Jump to content

Reapstar

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Reapstar

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Hi guys, The result is in for the win!! Their guy was a no show which was expected, the Judge was a very nice Man and struck out the case due to my mum never receiving the Claimants Witness statement. He was talking about something to do with CPR 27.9, although I'm not too sure but all in all, only lasted around 5 minutes. Thank you all kindly for your assistance with this matter as I would have been stuck without you!! I will be making a donation shortly I did however forget to ask the Judge for expenses, is there a way to secure these after the case?? Cheers guys!!
  2. Hey Shamrock, Thanks for the input When you say this : - Do they rely on POFA in pursuing you for the debt? If not, they have no claim against you, but will probably try to make out that you were the driver. One problem - you weren't! I will be speaking on her behalf because she isn't really able or confident enough to do this on her own... The judge will ask me if I was the driver... what do I say if this happens??
  3. Yeah, I thought as much What do you mean by this : what you want sight of is the land owners signing up THIS YEAR to the ongoing scheme operated by UKPCM started in xxxx ??
  4. A wet ink signature evidences the meeting of minds, an elementary and fundamental aspect of forming a lawfully binding Agreement. There has to be an offer, consideration, acceptance/declination and/or a counter offer involved and then mutual agreement and signage before it becomes binding. This is just obvious surely?? It's not freeman on the land stuff, its Law. There is a big difference between Lawful and Legal, this cannot be disputed otherwise there would just be the one word "lawful" but there isn't, there's two. Legal only pertains to the fictional world of commerce, which upon investigation becomes rather evidential. Especially when you start looking up what words mean in Legalese. But anyway that isn't the topic of conversation here :-p I will take your optimism as comforting, let's just hope this Judge is a good Human being!! Thank you all kindly for all of your help guys, you are a good bunch of people.
  5. Hey guys, I got this response from the Court with relation to me requesting that the WS be struck from the files. Good morningMr. xxxx, With reference to the above matter and your email below, I can confirm that the District Judge has noted the contents of the same and directed that the hearing is to remain listed and will proceed tomorrow. Kind regards, Ms A. Toogood (really???) haha Listing Section Romford County Court This was in response to : Dear Sir/Madam, With reference to the above Claim number. I write to humbly request that the Claim be struck out due to the following fair reasons: I wrote to the Claimant on 16/06/2018 via CPR 31.14 requesting information. As of the 11th of December 2018 I am yet to receive a response. I have also contacted the court asking if the claimant had delivered their Witness Statement, which I was informed they have, but I have not received a copy of it either. I kindly request that their Witness Statement be struck from the files and that the claim be dismissed without a hearing to save Court time. Thank you kindly for your assistance with this matter. Yours Faithfully, I just have the feeling I will lose tomorrow and be proved to yet again that there is no Justice system. The Judge is aware that the claimant has failed to follow the courts instructions yet he still believes that the case is worth hearing?? I am aware that all cases are based upon commerce/contract rules and that if there is no contract there can be no case. If things don't go my way and I am pushed into a corner, I will have to request the claimant produce a lawfully binding contract that evidences my consent to agree to the terms and conditions, but this cannot ever be provided because I have signed no such document. I'm sure in order for a lawfully binding contract to exist, there must be a wet ink signature below the area where the terms and conditions are available to be read and considered. There must also be equal consideration and I am yet to find none. How do you think that will go down? If the judge asks me if I was the driver I am going to have to respond with "Am I obliged to answer that question" if he says yes, I will be obliged to ask another question as such "under what law and what authority". He will then utter some nonsense and I will be forced to ask if the law is a law or statutory legislation, because failure to differentiate between the two is gross negligence and equivalent to fraud. I just feel that if I go down that route the Judge will want to eat me for dinner... All of this is giving me high blood pressure and making me ill
  6. With regard to this claim which I have in the ws : 4. UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT do not have the necessary planning permissions for their signage and equipment under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007 and as such are committing a criminal offence. UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT rely on the illegal signage to offer a unilateral contract and as it is not possible to enter into a criminal compact, any claim of a contract between them and the driver is denied. The word driver at the end seems odd to me in my case, especially as my mum is claiming she wasn't the driver, will this matter? This will be emailed to them shortly upon approval - In the County Court at Romford Claim Number: xxxx BETWEEN: UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT LIMITED Claimant And xxxxx Defendant Witness Statement of xxxxx 1. I am the keeper of the vehicle but was not the driver at the time. 2. As UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT do not rely on the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to create a keeper liability the defendant puts it to strict proof as to who was the driver at the time as there is no contractual liability created between the plaintiff and the defendant as keeper of the vehicle. 3. UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT have also failed to show any authority from the landlord that assigns them the right to enter into contracts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name. Requests for proof of authority was made by way of a CPR 31.14 request that went unanswered. The defendant believes that UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT have no locus standi in this matter. 4. UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT do not have the necessary planning permissions for their signage and equipment under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007 and as such are committing a criminal offence. UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT rely on the illegal signage to offer a unilateral contract and as it is not possible to enter into a criminal compact, any claim of a contract between them and the driver is denied. 5. There are no signs warning you as you enter the site from Waterloo road into Union Road which is evidenced by the pictures provided. 6. The signs inside the site are too small to be read from the driver’s seat of a vehicle and their position makes them impossible to read and consider without stopping to do so. This makes them unenforceable and unfair, contrary to the Consumer Contracts Regulations of 2014. STATEMENT OF TRUTH I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
  7. Hi guys, I spoke to the court again today, I asked if they could strike out the WS from Gladdys, but apparently I still have to attend court on Friday?? I emailed them and called, didn't have time to send a letter but court case is this Friday anyway, how am I supposed to get my WS statement done without receiving theirs?? All seems like a shambles really
  8. Just a quick heads up, I spoke to the court again today, apparently they have sent in their WS but I still have received nothing. the lady said to call Gladstones and ask where my copy is and/or have it struck out?? What should I do?? Cheers guys,
  9. Not yet, I will call them Monday morning and see what they say. If you click on this link it will show you the sign, the one I genuinely didn't notice when I drove in. https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5721639,0.1784986,3a,63.3y,270.74h,93.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgTW2VFl3cLHyMBY1KA-0NA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
  10. Yeah, I think that's a good idea DX, thanks for everyone's help and patience, I'm probably not the easiest to work with
  11. Unfortunately I don't have a copy of it, the original ticket was from April 2017, I did ask them to send me a copy in the CPR request but they obviously haven't responded..
  12. It also says, AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £160 for parking charges/damages and indemnity costs if applicable, together with interest at £`3.69 pursuant to s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% pa, continuing to Judgement at 0.04p per day. Maybe that's why they waited a whole year to issue the claim!!
×
×
  • Create New...