Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EPC ANPR PCN - Lease car - overstay- M&B - Old White Lion - East Finchley **CANCELLED BY PUB**


Recommended Posts

Hi again

Embarrassingly, this is the second PCN I have received from a Private Company in 2023! 

 I have not had a parking ticket for years before this and now 2 in the space of 6 months!

I met a friend at a pub which I have visited many times in the past and often parked in their car park when there was space. 

As it was a quiet evening i thought nothing of it that there were spaces available, had a drink, chatted to my friend and went home. 

I saw no signs at all, either on my way in or on my way out!

I was shocked a few days later when I received an email from the company I lease my car from that I had been given a PCN - see attached. 

Following advice on here i did nothing. 

I then received a notice to hirer around mid December and then a Final Notification Letter on 20 Jan 2024. 

I have not responded at all.

What is the best move now?

Thanks everyone!

Laoise

 

 

EPC NTH+NTK+Final notice .pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this:

please dont forget next time to READ upload and REDACT letters you put up!! and we need bothsides of every letter too. one multipage pdf for them all is acceptable.

ive done if for you this time

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EPC ANPR PCN - Lease car - overstay- M&B - Old White Lion - East Finchley

I see that you received the original PCN that was sent to Leaseplan as well as your Notice to Hirer. Did you also receive a copy of your Hire contract and a copy of your agreement that you are responsible for parking tickets etc.?

They have already made one mistake with their Notice to Hirer inasmuch as they should have given you 23 days to respond rather than the usual 28 days.  Could you please confirm that the other documents  were sent to you along with the PCNs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 28/11/2023

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 05/12/2023
 

3 Date received 13/12/2023 (via email from leasing company)
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N
 

7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Old White Lion pub, East Finchley
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

Notice to Hirer dated 14/12/2023

Final Notification Letter dated 20/01/2024

I also received 2 letters from Leaseplan:

1. to let me know that ":We have given your details to the relevant authority transferring liability of this offence to you."

2. THIRD PARTY AUTHORISATION LETTER

Hi - I didnt receive a copy of my hire contract or copy of the agreement. 

Would Leaseplan need to have sent this or the parking company? 

I received a letter from Leaseplan telling me that they had received the pcn and then a third party authorisation letter - see redacted items attached 

 

 

 

docs1 .pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call or visit the pub and tell them to call off their dogs, they wil say it's out of their hands but it isn't, they can and should tell EuroCP to cease action.

Get on the Pub's social channels and do the same if they don't respond favorably to your visit/call

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

again you put up a whole series of single page PDF files that were NOT redacted properly..:frusty:

when told how to properly redact by following our upload guide on how to do it as one mass file..............

do you want these people to find you here.

sorted again and merged to one file.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for posting that information-it puts you in the clear so you do not owe them a penny even if the best lawyer in the Country goes with Euro Car Parks to Court. 

They have made a number of errors -the major one being the Notic to Hirer. That is the most important document for them since in order to win in Court ECP have to comply with The protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  Section 13 and 14 of the Act relate to hire vehicles. S13 is more to do with the Hire company while S14 deals with the hirer and what ECP has to do to comply with the Act.

There first mistake is although they state that they sent you a Notice to Hirer, they have by allowing you 28 days to pay the invoice effectively sent you a Notice to Keeper. Hirers only get 21 days grace to settle the bill. That in itself is enough to kill their case as they have failed to comply with one of the provisions of the Act. And they have tocomply with them all to be able to be able to pursue you.

They then compound their error by asking for the name and address of the driver if you were not the driver. This is necessary with a Notice to Keeper but not on a Notice to Hirer because hen it doesn't matter who was driving ony the hirer is responsible. As ther is no mention of who was driving in the Hire section of the Act, your PCN is not compliant.

And by not sending the Hire contract and the agreement of your responsibility for parking tickets etc they confirmed that not only are they complete idiots [which we already knew] but further ensured that you are not liable at all.

The original PCN to the Lease company is also non compliant but not worth adding since you already more than killer their case. And I doubt that "Your vehicle was not authorised to park" is actually stated on their sign age in the car park.

So need to stress. Just relax and laugh at heir stupid letter from them and their unregulated debt collectors.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Lookinforinfo, FTMDAve, DX100uk and Homer67 for helping me.  I feel pretty stupid for not following the protocols for posting attachments.  Thank you for helping with this too!

So, from what I have understood, I can just go to the pub (or social media) and ask them to stop Euro Parks from hounding me.  But apart from that I can do nothing as its unlikely they would be able to win in court anyway so they wont pursue me.  Have I got that right?

Thank you

Laoise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you've seen in your other thread where appeals get you - nowhere.

