Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Cant Beleive That Welscum Muppet Was Able To Leave That Message On Page 4,but Stuff Them Im In A Dispute And 250 A Month Better Off So They Aint Getting Any Commision Now.

Im In Control Now Welscum Not You!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looked and WFS plus another Welfan-Charlie1 seem to have been very quiet recently-wonder why?!!!! Wish i could know how they feel a year later. I also laughed at WFS comment about how great it was that a director was in charge of compliance-i maybe wrong but isn't he one of the ones under investigation!!!!:)

 

Oh and his confidence because of recruitment drive!!!

Edited by sassie72
Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm wonder where that deluded little idiot is now, what a difference a year makes!!

 

The thing that me laugh the most was the spelling of insurances, he spells it insurences!! you would think that working with insurance on a daily basis he would no how to spell the bleeding word:lol:

 

As for his comments about unemployed people, I wonder if he is "one of us ****" now!!

 

If he was that happy why bother posting at all?? nice of him to admit that welcome staff are encouraged to sell PPI knowing its wrong for 99% of people. I was told by a car showroom person that I had to take out the insurances & they didnt do a statement of means check on me!

 

still lets get back to those FOS letters now must get my claim in soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh they're very careful not to missell...since June they've got all new employees on a 6 weeks compliance camp...we're FSA water-tight right now.

 

Some VERY intelligent people run this gaff, and they stick to the very letter of the law. One of the directors is responsible for compliance, and they monitor us like hawks for the slightest chance that we missell.

 

It's a very clever script.

 

I sleep very well at night on that basis. Remember, we only quote. The punters accept those quotes by their own free wills often signing credit agreements with clearly stated 80% aprs, and PPI's worth half of the loan amount itself. Bonkers? I'd say so....but there's the freewheeling "gimme now" society for you, coupled with the objection handling skills of salespeople. Tis merely a sad reflection of our sick credit obsessed society. Still we all have mouths to feed eh?

 

 

pahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha:lol:

 

wonder if hes flipping burgers yet:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone got working welcome numbers for open branches, as going to add them on my website of numbers. please pm if have, thanks!

Direct Auto Finance & DLC dispute ongoing.

Offer with confidentually agreement from DLC / DAF DECLINED :D

Please PM me if you have any cheap rate or 0800 number for DCA's to add to my list and also to my website

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just wondering how I can scan and post a copy of my contract, also who can have a look at it. I have to go the office tomrw to pay as prob with direct debit, I told them I was having trouble paying and he said he can rewrite the amount & cut the interest, does this sound right or is there another option ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, WHATEVER YOU DO, DONT SIGN ANOTHER AGREEMENT. They wont be looking after your interests, just their own.

 

If you have a copy of your current contract and can get hold of a scanner then scan it in and use a photobucket (google it) to post on here. Failing that you may be able to take a photo with a digital camera in macro mode.

 

Theres plenty of people who will help you every step of the way. It may be better to start your own thread though (go here Welcome Finance - The Consumer Forums and scroll to the "new thread" button at the bottom)

 

Finally, you can pay online if you dont want to see anybody face to face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraggle

 

DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING......they are probably saying this because there may be a problem with the existing agreement...do not let them preasure you into signing anything...make your payment ...get receipt and leave!!! if they give you anything do not sign take it home and read it!!!!!

 

b-o-2

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

pahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha:lol:

 

wonder if hes flipping burgers yet:cool:

 

 

Zarrah - I find your comment insulting!!!

:mad:

 

To imply that a welcome employee has the intelligence and skills to go from working at welcome to flipping burgers is an insult to all those good people out there who make sure we dont go hungry when we are in a rush/forgot our lunch/travelling etc I think you owe them an apology :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zarrah - I find your comment insulting!!!

:mad:

 

To imply that a welcome employee has the intelligence and skills to go from working at welcome to flipping burgers is an insult to all those good people out there who make sure we dont go hungry when we are in a rush/forgot our lunch/travelling etc I think you owe them an apology :razz:

to understand what that post meant you need to look at page 4 post made by wfssale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi im new to this site and im just wondering if anyone agrees we have a case, so here goes. my husband took out a secured loan of £10.000 to be repayed over a 15 year period from welcome finance in november 2008 we beleive he was mis-sold ppi due to the fact that he was not told the insurance was optional and was led to beleive that his application for credit would be rejected if he didnt take out the insurance, the policy exclusions were not explained to him either before or at any time he took out the insurance and was therefore not able to make an informed dicision as wether this insurance was appropriate for him. it was not explained to him that the policy premium would be paid upfront as a single premium and would be added to his dept and attract intrest. his insurance agreement expires after 60 months but the loan agreement is for 180 months which means he will be paying intrest on a policy which is no longer in force. this was not made clear to him at the time the policy was sold to him. the insurance was unsuitable for him as he was and still is selfemployed at the time he was sold the policy and was not made aware of the specific exclusions to selfemployment cover. the start amount of the loan was £13210.87 my husband pays £284.17 a month they add between £285 and £332 in capitalisation each month there fore after 12 month he now owes £13902.34 its going up not down, and i would like to know how they justify £10 for a phone call and charge £10 to send a full statement, they are rip off murchants that frive off vunrable people.

i payed £10 to have a copy of the original agreement and when it arrived the ink was smeared all over so that it was unreadable anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to understand what that post meant you need to look at page 4 post made by wfssale.

