Jump to content

ChrisS1968

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About ChrisS1968

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Happy new year all!! My SIL received an EX370 today. I know he needs to sign it and return but what to do with regard to accepting their offer of mediation? By accepting it it becomes pretty much an admission really........ For the record, since filing his defense on Dec 21st he has had no further communication from the claimant and they have yet to respond on MCOL. My gut instinct would be to sign it and decline the offer and return but what do I know? If he had made a part admission then its a no brainer but as he's defending the full amount then I would guess he shou
  2. HI Andy, Thank you so much, it really is appreciated. Chris
  3. Hi Andy, Now you put it like that I guess your right, it wasn't a fair while ago. My apologies......
  4. Just spoke to SIL, He left well before this came about and left because he had another job. This action (or the threat of it) had absolutely no bearing on him leaving, he was leaving anyway. As for him being aware of the audit, he had left before it took place and only found out about it when he bumped into someone that he worked with whilst there who told him about it. He didn't get contacted about if either verbally or in writing whilst he was an employee, only after leaving and around 10 months after leaving. I had an idea this was the case but phoned him to confirm.
  5. Hi Andy, thought never entered my head. I was literally just asking. Fully understand
  6. Just had a thought, can I use the fact that my SIL never got a proper letter before action? I'm guessing so as they failed in the pre action protocol dept?
  7. Morning all, Can we cast an eye over this re-hashed defense please? 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 2 is noted. The claimant has made a broad accusation towards the defendant and cannot seem to decide what exactly they claim the defendant has done. The claimant should be expected to clarify the follow
  8. Cheers DX, As stated, its just a draft and I always knew she wouldn't fly first time. I'll take your comments on board and have another stab. Don't worry, I will leave out number 2!
  9. Afternoon all, Ive had a stab at a defense for my SIL. Its made up of sections from other threads but not being able to find any similar cases of CAG ive had to kind of wing it. Please have a look and let me have your thoughts if you can. Tell me whats wrong or needs leaving out or editing. 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2.
  10. Evening all, Right, just spoke to my SIL at length..................... In response to Andy's question regarding T's & C's, that answer remains the same. The staff MORE cards and general public's cards both had the same T's & C's. As for when he started the unofficial swiping practice, his best guesstimate is around September 2015. Another development during our conversation, I asked him if he ever asked customers for their permission to swipe his card to claim their unclaimed points. He said he never actually asked but some regulars woul
  11. 100% agree Andy, will try again. TBH, I did expect a little more info from him.
  12. Hi all, So would you say that my SIL's Goose is cooked? (Pardon the seasonal pun) Chris
  13. Morning all, sorry for the delayed response but my SIL works odd shift patterns so didn't manage to speak to him till last night. In response to Andy's questions................. He cant remember when this all began. The T's & C's for Staff cards are apparently the same as for the public cards, and no, he never received statements for the card. He did mention though that along side the illicit swipes he used his card a lot for personal purchases on nights out so a lot of the amount they are trying to reclaim could well be legitimately earned.
×
×
  • Create New...