Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello dx100uk, After months of waiting for a response I finally got a reply and I must say it was the worst 4 months of my life the - fear of the unknown. So, they wrote back and said I was in the wrong BUT on this occasion they  would not take action but keep me on file for the next 12 months. It. was the biggest relief of my life a massive weight lifted -  I would like to thank you and the team for all your support
    • I have contacted the sofa shop who are sending someone out tomorrow to inspect the furniture. I suspect if anything a replacement will be offered although I would prefer a refund. Few photos of the wear in the material, this is how it was delivered.  
    • Yup, for goodness sake she needs to stop paying right now, DCA's are powerless, as .  Is it showing on their credit file? Best to use Check my file. All of the above advice is excellent, definitely SAR the loan company as soon as possible.
    • Hi all, I am wandering if this is appealable. It has already been through a challenge on the Islington website and the it was rejected. Basically there was a suspended bay sign on a post on Gee st which was obscured by a Pizza van. The suspension was for 3 bays outside 47 Gee st. I parked outside/between 47 & 55 Gee st. I paid via the phone system using a sign a few meters away from my car. When I got back to the car there was a PCN stuck to the windscreen which I had to dry out before I could read it due to rain getting into the plastic sticky holder.  I then appealed using the Islington website which was then rejected the next day. I have attached a pdf of images that I took and also which the parking officer took. There are two spaces in front of the van, one of which had a generator on it the other was a disabled space. I would count those as 3 bays? In the first image circled in red is the parking sign I read. In the 2nd image is the suspension notice obscured by the van. I would have had to stand in the middle of the road to read this, in fact that's where I was standing when I took the photo. I have pasted the appeal and rejection below. Many thanks for looking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is my appeal statement: As you can see from the image attached (image 1) I actually paid £18.50 to park my car in Gee st. I parked the car at what I thought was outside 55 Gee st as seen in image 2 attached. When I read the PCN issued it stated there was a parking suspension. There was no suspension notice on the sign that I used to call the payment service outside number 55 Gee st. I looked for a suspension notice and eventually found one which was obscured by a large van and generator parked outside 47 Gee st. As seen in images 3 and 4 attached. I am guessing the parking suspension was to allow the Van to park and sell Pizza during the Clerkenwell design week. I was not obstructing the use or parking of the van, in fact the van was obstructing the suspension notice which meant I could not read or see it without prior knowledge it was there. I would have had to stand in the road to see it endangering myself as I had to to take images to illustrate the hidden notice. As there was no intention to avoid a parking charge and the fact the sign was not easily visible I would hope this challenge can be accepted. Many thanks.   This is the text from the rejection: Thank you for contacting us about the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). The PCN was issued because the vehicle was parked in a suspended bay or space. I note from your correspondence that there was no suspension notice on the sign that you used to call the payment serve outside number 55 Gee Street. I acknowledge your comments, however, your vehicle was parked in a bay which had been suspended. The regulations require the suspension warning to be clearly visible. It is a large bright yellow sign and is erected by the parking bay on the nearest parking plate to the area that is to be suspended. Parking is then not permitted in the bay for any reason or period of time, however brief. The signs relating to this suspension were sited in accordance with the regulations. Upon reviewing the Civil Enforcement Officer's (CEO's) images and notes, I am satisfied that sufficient signage was in place and that it meets statutory requirements. Whilst I note that the signage may have been obstructed by a large van and generator at the time, please note, it is the responsibility of the motorist to locate and check the time plate each time they park. This will ensure that any changes to the status of the bay are noted. I acknowledge that your vehicle possessed a RingGo session at the time, however, this does not authorize parking within a suspended bay. Suspension restrictions are established to facilitate specific activities like filming or construction, therefore, we anticipate the vehicle owner to relocate the vehicle from the suspended area until the specified date and time when the suspension concludes. Leaving a vehicle unattended for any period of time within a suspended bay, effectively renders the vehicle parked in contravention and a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) may issue a PCN. Finally, the vehicle was left parked approximately 5 metres away from the closest time plate notice. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they park in a suitable parking place and check all signs and road markings prior to leaving their vehicle parked in contravention. It remains the driver's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is parked legally at all times. With that being said, I would have to inform you, your appeal has been rejected at this stage. Please see the below images as taken by the CEO whilst issuing the PCN: You should now choose one of the following options: Pay the penalty charge. We will accept the discounted amount of £65.00 in settlement of this matter, provided it is received by 10 June 2024. After that date, the full penalty charge of £130.00 will be payable. Or Wait for a Notice to Owner (NtO) to be issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle, who is legally responsible for paying the penalty charge. Any further correspondence received prior to the NtO being issued may not be responded to. The NtO gives the recipient the right to make formal representations against the penalty charge. If we reject those representations, there will be the right of appeal to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator.   Gee st pdf.pdf
    • Nationwide Building Society has launched an 18 month fixed-rate account paying 5.5%.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Laptop failure after 2 years 3 months, my rights under SoGA?