 

hi gpm0708 - I was joking with Zarrah, hence the stick out tongue at the end of my speech :p

 

She implied you can go from working in welcome to flipping burgers, I said its an insult to burger flippers:) welcome employees dont have the brains or the skill to flip burgers :D I thought it was quite amusing what I wrote but now I have had to explain it its not funny :-( (I try my hardest but it seems I am no lee evans)

 

The guy on pg4 just summerises the whole essence of a welcome employee doesnt he? Rude, arrogant , obnoxious , belittling idiots.

 

What makes things funny is that he stuck up for welcome back then and when welcome got into trouble he was probably one of the first out the door and he has probably found himself in the exact same position as all of us. It wouldnt surprise me if he has reregistered on CAG under a different name and is getting help with his own debts

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi gpm0708 - I was joking with Zarrah, hence the stick out tongue at the end of my speech :p

 

She implied you can go from working in welcome to flipping burgers, I said its an insult to burger flippers:) welcome employees dont have the brains or the skill to flip burgers :D I thought it was quite amusing what I wrote but now I have had to explain it its not funny :-( (I try my hardest but it seems I am no lee evans)

 

The guy on pg4 just summerises the whole essence of a welcome employee doesnt he? Rude, arrogant , obnoxious , belittling idiots.

 

What makes things funny is that he stuck up for welcome back then and when welcome got into trouble he was probably one of the first out the door and he has probably found himself in the exact same position as all of us. It wouldnt surprise me if he has reregistered on CAG under a different name and is getting help with his own debts

ooopppps soz, lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

info taken from OC&C Credit Management and Debt Collection Index news

 

The Lewis Group, another debt buyer, came third in the index from thirteenth last year – praised for its range of techniques and size as well as top line growth. Parent company Cattles may have struggled but this means it is less likely to be dependent on the parent, said OC&C.

Direct Auto Finance & DLC dispute ongoing.

Offer with confidentually agreement from DLC / DAF DECLINED :D

Please PM me if you have any cheap rate or 0800 number for DCA's to add to my list and also to my website

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

can anyone give me some advice on what to do,i put my acc into dispute on the 16-10-09 and cancelled the d/debit that was supposed to go out on the 19-10-09 and my local branch phoned and i told them the account was in dispute and hung up.Then i had a letter from compliance the other day saying they cannot fulfill my cca request and cannot provide me with a copy of my agreement so i am leaving the acc in dispute but i received a letter from welcome today saying notice of default sums,i am being charged 25 pounds for the cancelled d/debit but i thought while an acc is in dispute they cannot charge me.

could someone please assist me

regards

Edited by edwi69
Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone got working welcome numbers for open branches, as going to add them on my website of numbers. please pm if have, thanks!

 

a branch in liverpool still very active 0151 254 1847 except comes up as an 0845 NUMBER think they are centralising stuff more & more!:-|

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the number, will add to my list.

yes, we got a snotty call from cambridge today who said that compliance told them my complaint wasn't a complaint and not to treat it as a complaint, even though FOS say it is a complaint! Got all this in print from a telephone log too, not the first time gone through this!

Confused me even typing that so god knows how they work it out.

Direct Auto Finance & DLC dispute ongoing.

Offer with confidentually agreement from DLC / DAF DECLINED :D

Please PM me if you have any cheap rate or 0800 number for DCA's to add to my list and also to my website

Link to post
Share on other sites

i payed £10 to have a copy of the original agreement and when it arrived the ink was smeared all over so that it was unreadable anyway.

ive been on the phone today to direct group insurance to ask what insurances where paid upfront, or how much money is being paidin monthly instalments, we were told

home care £145 paid upfront

lifecare £215 paid upfront

personal protection insurance £2615.87 NOT paid upfront

we were told they recieve £44 permonth for the ppi from welcome.

according to welcomes statements they paid ALL the policys upfront and added it to our loan amount, so they are making intrest on something that they have LIED about cause its not been paid upfront at all.

so in theory if we were to go and pay welcome off tommorrow we would end up paying an extra £2615.87 {plus intrest} that we didnt really borrow.

can anyone advise us were we stand on this pppllleeaasssee

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...