Jump to content

postggj

Registered.
  • Content Count

    22,275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

postggj last won the day on August 30 2012

postggj had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,713 Excellent

About postggj

  • Rank
    Royalties Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Well they cant take the vehicle as you have paid a third without a return of goods order How long is the agreement over
  2. 500,000 available jobs, most zero / minimum wage contracts 2.6 million unemployed lottery ticket ready
  3. ukdarrenfan i have a nice letter to dig out to explain the allocation of deposit against the insurance products, how it prejudices the 50% termination point, interest rate and total amount payable is misstated with the relevant sections of the CCA 1974 I will dig it out over the weekend, it will give me a chance to transfer it onto my mobile hard drive This allocation against the insurance crap scares the hell out of them, Godebt purchased a load of turkeys over this This time we hit them with statutory obligation, lets see them rebuff that
  4. QUOTE 1) I do not need a court order for vehicle recovery if all legalities (as in my original post) have been complied with. That is where your argument falls down You need a court order to remove a vehicle off private land, and you need the agreement of the account holder if no return of goods order has been given by the court, any other procedure is irrelevant
  5. Send a subject access request Have a nose in the library
  6. Please post your up when you have time Many thanks
  7. FISHMAN123 kook up https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDEQFjAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWilson_v_First_County_Trust_Ltd_(No_2)&ei=qt_VUZWYDMiV0QX24oD4Cw&usg=AFQjCNEZqxIF656RezDsJ7OPH3bgZ6ZleQ&sig2=B4-Jn8DHqaiQ8FotT2jo_Q&bvm=bv.48705608,d.d2k then follow up with http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.consumeractiongroup.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3F255093-Waksman-Ruling&ei=MODVUYaANsaI0AXpxoC4BQ&usg=AFQjCNFk-ZzmoR5GfNmFBzGPqPIIKeMYFg&sig2=4qbB2OeVBSAfqZ3JHQ2TYw&bvm=bv.48705608,d.d2k&cad=rja
  8. Desperate daniel If i am barking up the wrong tree, and you have a better alternative, then please shout
  9. Dear Sir/Madam This is a formal request under the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR) 2008. I require your organisation to provide written confirmation that states clearly whether you currently hold an original signed Consumer Credit Agreement, or whether you do not hold an original signed Consumer Credit Agreement pertaining to myself. For the avoidance of doubt, an original signed Consumer Credit Agreement is just that; not an application for credit and not a reconstructed or microfiched document from other sources but indeed the original signed document purporting to be signed by myself. Please note that until such times as a legally enforceable, original Consumer Credit Agreement can be produced and a copy sent to me by return, then this letter is not an acknowledgement of debt and this account will remain in an unenforceable state protected in line with s.127 CCA 1974. Yours faithfully, Before anyone jumps in, i have included S.127(3) CCA 1974 as this account dates back to 1999 and is a credit card debt
  10. Murdoch probably owns the bank
  11. Lets go with the flow on this one Send that letter of extension to the court from cohen and see what rubbish Cohen sends back Keep the thread updated I myself would send in a defence now stating that you have no documents in which to defend, and go through the normal time scales But that is me and you have to make that choice
  12. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?391598-Link-Financial-Ltd&p=4278573#post4278573 Cannot see any connection though
×
×
  • Create New...