Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN from LONDON PARKING SOLUTIONS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3644 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

God I love this site, helped me out a lot in the past.

 

I was on Jury Service

- their car park was full so I parked opposite in a huge practically empty carpark midweek (pub & 1/2 dozen shops)

 

put my disabled badge up and was gone for several hours.

 

Got out of the car at 9.35 (cos I looked at my watch) and got a ticket at 09.43!

 

The reason stated for fine is 'Left Site Not in Premises' pay £60 within 14 days or £100.

 

By reading these messages it seems the advice is to ignore it.

....I was so tempted to pay it to get it out of the way but I can't really afford it

- should I write to them and appeal it says 'all cases will be considered on their individual merits' .

 

.. Any advice would be good as I don't want to end up with a £100 fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It is NOT a fine. At all. In any way.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could appeal it, so your back is covered.

 

What signs were in the parking area?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What rights? There is no authority to charge on private land by a third party company.

 

Any road marking etc have no legal standings and a disabled badge has no legal standing on private land.

 

 

Put simply, you are falling for their tricks.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst Blue Badges do not have any legal standing on private land the BPA Ltd CoP (version 3) places certain obligations on operators where concessions are made for disabled people

 

"16.5 If your landowner provides a concession that allows parking for disabled people, if a vehicle displays a valid Blue Badge you must not issue it with parking charge notices".

 

So long as there was some indication of a concession (any concession) for disabled motorists then paragraph 16.5 kicks in.

 

My advice to you would be not to respond to the notice given at the time but to wait until the registered keeper gets a Notice through the post (courtesy of the DVLA)

 

Just as a final note,

the issue of the Notice at the time was only minutes after you'd parked up and the fact that it's for leaving the site

suggests that the parking attendant stood there and watched you leave.

 

If you can dig out the case of Ron Ibbotson V VCS the District Judge made it clear that landowners

and their agents have a duty to mitigate their losses and was extremely critical of the parking attendant

who did precisely the same as what appears to have happened in your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the op says

it was not a disabled bay....

 

and there were signs with a disabled symbol with a line through ..

 

so again ...nothing to do with any disabled parking concessions.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the op says

it was not a disabled bay....

 

and there were signs with a disabled symbol with a line through ..

 

so again ...nothing to do with any disabled parking concessions.

 

BPA Ltd CoP Version 3 (page 9)

 

16.1 The Equality Act 2010 says that providers of services to the public must make ‘reasonable adjustments’ to remove

barriers which may discriminate against disabled people.

 

16.2 ‘Reasonable adjustments’ to prevent discrimination are likely to include larger ‘disabled’ parking spaces near to the

entrance or amenities for disabled people whose mobility is impaired. It also could include lowered payment machines and other ways to pay if payment is required: for example, paying by phone. You and your staff also need to realise that some disabled people may take a long time to get to the payment machine.

 

16.3 Operators of off-street car parks do not have to recognise the Blue Badge scheme. But many choose to

do so to meet their obligations under the Equality Act. Although a Blue Badge is not issued to all disabled people

it is issued to those with mobility problems. So it is a good way for parking operators to identify people who

need special parking provision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you were ticketed was "left site". This has already been proven at a court that this doesnt matter and therefore the issuing of the ticket cannot properly be taken further. You canwrite to the company and appeal, saying that the conditions of parking do not exclude going elsewhere (dont say that you wre ONLY elsewhere) and that this has been subject to a court decision and therefore you are not obliged to pay a fee for parking as you did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a parking ticket in the little yellow bag - shall I appeal? it says in the small print should my appeal be rejected 'you will be provided details of how to refer the matter to an independent appeals service. Parking on Private Land appeals (POPLA).

 

no that's just my wording its a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) in a little yellow bag.

 

Ah...thanks for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh. So you can appeal to popla. Should be straightforward enough. Sit tight and youll get some good info and a good reason to appeal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you were ticketed was "left site". This has already been proven at a court that this doesnt matter and therefore the issuing of the ticket cannot properly be taken further. You canwrite to the company and appeal, saying that the conditions of parking do not exclude going elsewhere (dont say that you wre ONLY elsewhere) and that this has been subject to a court decision and therefore you are not obliged to pay a fee for parking as you did.

 

I strongly advise against this because it requires you to identify the driver and therefore you surrender in one fell swoop the defences afforded to the registered keeper under PoFA.

 

Keep your powder dry, follow my advice and wait for the NtK (courtesy of the DVLA)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I thought the NtD was placed on the vehicle at the time (20th October 2013) therefore LPS cannot apply for RK data (Under PoFA) until 28 days after the 20th October and then they have a window to serve a NtK which doesn't close until a further 28 days (making 56 days in total) after the date of the original contravention.

 

Have I missed something here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've got a letter from London Parking Solutions dated Dec 17th saying I must now pay £100 and have 28 days to appeal or else a debt collection agency will be involved.....I went on Street View to look at Thames Road London (The Princess Alice Pub) and although you can see disabled parking bays I was not in one (the disable badge was on the dash board I also note they have cameras on the car park. Presumably that's how they know I left the car park.

 

Now I ignored the original PCN....but it does say on the back of this letter I can appeal via email to them but "if my appeal is rejected you will be provided with details of how to refer the matter to an Independent Appeals Service ("IAS), along with a unique reference number. Any appeal you make to the IAS will be rejected unless you have first followed our own appeals service. Please note, if you DO appeal to the IAS and your appeal is rejected, you will lose the option to pay the reduced amount".

 

Please help me with what you would reply or the wording for my appeal. This just adds to the stress, but I kept my powder dry! God I hope you all can help me.....

Edited by Mollierose8
add a bit more
Link to post
Share on other sites

How was the letter addressed to you? As driver or RK of the vehicle? Did they invite you to name the driver at the time and do they mention pursuing the RK if the driver is not identified.

As for leaving the car park, that reason for ticketing was blown out of the water ages ago.

Appeal on the grounds of no loss caused by your action and that £100 is a penalty, not an estimate of loss. they will reject this but give you the all-important POPLA ref no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a point of interest you could ask them as RK how are you supposed to know about the ticket discount period if the driver doesnt tell you about the ticket. Dont mention the defence for leaving car park as at this stage they havent identified the driver and are not chasing you are the driver but keeper of the vehicle. Make them do the work and hopefully the mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...