Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre   Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 22 May 2024   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300  and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984.   What is the total value of the claim? £385   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier   What was the date of your last payment? Never    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No  
    • Their FAQs state - Cancellations and modifications If your booking has been cancelled, Booking.com refunds you immediately. The processing time may take 7 to 10 days and depends on your bank. If you have questions, contact your bank directly. I'm a regular Booking.com and AirBnB user.  The former have never cancelled.  The latter have and my money was refunded immediately (not that that helps you as we're not talking about AirBnB!) Best to check with your bank and see (a) if you did pay in advance and (b) if it has been refunded. Also, have you received a message from Booking.com officially stating the cancellation?
    • I'm not up to date with the Legal Aid rules but I'm not sure that many people qualify. HB
    • You question timescales a bit in thread - From my experience, defaulting everything and ignoring all non PAP letters, while making no payments: - 18 months to LOC - further 18 months to be at court Most are still silent 3 years in though!. If making token payments, court, if ever would be 4-5-6 years from now - Hope that helps. My debt is similar, I started it 2021 and wouldn't believe I'm already over half way through default period. You need to make the decisions but follow advice already given in this thread, and you will be fine. Best time to plant a tree was yesterday, second best time is today. Good luck BT  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid CTAX direct to coucil - Equita bailiff want 'fees'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caggers

 

Just need a bit of advice,

 

 

I defaulted on a repayment plan with a bailiff July 2014,

 

 

they recently sent me a letter saying that there was an outstanding amount of £163.86 that I needed to pay straight away

or a bailiff was coming to my house at the weekend.

 

 

I phoned the council and paid them directly and wiped the debt.

 

 

When I called the bailiff to tell them that I have paid the balance of in full

the lad on the phone said that I have made things worse for myself as I had to pay Equita not the council

and that they would not stop the bailiff coming round.

 

 

Since the call I emailed Equita with proof of payment.

 

If a bailiff came to my property at the weekend,

 

 

can he charge me their extortionate rate still even thou I have paid and informed them?

TIA

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the debt for?

 

As a general rule, yes,

 

 

he will continue to enforce for his fees

 

 

and that may incur further costs,

 

 

but we need a little bit more info.

 

 

You are better contacting him and paying whats owed now to stop a further attendance imho.

 

Have you read somewhere about paying direct to stop enforcement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its for council tax.

 

There is no more debt to pay,

 

I have paid it all off in full to the council.

 

There was no fees to pay.

 

I don't know the bailiffs name as the letter was sent from their office and signed 'Bailiff enforcement'

 

I payed the council direct because it was them who I owed not Equita.

 

I have proof of payment e.g receipt and bank statement which I have emailed to their office

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

the old dodge of paying the council does not work anymore!

 

 

if you've had the first letter that's £75 you owe the bailiff.

 

 

UNLESS the original payment plan existed before april 2014.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like fotl advice to me. You should NEVER follow that advice for a debt. Ever.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sash is old school here

prob doesn't realise the rules changed.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The old dodge, what are you on about,

you might be site team,

 

i was mearly asking for advice, and you start saying im old school,

 

all my other posts that i have put on here in the past where you have popped up on,

i havnt followed any of your advice,

and guess what this is the only out standing debt i have. and why?

because i got the right advice of the right people.

 

so you can stick your site and advice right up your corn hole.

 

you clearly are on the side of the system

 

the old dodge of paying the council does not work anymore!

 

if you've had the first letter that's £75 you owe the bailiff.

 

UNLESS the original payment plan existed before april 2014.

 

dx

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

The old way of dealing with council tax bailiffs was to pay the council direct

 

That dodge does not work anymore ie cutting out the bailiff does not work

Things have changed

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the first post, a repayment plan with the bailiff was already in place,

so any fees (at least the first £75) should already have been included in the total amount outstanding

which was communicated to the OP in the recent letter.

 

If the amount in the letter was paid quickly, it shouldn't matter who it was paid to.

