Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

work programme after 2 years


bcham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got a letter today about them sanctioning me for not doing the charity shop. Here's a copy of the letter

 

Mandatory Work Activity

 

Good Cause Letter (JSA)

 

Dear Miss .........

 

A doubt has arisen on your entitlement to Jobseeker's Allowance because it appears that you have failed to take part in Mandatory Work Activity by failing to undertake the activity that Learn Direct told you to do.

 

We have been told that on 22/10/13 you began your period of Mandatory Work Activity at Cat Rescue Charity Shop, Warrington but on the same date you had left the placement without permission and have not returned since.

 

Will you please rely overleaf in writing within 7 days from the date of this letter to explain why you did not complete this activity. Please reply in the pre-paid envelope provided.

We will decide if your benefit will be affected, and we will let you know what effect the decision has on your jobseeker's Allowance and/or the award of National Insurance credits.

 

As long as you are still looking for work, you should continue to provide signed declarations as normal.

 

Payment of Jobseeker's Allowance will not be affected until the decision has been made.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Tracy Dixon

 

Manager

 

 

I really like the part where it says I left the placement without permission and have not returned since.

 

The more I think about it the more angry and shocked I am about the woman in the charity shop having a go at me and then my neighbour. He looked really embarrassed and was surprised that I (someone coming to volunteer) was treated that way.

 

I have done charity shops before on new deal and they made no difference to my job seeking.

 

Time to think of the reply to the letter, not that it will make any difference and I'll still get sanctioned

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My ex-husband is on ESA and has been on the WP (with Seetec) for 2 years this coming January. What happens then? Should he tell them he no longer needs to attend and stop going? Does him doing the 2 years while on ESA mean that he doesn't have to do any more?

Are you sure it's Work Programme and not Work Choice?

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like the part where it says I left the placement without permission and have not returned since.

 

The more I think about it the more angry and shocked I am about the woman in the charity shop having a go at me and then my neighbour. He looked really embarrassed and was surprised that I (someone coming to volunteer) was treated that way.

[...]

Time to think of the reply to the letter, not that it will make any difference and I'll still get sanctioned

 

Can you recall anything said that could be construed as a dismissal or refusal on the part of this woman at the charity shop ?

 

Don't forget you have an independent witness - Perhaps your friend would be willing to write a statement to corroborate events.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it's Work Programme and not Work Choice?

 

Definitely Work Programme. They call themselves a Work Programme Provider and talk about the Work Programme that he is on because he's in ESA WRAG. DWP threaten sanctions if Seetec report he failed to turn up for an appointment. I've never heard of "Work Choice".

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ex-husband is on ESA and has been on the WP (with Seetec) for 2 years this coming January. What happens then? Should he tell them he no longer needs to attend and stop going? Does him doing the 2 years while on ESA mean that he doesn't have to do any more?

 

He'll return to the Jobcentre for Post Work Programme Support. He doesn't need to inform anyone, the Jobcentre will send a letter about two weeks before he's due to go back. His time with the WP will end exactly 104 weeks after the day he was referred to the WP by the Jobcentre, not the time he started with the WP (i.e. his first induction meeting).

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll return to the Jobcentre for Post Work Programme Support. He doesn't need to inform anyone, the Jobcentre will send a letter about two weeks before he's due to go back. His time with the WP will end exactly 104 weeks after the day he was referred to the WP by the Jobcentre, not the time he started with the WP (i.e. his first induction meeting).

 

Thanks for that. Have you any idea what then happens next with ESA claimants?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Have you any idea what then happens next with ESA claimants?

 

There's a lot to read but all the information about the PWPS is here: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exit_reports_hit_squads_and_the#incoming-403920

 

And this is the specific one for ESA although it may be out of date: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/172593/response/421842/attach/html/6/ESA%20Post%20Work%20Programme%20Support.pdf.html

Edited by JustInterested
Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely Work Programme. They call themselves a Work Programme Provider and talk about the Work Programme that he is on because he's in ESA WRAG. DWP threaten sanctions if Seetec report he failed to turn up for an appointment. I've never heard of "Work Choice".

https://www.gov.uk/work-choice

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter today about them sanctioning me for not doing the charity shop. Here's a copy of the letter

 

[...]

 

I really like the part where it says I left the placement without permission and have not returned since.

 

The more I think about it the more angry and shocked I am about the woman in the charity shop having a go at me and then my neighbour. He looked really embarrassed and was surprised that I (someone coming to volunteer) was treated that way.

 

I have done charity shops before on new deal and they made no difference to my job seeking.

 

Time to think of the reply to the letter, not that it will make any difference and I'll still get sanctioned

 

emma, i think one of the posts below yours is a good idea - asking your neighbour to write a statement, so you can include it as evidence of how you were treated when you arrived at the charity shop. hopefully they'll go easier on you, because you had a valid reason for leaving, as opposed to someone who just didn't bother turning up.

 

personally i think it's fair enough that you left when the manager was being a cow. it's disgraceful how the unemployed are treated in this country - i've just been reading on the "boycott workfare" website about how companies like tesco have been working jobseekers like dogs, not paying them and then deliberately not giving them a job, so the company can have more free labour :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard of other weekly signers getting "paid" weekly. Fortnightly payments are the norm, so I would suggest that what you have experienced is not unusual.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

I have an appointment for my post work programme next monday (16th december), I have a few questions that I hope you don't mind please helping me with if you can.

 

First problem is I was put on the work programme back in December 2011, I went once to the induction then I got a job that ended in May this year so had to sign back on, I was told I would be referred back onto the work programme, yet I never got anyone in touch with me, I told two advisers when i signed on 2 separate occasions that I had heard nothing, I was told "good luck with them getting in touch as they are busy" and "just wait until they get in touch as they will", after a while I thought sod it! If they werent going to get in touch then tough luck, so what do I say if asked how the WP went at this appointment?

