Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NCP PCN - Asda, Cardiff Bay - DCBL DCA sending out letter with enforcement fees on them!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys hoping you can help me in some way. Ive returned home today from a week away and had 2 letters from dcbl

 

one is a notice of debt assignment

saying I have an overdue amount for £180.00 due to new generation parking management

and has now been assigned to dcbl certificated bailiffs & high court enforcement to recover.

 

the second is a notice of enforcement saying I now owe £340.00

and if I dont pay or agree a payment arrangement by the 7th November 2015

they will visit and charge me an additional £265.00.

 

I had completely forgotten about this ticket, at the time I had it I was advised by family and friends to just ignore it.

 

What do I do now, any advice?

 

ticket was dated 29/03/2014 according to enforcement details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You will need to see if they have managed to gain a CCJ against you

as the above indicates they are trying to enforce a debt as a bailiff.

 

 

If there is no CCJ then they are lying to make a great deal of money

and a complaint to various regulatory bodies are in order.

 

You will need to go to either your credit report or trustonline and pay a small fee

to look yourself up and get the details.

 

The next question is what exactly have you ignored and who from?

 

 

An assignment of debt when it doesnt exist is no problem but what other paperwork have you had??

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

What paperwork did you receive after 29/03/14?

Was this a windscreen ticket?

If not, was this an ANPR ticket

 

Has there been a court case regarding this matter?

 

If yes, did you get the court claim?

 

Can you post up the paperwork received so far minus personal details, account numbers barcodes?

 

When you post, click 'go advanced' and then you will see the paperclip. You can upload from there. Please ensure they are in pdf format

  • Confused 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I parked in Asda, Cardiff Bay in a disabled space on a match day.

I literally ran in to put my lottery on.

 

I received a letter in the post from NGP which had a photo of the front of my car taken by a camera

to show no badge displayed saying I had to pay £100.

 

I had a few letters from them further to that and a letter from a solicitor telling me to pay

but have received no letters from court.

 

Can the bailiffs come if it hasnt been to court?

 

I live with my parents so im a bit worried.

 

No nothing left on my car, a letter in the post.

 

I cant upload anything at the moment and I didnt keep any of the letters from them, I was advised to just bin and forget about it.

Ive heard nothing from them for months and now this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, I suggest you check your credit file and trust online to ensure they haven't slipped a CCJ in by the back door.

http://www.trustonline.org.uk/

 

If there is nothing then it is all bluff and bluster however, if they have got one, you would need to set the judgement aside.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even the figures dcbl are quoting are wrong.

 

The 'debt' cannot go from 180 to 340 as if they are acting as bailiffs, there are fixed fees, not the amounts they are claiming.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that the bailiff co are acting as debt collectors and are adding fees they are not entitled to in that capacity.

 

 

Go to the bailiff section of the debt forum and drop a line to bailiffadvice

and see what he says about the matter.

 

 

it could get them off your backs in no time at all never to reappear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Ive just went on trust online and I have no CCJ's recorded against me

 

England and Wales Orders & Judgments

NOTHING REGISTERED

England and Wales High Court Judgments

NOTHING REGISTERED

England and Wales Fine Defaults

NOTHING REGISTERED

England and Wales Tribunal Awards

NOTHING REGISTERED

Scotland Ordinary Causes Summary and Small Claim Decrees

NOTHING REGISTERED

Republic of Ireland Registered Court Judgments

NOTHING REGISTERED

Northern Ireland Judgments

NOTHING REGISTERED

Northern Ireland High Court Judgments

NOTHING REGISTERED

Jersey Judgments

 

the only paper work ive had is reminders about the parking fine from NGP and a letter from solicitor - think is was Roxburge or something like that and then nothing at all til these letters from the bailiffs.

 

i was advised to post here from the parking enforcement thread.

 

I received a parking notice from NGP in March last year and had a few letters from them following this up and one letter from a solicitor and then nothing for months until now

 

Ive just come home from a week away to two letters from dcbl - one is a notice of debt assignment and the other is a notice of enforcement.

 

Ive checked trust online on the advice of the forum and I have no ccjs.

 

The original debt was £100, it is now £340.00 and it says if I dont contact them by 7th November 2015 I can be charged a further £265.00.

 

Is this legal? Any advice on what I should do please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a Local Authority or Private parking issue ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is being discussed on this thread.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?454878-Notice-of-enforcement-from-dcbl-regarding-ngp-parking-ticket

 

We don't want to merge it as yet as we are not 100% sure that the bailiffs here are legit.

 

Edit. Private Parking Ticket. New Generation Parking.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

bet they are not legal

 

and I suspect the letter does not say they are bailiffs at all

it will be there DCA wing.?

 

pretty safe to continue to ignore if so

 

can you up load the letters

so we can have a laugh please

 

follow the upload

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just 2 things more to check

 

are you the registered keeper

or are they are the same address under a diff name

as the CCJ might be against them.

 

and DCBL do have a DCA wing too.

 

not just the HCEO's you see on TV.

 

dx

 

back later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps

they should not be sending those out

as they are acting as debt collectors here and not bailiffs

wrong letterhead to use

 

 

Phillips used to do this on a regular basis and got well carpeted for it.

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely magic.

 

You have enough ammo here to make a complaint direct to the MOJ.

 

They can only be acting as a Debt Collectors as there is no CCJ in place against you.

 

Next and only if there was a CCJ and only if it were over £600 and only if it had been transferred up to the High Court for enforcement could they act.

 

As the sum would be considerably less than £600 then if a CCJ had been gained it would have to be enforced by the County Court Bailiff anyway.

 

They are so out of it that they do indeed need to have a complaint made against them at the highest level

& as the Authorised HCEO has also to take responsibility then a complaint needs to made against her as well.

  • Confused 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

assigment notice

 

Wow thank you guys and gals for your help. you've put my mind at rest at least. I had visions of them terrifying my mother! :oops:(ive seen them on channel 5)

 

so I now need to put in a complaint, any help with wording it or should i just send them copies of what ive received?

 

thanks again for your replies your all amazing:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and mascaraed as bailiffs....reminds me of Phillips bailiffs years ago....

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am shocked at these documents. I notice as well that if payment is not made by the designated time that a 'third stage fee' of £240 will be added.

 

As a matter of urgency, these notices need to be brought to the attention of the Ministry of Justice and the British Parking Association. Before doing so, I would suggest that you contact DCBL by email tomorrow with a list of enquiries. I can put a draft letter together for you by the morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a post above BA

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...