If paid to the council, any fees due would be forwarded to the bailiff in due course,

if paid to the bailiff, the fees would be deducted and the excess forwarded to the council.

 

If the bailiff company told you that £163.86 was outstanding, then it is entirely reasonable to expect that £163.86

and ONLY £163.86 was outstanding, not that amount plus fees.

 

I would contact the council and find out how much is outstanding on the LO,

from that figure and from how much you have paid in total,

you can work out how much you have paid the bailiff in fees.

 

Don't wait, do this first thing tomorrow morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wasnt cutting anyone out

 

the letter they sent me clearly states that there is an outstanding balence that is owed to the council and needs to be paid,

 

i paid it to the council.

it does not say who i have to pay it to only who i owe it to.

 

and as for the abuse,

dx does my head in as i was only looking for advice

not 1 part was i tried to be old school.

 

how do i close my account on here

....... has got better advice and higher success

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOTL follower.

 

 

I rest my case.

 

 

Sash, you might not want to hear this but the law was changed last year.

 

 

Regardless of who you pay now,

 

 

the debt is split between the two companies.

 

 

Council and bailiffs.

 

 

So if you try to ignore the bailiffs after they have added their fees, it wont work.

 

 

You still have to pay those fees.

 

 

*****, i admit, have success in some areas. But not this.

 

 

They are still under the impression that the law didnt change and they can do what they like.

 

 

They cant, and it has ended up making a lot of people worse off.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wasnt cutting anyone out the letter they sent me clearly states that there is an outstanding balence that is owed to the council and needs to be payed, so i payed it to the council. it does not say who i have to pay it to only who i owe it to.

and as for the abuse, dx does my head in as i was only looking for advice not 1 part was i tried to be old school.

how do i close my account on here

..... has got better advice and higher success

 

See ya close the door on the way out

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all up for FMOTL'bashing, but when did this become a case of trying to avoid bailiff fees ?

 

A letter was received and the specified amount was paid. So how can their now be bailiff fees outstanding, if a visit has not taken place ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs probably charged for the 75 letter. So they could chase for that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £75 compliance fee has been incurred at the point of sending the notice of enforcement out.

 

 

Therefore there are now bailiff fees outstanding.

 

He paid the council what he owed minus the fee is my guess

 

 

and now he is having a hissy fit

 

 

now that he knows it has to be paid.

 

 

And as normal,

 

 

aggression comes out when they realise they are wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many times can they charge the £75 fee ?

 

Bear in mind that the OP was already in a payment plan with the bailiff, so the original (pre payment plan) letter from the bailiff would have triggered the £75 fee.

 

If they were charging £75 for this latest letter, it would be included in the £163.86 the letter says was owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP probably never had a letter in the first place, just wanted some free advertising for their beloved group and a bash at cag.

He/She is probably now off worshipping a shrine of wesley ahmed, or sending a letter to jay brad in prison

 

For Anyone who wants a quick read of an excellent description of fmotl, type in "rational wiki freemen on the land" on a search engine, and have a read of the article. (Especially the freemen successes part!)

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and there was me trying to be diplomatic

having already read the OP's previous thread and thinking they were 'old school'

as the last CTAX threads were prior to april 2014, and the new rules

not they were a fotl twaddle follower.....

 

 

we live and learn.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong

I HAVE FOLLOWED ALOT OF ADVICE FROM PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, AND IT MADE ME REALISE MY RIGHT AND WHAT I WAS DOING WRONG.......NOW I'M DOING IT RIGHT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeman of the land and the pathetic ideas of Reginald Austin and Wesley Ahmed just show how pathetic and delusional these people are. Take a look at the fact that one of the numpties has been banged up for 18 weeks cos he thought he didn't have to obey any rules of society like the rest of us. Don't drop the soap jay brad. Muppet. Fact is you take advice from the delusional idiots who are 'freemen' or anyone on the beat the bailiffs group then you deserve whatever happens to you. Man up and sort your situation out and don't try and avoid a circumstance you've created yourself by trying to ignore it and thinking it's gonna go away

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...