jboy81
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

New to this forum but it all looks helpful. Im sure this question has been posed here before but im just seeking clarity on my legal position.

 

Bought an £800 sony vaio laptop from Currys (for my sins) in Oct 2013. It was the most expensive windows laptop in the shop, sold to me after I explained I use it for work and it gets lots of use so needs to be a machine which will stand up to it rather than a cheap laptop that will struggle to keep pace...

 

It has been repaired once by Currys already in Summer 2014 (software failure, they reinstalled windows for me and thats about all).

 

Last week, after 2 years 3 months, it has died completely. I have returned it to Currys for them to asses, but I am expecting it could be a motherboard failure and as such pretty much a write off and time to buy a new one.

 

I have a friend who works for Currys repair centre, and he has advised me that Currys are obliged to repair or replace under the Sales of goods act regardless of warranty, something he described as retails best kept secret.

 

Having raised this point with Currys the lady was quite firm in her denial ("in thrity years of working here ive never heard of a free repair to a 2 year old machine" ...etc). She claimed that wear and tear on the key board and case showing it has been used a lot as opposed to someone using it once a week to check facebook has to be considered when assessing what is reasable to expect in terms of the life of a laptop.

 

While I take the point that number of hours use affects overall years of use, I feel that 2 years 3 months is not a reasonable time for a laptop to fail to the point of replacement, especially not for an £800 machine sold on the basis of its durability. I feel the amount of use is irrelevent given the short time frame, as to support that argument is to say that the laptop was not suitable for business use or capable of being used for anything other than light domestic home use, contrary to advice given at point of sale and contrary to the price tag.

 

Having read some other threads here I am under the impression I may be entitled to some compensation if not a full repair/replacement, on the basis that the sales of goods act states it must "reasonably not be expected to have failed" which I think is the case. The issue of "fault being present from manfacture" can only be prooved by virtue of the fact it has failed, and would only fail after time not necessarily when first purchased. If an indpendent report was needed I can arrange it, I certainly havent spilled anything or dropped it, or otherwise caused reason for it to be faulty and the nature of it being inside the laptop means its hard to really break a motherboard any other way.

 

I would appreicate advice on how to approach the issue given Currys known stubborn attitude to these problems and a better understanding of my legal rights. If needs be I will buy a new laptop (elsewhere), but I do feel I am being robbed of at least a couple of years use of a machine and therefore should be compensated towards the cost of a new one.

 

Many thanks in advance :)

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Currys are under an obligation to repair it, even after 2 years, however there is a but.

 

In order to exercise your rights, you'll need to get an independent report stating that the failure is down to a manufacturing fault rather than wear and tear, accidental damage, misuse, etc. You can usually get such a report from a local computer shop. The downside is that you will need to pay for this report up front yourself (Usually these cost around the £60 mark), however Currys will have to refund that if the report shows that it is indeed a manufacturing fault.

Once you have the report, you can contact Currys, preferably in writing, providing them with a copy of the report and asking that they fulfil their legal obligations. Now, the choice of what to do next is up to Currys, and they will go down one of the following routes,

1) Replace the laptop (Unlikely given the age and the fact that Sony no longer manufacture laptops)

2) Repair the laptop (This depends on the type of failure and how much it will cost to fix. Again, this may be difficult as parts may not be in easy supply due to the manufacturer withdrawing from the laptop business)

3) Full refund (Extremely unlikely given the age, but strange things have been known to happen. If you did get a full refund of the £800 I'd expect it to be in vouchers rather than cash)

4) The most likely option, a partial refund with a deduction for 'enjoyment'. This means that they can refund you minus an amount for the use you've already had from the laptop, based on a reasonable lifespan. If we assume a laptop should be reasonably expected to last 5 years, then your refund would be expected to be in the region of £450-500.