The pub, on the other hand, will have the power to call their dogs off - and will want to keep customers.

Of course it won't be as easy as that, it will depend if the pub itself called in EPC or if it was head office in case of a chain - but the pub is your starting point.

Is it easy for you to go back there?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Elle you are not dealing with a proper company. They have been in the parking business for years but are still incapable of issuing a correct PCN. Now whilse that is good news for you as they are still blissfully unaware that their PCN is not compliant and even if they did know, it still won't stop them trying to scare you into paying.

All you can do is totally ignore all their threats safe in the knowledge that they have no chance of winning and have a good laugh at their expense. However one day they may decide to issue you with a Letter  before claim or a letter of Claim. Please do not ignore those but let us know so we can advise on your next move.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read the correspondence from Leaseplan to you, you also need to inform them that they CANNOT charge an admin fee for their part in this.

It is NOT a Penalty Charge, nor is it a fine. It is simply a speculative invoice. (Check your lease agreement for the wording).

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nicky Boy

I have just checked and this is the relevant clause:

  • an administration fee of up to £25.00 (including VAT) each time we receive and process a fixed penalty, fine, congestion or other charge in connection with the Vehicle or its use. In addition if we pay such charges on your behalf you shall reimburse us in respect of the such payment (see paragraph 2.2 of the Terms and Conditions)

Is this contrary to legislation? 

BTW they did not automatically pay the Parking Charge Notices from Alliance Parking or Euro Parks, but they did pay a Penalty Charge Notice from TFL Red Routes (which I also contested at the time as the sign implied we could park there at specific times to load - but my appeal was rejected).

£25 does seem a lot though for just forwarding an email!

Thanks

Laoise

Link to post
Share on other sites

a speculative invoice is none of those

its a civil private parking contractual matter.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - demand the money back, and if they don't play ball go and do chargeback through your bank.

On Google Maps the pub seem to take customer service very seriously and reply to every single review.  So phoning and asking for the manager, or even better going in if the place isn't too far from you, is the road to go down.

 

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ELLE17 said:

BTW they did not automatically pay the Parking Charge Notices from Alliance Parking or Euro Parks, but they did pay a Penalty Charge Notice from TFL Red Routes

Which shows that they DO know the difference...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks for everyone’s help with this pcn.  

I finally had an opportunity go to the pub with the letters and told them I was drinking in their pub that night

they immediately cancelled the ticket.  

They said they put it in place because lots of people were leaving their cars in the car park all day and hopping on the tube.

Once I told them I was legit it was all cancelled. 
i have not yet tackled my lease company but will do so in the next week.  


thanks again everyone

- where do I go to acknowledge a success?

Laoise

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done!!

thread title updated.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to EPC ANPR PCN - Lease car - overstay- M&B - Old White Lion - East Finchley **CANCELLED BY PUB**

Congratulations Elle!

1 hour ago, ELLE17 said:

- where do I go to acknowledge a success?

There is a donate button further down the page...😝

We're all volunteers, but there are overheads to actually run the website.

And go get that "admin fee" back...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ELLE17 said:

they immediately cancelled the ticket.

Have you actually got anything to confirm this?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

That is good news Elle. If you send the Cancellation message  to Leaseplan to show you  hadn't breached anything that might convince them to repay you.

Even if the Pub hadn't cancelled your ticket you still wouldn't have had to pay a penny had it got to Court because ECP did not comply with PoFA. But you would have been deluged with threats from unregulated debt collectors in the meantime.

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your victory will make it easier to get the admin charge back.

We've had a few cases recently of car hire companies mixing up (or pretending to mix up) Penalty Charge Notices with invoices from a private company.  So Caggers have had to argue it out with them.

But in your case not only was it not a Penalty Charge Notice but it has also been cancelled!

So write to them and demand your money back on the basis that

On 08/02/2024 at 16:23, ELLE17 said:
  • an administration fee of up to £25.00 (including VAT) each time we receive and process a fixed penalty, fine, congestion charge

(a) the invoice was none of these and (b) it has been cancelled by the landowner (obviously attach proof).

As it's in their interests to try to keep the £25, in parallel look up your bank's web pages re chargeback.

Hopefully all will go well but if Leaseplan faff around as soon as you can demand a chargeback through your bank.

BTW, I'd heard all this "chargeback" stuff on the forum but had never been in the position to need one until a year ago.  In my case I had paid for train tickets that were never purchased as the site crashed during purchase.  I wrote to the train company - no reply.  I looked up my bank's chargeback pages - they said I had to give the trader the chance to remedy matters and if they didn't I could do chargeback after 14 days.  The train company never replied.  After 14 days I got on to the bank (RBS).  My money was refunded.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...