 

Second problem is I live with my parents (I am 37) as things are so bad for me moneywise, and they have put their house up for sale to move back up north where we are from(we live in warwickshire), and I am going with them, obviously if I got a fantastic job i would stay, but that is looking unlikely, and they could sell the house any day-so what would happen if I signed off? If they happened to sell the house before my PWP appointment for example and I signed off- what would happen when I sign on up north? Would my claim start again, or would I continue where I left off? Or does anyone know what gap I would have to have of signing off to signing back on that I would start a fresh claim?

 

The staff at my jobcentre have been usually really good, but who knows when it comes to this PWP, I think it is disgusting that I only worked 7 months ago, a job that lasted a year and a half and ended through no fault of my own- yet I am to be treat like I have never worked in the last two years, its crazy! Thank you all so much x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forums.

 

There's a lot of variance between procedures - often even between individual Jobcentres - and your claim may continue as it was or they may make you start the whole sorry mess over again from scratch. I know some things can be 'carried over' or put on hold (such as sanctions; trust the DWP to cover that one!)

 

Hopefully someone here will be able to give more information - we have some current and ex-DWP people among the members.

 

Regarding how you're treated, one thing can be honestly said for the DWP; they treat everyone the same whether they've worked solidly all their life or have never worked at all. All they're concerned about is the fact you're unemployed now . Everyone is lumped in together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is anyone on this new job seekers commitment yet as aposed to the job seekers agreement ? if so how much difference does it make if any ?. my advisor told me last thirsday i only have to attend jcp on a fortnight now as if im going to get a job ill find it myself which i could of told him 4 months ago when i started the 6 month back to the jobcentre mullarky. he then went on to say soon my job seekers agreement would be being changed to a job seekers commitment where he said it would be acceptable to take 2 days to fill in a job application. its all gone crazy either that or i have as it just dosnt add up. at one time it was apply for jobs now im being told its not all about the number of jobs you apply for so either he,s lost it or i have so some-one please tell me whats going on now :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the DWP and Jobcentres are simply not able to cope with all the requirements of jobseeking now. All very well dreaming up schemes they'd like us to do but they simply don't have the time or man-power to carry it all out..luckily for us, as most of their 'help' is worse than useless, as we've all found.

 

If they can only spare a few minutes every 2 weeks to see people when they sign on then they're really going to struggle if they try to increase everything; there's only so much they can actually check up on as it all takes time which they haven't got. Catch-22 in a way.

 

Maybe they should take on some more staff and create a few thousand jobs for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the letter from the job centre today telling me I have been sanctioned for not doing the mandatory work activity at the charity shop

 

It says my money has stopped for 13 weeks from the 28th nov to 26th feb

 

Does anyone know if I will be able to get hardship and how long will it take to get a payment, also will my housing benefit be affected

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the letter from the job centre today telling me I have been sanctioned for not doing the mandatory work activity at the charity shop

 

It says my money has stopped for 13 weeks from the 28th nov to 26th feb

 

Does anyone know if I will be able to get hardship and how long will it take to get a payment, also will my housing benefit be affected

hi ema, you should be able to get a hardship payment depending on your circumstances. i finished my 4 week work placement 4 weeks ago and now work as a volunteer 3 days a week i enjoyed it that much but each to their own. while i was there i worked with a woman who was on a 13 week sanction and was getting hardship payments aprox £24 a week less than what she was getting before sanction. good luck with applying and really hope you get it as you cant live on nothing despite what our wonderfull givernment think. think i might be right in saying it will affect all benefits paid to you.

Edited by hatsanman
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the DWP and Jobcentres are simply not able to cope with all the requirements of jobseeking now. All very well dreaming up schemes they'd like us to do but they simply don't have the time or man-power to carry it all out..luckily for us, as most of their 'help' is worse than useless, as we've all found.

 

If they can only spare a few minutes every 2 weeks to see people when they sign on then they're really going to struggle if they try to increase everything; there's only so much they can actually check up on as it all takes time which they haven't got. Catch-22 in a way.

 

Maybe they should take on some more staff and create a few thousand jobs for us.

i did wonder if this was the case as my advisor is telling me now i dont need to apply for so many jobs. i told him i would still apply for so many if not more as its a joke. one minute they say apply and the next dont :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the letter from the job centre today telling me I have been sanctioned for not doing the mandatory work activity at the charity shop

 

It says my money has stopped for 13 weeks from the 28th nov to 26th feb

 

Does anyone know if I will be able to get hardship and how long will it take to get a payment, also will my housing benefit be affected

 

Write again appealing against the decision - If you had been the one giving the verbal abuse, you'd have had a sanction for "gross misconduct". As you were on the receiving end, it is unfair that you should have to suffer the consequences in my opinion. We are all entitled to be treated with dignity and respect regardless of circumstance.

 

As for housing benefit, contact your local council first thing Monday and fill out a nil income declaration. The council may also be able to refer you to other organisations that can offer support and advice.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here,s one for all you computer boffins, can the jobcentre (IF) you sign up to uj jobsite and (IF) you grant them permission to look at your account can they trace any other sites you vist while you are online? i here so many things about cookies yes they can trace evry site you visit no they cant so any advice id be gratefull for. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although not advised, you can always untick the box giving them permission.

 

Why not advised? The choice of whether you give the Jobcentre access to your UJ account is entirely yours. And, if you have any sense, you wouldn't tick it in the first place or if you did then untick it immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...