 

If Currys still refuse to play ball, then you'd send a LBA to Currys advising them that you expect them to either fulfil their legal obligations, or you'll be taking them to Small Claims court for the cost of the laptop. Don't make that threat unless you intended to follow through with it though, it's useless as an idle threat. Hopefully things wouldn't get that far though, but if they do we can give you more information when that happens :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Theyd likely just give like for like. So you wouldnt get a full replacement as theres no chance theyd carry tech that old now

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The very short answer here is – that you are broadly right. You can have some expectation of the repair although you may have to contribute to it.

 

Section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act requires that goods be of satisfactory quality and that they remain that way for a reasonable period of time. What is satisfactory and what is reasonable is based upon the view of a reasonable consumer's expectations.

 

In your case, you are talking about an £800 laptop and I think a reasonable way of expressing the question would be: – would a reasonable consumer expect to pay £400 per year for a laptop and then have to buy a new one.

 

Another question you might ask would be: – if Currys advertised the laptop saying "this laptop will cost you £800 and it will last you for a full two years, after which you will have to buy new one", would they sell any?

 

I think the answer to both questions is – No

 

However, the laptop has had over two years use and of course it is subject to wear and tear. I think that you have to do estimate the reasonable expected life of the machine and then calculate your contribution to the repair of the machine based on two years as a percentage of the expected life.

 

This means, for instance, that if it is reasonable to expect that the computer would last for six years, then you have had it for 30% of that time and so I would say that it would be reasonable to expect you to pay for 30% of the repair and for Currys to pay the balance

 

Currys will not accept this without a fight. I quite agree that the rights under the Sale of Goods Act are retails best kept secret. In fact the Sale of Goods Act is Currys best kept secret and as far as we can see on this forum, Currys have a rotten reputation for trying to deprive people of their statutory rights.

 

Even when computers break shortly after the expiry of the normal 12 month guarantee, people have a hard fight to assert their rights against Currys. Frankly I think there is a case for consumers to make complaints about Currys to Trading Standards because it needs an investigation into what they are doing.

 

I'm afraid that you are very likely to get to a point where you are going to have to threaten – and begin a legal action against them. Once that happens, then Currys may knuckle down but I don't expect that it will happen before then.

 

The first thing you're going to have to do is to get a diagnosis of the problem and an estimate for repair. I think you're going to have to get to estimates.

 

Have Currys given you an estimate? It would be helpful if they did. Even if they say that it is big beyond economic repair, at least you can then place a value on what you believe you are entitled to have.

 

For instance if they say that the computer is written off, then you will have to consider that Currys owe you about 66% of the purchase price.

 

Once you have done this, then you need to write a letter to Currys with the estimates and require them to pay for the repair or else you will sue them within 14 days. Don't bother to bluff this. Don't do it unless you really intend to go through it.

 

It is likely that Currys won't even bother to respond to you. Once you have issued the papers, then Currys will sit up and take notice but until that moment, they will simply disregard you and anything you have to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Thank you for your responses, very helpful indeed, it certainly seems that more people should be made aware of the SoGA as I can think of several circumstances in my life when it would have to applied to goods which I have just accepted I need to replace at cost when in fact I could have sought partial compensation (including my last laptop! Hence my grumpyness over this one).

 

As I said, I am awaiting Currys diagnosis and its possible it could still be an easy fix but in the worst case this is all valuable information.

 

I also contacted the Citizens Advice consumer helpline who were very helpful in clarifying my rights as well. Interestingly they do agree that the "reasonable wear and tear" argument is the grey area in all of this, and that if all else fails it would fall to a judge in the claims court to decide if reasonable usage had been had from the laptop before the thing packed up.

 

However they also advised me that in the event Currys did not respond or offer suitable assistance with the repair, my next step would be to contact a 3rd party conflict resolution scheme - perhaps one that Currys is a member of, or else an independent one which Citizens Advice could recommend, who would then contact the retailer to try and find a resolution suitable to both parties without going to a court claim (which lets face it is preferable for the sake of a few hundred pounds). Just thought it was worth mentioning here for anyone else digging up research, they said the small claims court should be a last resort and there are other ways to pursue the claim before reaching that point. Well worth speaking to them on issues like this as they have some good advice.

 

Thanks again for your help, I shall certainly be paying more attention to this in future and advising everyone I know of their rights!

