Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

35 hour a week Jobsearh


Flickyhecky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Next monday i am expected to plan out my 35 hour a week Jobsearch for the JC.

 

How are they going to monitor this, and is it actually possible to search for work for 7 hours solidly every day of the week?

 

Also setting up a UJ account.

 

It usually takes me 2 hours a day to do a Jobseach, so it's gonna be a struggle to make it last 7 hours a day!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get google chrome and use the app to automate it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This goverment is rubbish, how an earth people can do 35 hours a week doing Jobsearch? not a lot of Jobs around and some jobs need driving licence (which people can't apply if their can't drive) and some also state need experience.

 

This goverment needs sorting out. :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reality is that the policy is ideological and punitive and not borne out of any common sense idea. It IS based on a feeling of 'I have to work all day for my money, why do they (the unemployed) get money for nothing?' Solution: Punitive measures including silly numbers of jobseeking hours, workfare, sanctions, useless courses and making life as difficult and stressful as possible for jobseekers.

Edited by estellyn
edited to remove rant

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are doing this to me now and the guy last fri told me that nxt year I will be getting a NEW booklet which u will have to go to GREAT lengths to fill!!!!

 

They are slowly making me ill with all this... I rather have nothing....

RLP are a con PLEASE DON'T PAY THEM TO DO MORE! IGNORE ALL LETTERS AND CALLS! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are sneaking in the CC

They have been terrible to me with the PWP nonsense

 

Tell them you have no internet and no pc - its impossible to spend 35 hours on a PC - even in my old office based job we had to take breaks and they were hot on health and safety issues and everyone had to have work station assessments etc even home workers - there were huge levels of sickness related to working long hours on office PCs - RSI was most common along with lighting issues causing headaches etc. Does that not apply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them you have no internet and no pc - its impossible to spend 35 hours on a PC - even in my old office based job we had to take breaks and they were hot on health and safety issues and everyone had to have work station assessments etc even home workers - there were huge levels of sickness related to working long hours on office PCs - RSI was most common along with lighting issues causing headaches etc. Does that not apply?

 

I just like to say thanks for that tip stigofthedump, if there tell me to do 35 hours of Jobsearch I will just have to say I don't have a pc and internet.

 

Don't get me wrong, I apply for jobs everyday but 35 hours a week. its bloody mad when not a lot of Jobs about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:wink:

I just like to say thanks for that tip stigofthedump, if there tell me to do 35 hours of Jobsearch I will just have to say I don't have a pc and internet.

 

Don't get me wrong, I apply for jobs everyday but 35 hours a week. its bloody mad when not a lot of Jobs about.

 

Totally agree and once your tied up with that system they can tell exactly what your doing or not doing - a friend I know is on it all the time and she struggles when her leccy runs out and kids to look after -there are very real Health and Safety issues - don't know if they can force you to go to these work scheme things and make you sit there for 35hrs if you don't have internet access. Has anyone explored H&S issues????????

 

Hope you get some good luck mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone has explored the H&S issues.

 

If you don't have a PC, they'd probably tell you to go to the job centre or library.

 

I believe in some areas they have places with computers that they send you to, or as said, tell you to go to the library or other places where there is internet.

I am not sure saying you have no connection will get you out of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in some areas they have places with computers that they send you to, or as said, tell you to go to the library or other places where there is internet.

I am not sure saying you have no connection will get you out of it.

Libraries will not be happy with people hogging PCs for 35 hours - that would prevent access to others - I wonder if the JCs know who has internet !! Bet there are some quick trick questions to catch u out - I know they look at facebook and other social media sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in some areas they have places with computers that they send you to, or as said, tell you to go to the library or other places where there is internet.

I am not sure saying you have no connection will get you out of it.

 

Just imagine the resources they would need if thousands of people in every JCP office claimed that they had no internet. It would cost the tax payer millions to provide enough computers for all of us to spend 35 hours a week seeking non existant jobs.

Times that by the jobless years we could spend hogging them DWP computers and its plain for us all to see that the system will break down. They wont cope.

Yes it might be a pain in the rear end for us at the beggining but if we all decide to go down the internet less route the reward of seeing IDS jumping off Westminster bridge when the system crashes and burns will be well worth it.

 

I urge EVERYONE on here to, at the nearest oppurtunity, to inform JCP, DWP or WP that you dont have or no longer have internet. Tell everyone you know to do the same, pass the word around.

Tell JCP, DWP and WP that you dont know how to use a computer, if they dont know this, so if we all get sent on computer courses this will cost the taxpayer millions. I for one will act dumb and fail computer courses just to help clog the system up.

 

If it costs the government billions more to maintain the regime then questions will be asked and the regime will face cuts meaning the end of UJM and other stupid proggrams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If people are sanctioned for not complying they won't be able to afford the internet.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If people are sanctioned for not complying they won't be able to afford the internet.

 

Yes, quite. Sanctions should be reserved for the most egregious cases of noncompliance, not used as a matter of routine.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, quite. Sanctions should be reserved for the most egregious cases of noncompliance, not used as a matter of routine.

 

Yes to "should be"

But I have twice in the past few months been effectively threatened with sanctions because they change how they want my job search recorded

Second time she was a petty vindictive bully who made a failed attempt to bully and openly threaten me with sanctions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next monday i am expected to plan out my 35 hour a week Jobsearch for the JC.

 

How are they going to monitor this, and is it actually possible to search for work for 7 hours solidly every day of the week?

 

Also setting up a UJ account.

 

It usually takes me 2 hours a day to do a Jobseach, so it's gonna be a struggle to make it last 7 hours a day!

 

2 hours?

 

In 2 hours I could easily produce enough evidence that on the face of it would look like I have been searching 24/7!

 

I would email a copy of my CV and a covering letter to every company, business etc using the following link.

http://www.kellysearch.co.uk/

 

Job applications would amount to the thousands a week. And when you have managed to get through the whole of the categories and names from A to Z first time round, just use your email address links to resend them every few months.

 

Then give the JC a print out of the CV and covering letter and all of the businesses that you have emailed - that should keep you busy for a couple of hours a week.

 

I would love to see the advisor's face every time that you sign on when you present a list containing upwards of 5000 applications!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]48553[/ATTACH]

 

 

Hi,

The Jobseekers Allowance Regulations 2013 came into force on 29th April 2013 and it states the new 35 hours per week job search requirement. However, it allows for certain deductions from the 35 hrs: max 50% of your agreed work search requirement can be voluntary work. ie 17,5 hrs.

 

The mistery is: who does this 35 hrs per week job search requirement relate to because most claimants do not have to do. I've been claiming since August 2013 so you would think the 2013 regulations relate to me. I am on the Work Programme, finishing soon.

 

Click on the .jpg links above to see the law about this 35 hrs job search and the allowed hours of voluntary work / work preparation.

 

When did the original poster sign on / start date of claim? Anyone knows which JSA claimants have to do the 35 hours documented job search per week? I have to be available for work for 40 hrs per week but no required hours of weekly job search in my agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...