breach if you aren't aware of the terms when first entering the carpark. However, I respect your advice if you think otherwise. Can you confirm that I need to receive another Letter of Claim before having to respond? Many thanks.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.