 

Cheers

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 years 3 months even with daily use is not reasonable life span for an £800 laptop. If they find that it is just failed parts, if they tell you it is not an economic repair, offering you vouchers towards a new laptop, then ask them what parts have failed. Then try to find out elsewhere whether the repair is worthwhile and the cost. It is then working out what your best option is.

 

I find that Laptops last about 4 years, having has various different brands over the years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the laptop doesn't turn on at all? No lights, no fans etc?

 

I think you are in IT.

 

Why are Laptops more of a problem than the old workstation type boxed computers ?

 

Is it that they are cramming in so many heat affected parts into a small space and no amount of fans or ventilation will stop the parts failing early due to the gradual heat damage ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are in IT.

 

Why are Laptops more of a problem than the old workstation type boxed computers ?

 

Is it that they are cramming in so many heat affected parts into a small space and no amount of fans or ventilation will stop the parts failing early due to the gradual heat damage ?

 

Pretty much, the components are getting smaller, but they aren't as efficient with the heat. The most common failures of the motherboard in laptops I have seen are either overheating of an external graphics chip causing the cost saving ball solder joints to crack resulting most of the time with a complete blank screen. The other tends to be power related where a small component near the power jack fails with extended use, it can be other components, but usually only takes a single tiny component to fail and render the whole thing useless.

 

I wanted to check if jboy81's laptop defiantly has a mainboard failure, or if the issue could be something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you may have left it a bit too late now if the failure happened a year ago. At the time you certainly could have pushed for Currys to do something, but after so long has passed since the failure I'm not so sure.

 

It wasn't from Curry's but shouldn't the manufacturer be held responsible if their products fail after a few months…? :sad:

 

TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't from Curry's but shouldn't the manufacturer be held responsible if their products fail after a few months…? :sad:

 

TB

 

Legally speaking, no. The retailer is the one responsible, not the manufacturer. From a consumer point of view anyway. The exception would be if you purchased from the manufacturer directly.

 

But again, after so long has passed since the failure I'm not entirely sure there's anything that can be done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally speaking, no. The retailer is the one responsible, not the manufacturer. From a consumer point of view anyway. The exception would be if you purchased from the manufacturer directly.

 

But again, after so long has passed since the failure I'm not entirely sure there's anything that can be done.

 

I'm sure there is, It should last a "reasonable length of time" which should be around 5 years. You'd have to argue this with the retailer as they will try to get out of it. I had a laptop fail after a year and 5 days, I wish I had known about the SOGA back then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help if there was some independent guide on product lifespan to be expected by consumers. If there was such a guide (if it is possible) then it would help consumers know what they should expect.

 

Of course retailers and manufacturers would hate this, because it might affect the number of faulty products being returned for repair or replacement. I should imagine most people just throw away faulty items, rather than pursue retailers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure there is, It should last a "reasonable length of time" which should be around 5 years. You'd have to argue this with the retailer as they will try to get out of it. I had a laptop fail after a year and 5 days, I wish I had known about the SOGA back then!

Oh I agree that there is rules that products should last a reasonable length of time. The issue here though is that the failure occurred more than a year ago and it went unreported to the retailer. Can you go to the retailer, even if you're within that 5 years, and say "My laptop/tablet failed over a year ago and I'd like to have it fixed" ? I'd imagine that there is an expectation/requirement that failures are also reported inside of a reasonable timeframe, not more than a year after the fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 years 3 months even with daily use is not reasonable life span for an £800 laptop. If they find that it is just failed parts, if they tell you it is not an economic repair, offering you vouchers towards a new laptop, then ask them what parts have failed. Then try to find out elsewhere whether the repair is worthwhile and the cost. It is then working out what your best option is.

 

I find that Laptops last about 4 years, having has various different brands over the years.

 

My laptops last on average 8 years. They get a workout so I tend to have to find an excuse to buy a new model. I don't think 4 years is long enough when you've spent £800 on a laptop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was pretty miffed when my iPad completely died just after the one year guarantee ran out... that was about a year ago. Wondering if there is anything I can do about it after all that time, though...

 

TB

 

Take it to the retailer and if they refuse to fix it, take it to Apple. I found them very helpful when my daughters hard drive failed on her iMac. The retailer gave me the runaround for months. In the end Apple replaced the hard drive free of charge because of all the stress I'd suffered trying to get the retailer to fix it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't agree with some of the generalisation that's being ported here

sadly by known industry workers or those that were in the game for the major retailers.

I might add.

 

 

it matters not if/if not the user reports a fault within any timeframe of it happening.

the user could just as simply lie and say it happened yesterday it makes no odds

the item failed

 

 

be it 1yrs , or 5 days out side of any manu guarantee [which is totally useless anyway]

and does not replace your statutory rights under soga or the consumer rights act.

 

 

the item has failed within what could be deemed as a reasonable time

the goods should have been expected to have lasted for...

 

 

whatever was paid for the goods ..is immaterial under the guidelines.

just because something by rolls Royce costs 200 times the price of a fiat 500

does not mean the fiat is allowed to be produced without the same care toward the end user.

 

 

reasonable time is the key word here

and say to say that a product of just over +2yrs has reached its life is rather poor....

 

 

it might well be correct that 'the use of the product' plays a part in what can be reasonably claimed

in return for a working item...or any other solution.

 

 

but there are, quite correctly, no hard and fast rules upon how long any one product might last.

 

 

it certainly does not allow retailers to brush off any claim as its outside of any warranty or guarantee

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take it to the retailer and if they refuse to fix it, take it to Apple. I found them very helpful when my daughters hard drive failed on her iMac. The retailer gave me the runaround for months. In the end Apple replaced the hard drive free of charge because of all the stress I'd suffered trying to get the retailer to fix it.

 

It was purchased from an Apple store in Hong Kong… TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't agree with some of the generalisation that's being ported here

sadly by known industry workers or those that were in the game for the major retailers.

I might add.

 

 

it matters not if/if not the user reports a fault within any timeframe of it happening.

the user could just as simply lie and say it happened yesterday it makes no odds

the item failed

 

 

be it 1yrs , or 5 days out side of any manu guarantee [which is totally useless anyway]

and does not replace your statutory rights under soga or the consumer rights act.

 

 

the item has failed within what could be deemed as a reasonable time

the goods should have been expected to have lasted for...

 

 

whatever was paid for the goods ..is immaterial under the guidelines.

just because something by rolls Royce costs 200 times the price of a fiat 500

does not mean the fiat is allowed to be produced without the same care toward the end user.

 

 

reasonable time is the key word here

and say to say that a product of just over +2yrs has reached its life is rather poor....

 

 

it might well be correct that 'the use of the product' plays a part in what can be reasonably claimed

in return for a working item...or any other solution.

 

 

but there are, quite correctly, no hard and fast rules upon how long any one product might last.

 

 

it certainly does not allow retailers to brush off any claim as its outside of any warranty or guarantee

 

Yep… we bought two iPads… one for me and one for my son… mine packed up just after 12 months, my son's is still working perfectly after 2 years… there's no rhyme or reason for it… the manufacturer should replace it…TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was purchased from an Apple store in Hong Kong… TB

 

When you buy abroad, you should ask for the international warranty and not the local version. This was the case the last time i heard about the topic of buying electronic products abroad. I believe in Airports Duty Free, they tend to offer the international warranty automatically, because a local warranty is not going to be much good to a foreign traveller just passing through.

 

Check the warranty to see if it is international. Ideally you should have registered the product against your UK address, but it does not matter if you did not.

 

The warranty is not the limit of your rights. Where a product fails within reasonable expected lifespan, you can claim against the manufacturers. But you should get it inspected to see what has failed and to get confirmation that the item has been looked after properly, not taken apart and messed around with.

 

It might not be too late to pursue this with Apple.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you buy abroad, you should ask for the international warranty and not the local version. This was the case the last time i heard about the topic of buying electronic products abroad. I believe in Airports Duty Free, they tend to offer the international warranty automatically, because a local warranty is not going to be much good to a foreign traveller just passing through.

 

Check the warranty to see if it is international. Ideally you should have registered the product against your UK address, but it does not matter if you did not.

 

The warranty is not the limit of your rights. Where a product fails within reasonable expected lifespan, you can claim against the manufacturers. But you should get it inspected to see what has failed and to get confirmation that the item has been looked after properly, not taken apart and messed around with.

 

It might not be too late to pursue this with Apple.

 

No… it's been looked after properly and has not been taken apart. We think it's a motherboard failure. I think it was a local warranty, but we phoned Apple UK and they said they could replace it at a cost of £300 as it was out of warranty… Pfft!! TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...