Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

camerons latest missive


debt4get
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the real reason for this 'announcement' was to get the press off the 'tax breaks' so enjoyed by the more wealthier people in this country...it as getting to close to home for comfort....so come out with this scheme...it detracts us proles and gets us thinking about something else....also the coming strike by hmrc staff as their jobs have been cut..resulting in less tax being able to be collected from these so-called schemes....gissa job dave...i promise to hound these tax evaders to the grave if neccessary...i will leave no stone unturned until i can collect for you every penny they owe..go on dave gissa job?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i really think we should put forward to this govt...that all people receiving unemployment benefit should be made to work at hmrc and help with collecting all the billions of unpaid taxes that are fiddled every year...now that is the way to get the unemployed working for their money...and much more cost effective than litter picking....its a win win situation davie boy!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the best one yet from camerons speech today

Sickness benefit claimants should take steps to improve their health.....

get off your sickbed and prepare for work!!!you lazy good for nothing sick person you....you ought to be ashamed of yourself allowing honest hard working tax paying public to pay for your unfullfilling parasitic lifestyle....excuse me whilst i go and pu&e....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify my comment about coming from an affluent family wasnt aimed at anyone, it was a general comment about some people who have it in for people who have been born into a different and more affluent lifestyle.

get a little tired of hearing comments about people being born with silver spoons in their mouths, there will always be those that have more, have an easier life or better job than others, everyone cannot be the same, if we all had the same there would be nothing for anyone who wants to, to aspire to.

I have no idea or opinion on anyone on heres life, status etc and would not presume to make assumptions.

Hope thats cleared up any misunderstanding. :-)

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sickness benefit claimants should take steps to improve their health.....

 

I have just laughed:

 

By sending sick people constant ESA50 forms, sending them for assessments and putting them through the appeals process, is just making them worse and delaying a return to work.

 

Was it ever this bad under IB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the best one yet from camerons speech today

Sickness benefit claimants should take steps to improve their health.....

get off your sickbed and prepare for work!!!you lazy good for nothing sick person you....you ought to be ashamed of yourself allowing honest hard working tax paying public to pay for your unfullfilling parasitic lifestyle....excuse me whilst i go and pu&e....

 

maybe he has found out about a miracle cure for for ALL debilitating illnesses like MS and cancer, heart problems, kidney problems etc. He should spend a day as a disabled person and find how hard it is to try and improve our health.

Most of us cannot afford to improve our health because many of the treatments that can help are either banned in this country or are not on the NHS or we are not in the right area to get them.

Its pretty hard to buy the fresh produce in this country to get healthy because it is so expensive and the reason why it is so expensive is because too many cooperatives buy produce out side of this country because its cheaper, so not healthy because it has additives added to keep it fresher longer, which isnt a healthy option and can cause many of the ailments that cause people to be sick in the first place.

So English produce IS expensive and the fresher it is the more its costs because the farmers cannot compete with out side countries, If cooperates started buying in this country the prices would go down.

 

I could go on but I would lose myself in the self loathing of being so ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get a little tired of hearing comments about people being born with silver spoons in their mouths, there will always be those that have more, have an easier life or better job than others, everyone cannot be the same, if we all had the same there would be nothing for anyone who wants to, to aspire to.
Just to bring this into some kind of perspective. Six years ago I worked for the Duke of Westminster's Grosvenor Estates, I was part of a team that maintained his properties in Mayfair and Belgravia.

 

I did quite a lot of work in Eaton Square which is arguably the most desirable address in London, I saw first hand just what real wealth means in real terms, not figures on a piece of paper and I can tell you that most of the people living in these luxurious surroundings have not the faintest concept of what life is like for 'ordinary' people, loose change to them would feed a needy family for months from Fortnum and Mason.

 

These are people that not only have no worries for themselves for the rest of their lives also their children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren ad infinitum can look forward to the same lifestyle, some of those people are the very ones that are involved in making the decisions that rule our lives, it's not so much jealousy, or sour grapes that made me resent those people, it was the sheer indifference they show to others less fortunate, we don't exist, and if we do we should be seen and not heard, and how dare we ask for a fair crack of the whip, we are there to serve and be quiet about it.

 

So yes I resent wealth and privilege, not only because it sets people apart, but because it's used as the means to subjugate others, it instills a belief that those who are privileged are superior both morally and intellectually, born to lead so we may follow.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So yes I resent wealth and privilege, not only because it sets people apart, but because it's used as the means to subjugate others, it instills a belief that those who are privileged are superior both morally and intellectually, born to lead so we may follow.

 

May I make a slight edit to the end of that, to "born to rule and we must obey"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest amianne
I can imagine that Cameron has just lost votes from the 18 to 25's now, so thats the disabled, the elderly, and the unemployed. I cant imagine he will be voted back in in the next election.

 

 

Let's be honest does it really matter?

 

The 18 to 25's, the disabled, the elderly, and the unemployed would never vote Conservative!

 

But what he is doing is to improve his ratings with those that would! Simple politics. No point in trying to win over your opponents with arguments that they will never accept, much better to bring together those that you know will be with you and along the way make the opponents look like idiots.

 

Who wants to agree with an idiot?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest amianne

 

So yes I resent wealth and privilege, not only because it sets people apart, but because it's used as the means to subjugate others, it instills a belief that those who are privileged are superior both morally and intellectually, born to lead so we may follow.

 

There is nothing new about that. You only have to look back over the past 1000 years to see that that is and will always be the way.

 

The master of the 'big house' was always accepted as being superior. He was the one who became a judge, an MP.

Those under him paid him a rent so that they could have a bit of land in order that they could produce food to feed their family.

 

The coal miners and steel workers of the 17th & 18 th centuries who were paid tokens for their toil only to find that they could only exchange them for food in shops owned by their employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But what he is doing is to improve his ratings with those that would! Simple politics. No point in trying to win over your opponents with arguments that they will never accept, much better to bring together those that you know will be with you and along the way make the opponents look like idiots.

 

 

I disagree that there is "no point" in trying to win over your opponents with arguments. In fact, my contention is that the entire point of politics is to win over your opponents with arguments. As to whether or not those people will accept your arguments? How could you possibly know that until you actually make them?

 

The main reason Cameron is playing a dangerous game here is not that there's a whole bunch of under 25s and disabled people who would have voted for him who will now vote against him. It's that there's a lot of under 25s and disabled people who may now vote against him who previously wouldn't have voted at all.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be honest does it really matter?

 

The 18 to 25's, the disabled, the elderly, and the unemployed would never vote Conservative! ...

 

You think? When I was 18 to 25 I voted Conservative. When I was unemployed I voted Conservative. When I first became disabled I voted Conservative. I haven't got to the elderly bit yet mind.

 

With their muddled thinking and knee-jerk reactions they have lost my vote. Yes, really, a life long Conservative very peed off with the Tories. And guess what? I'm not the only one ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

i really think we should put forward to this govt...that all people receiving unemployment benefit should be made to work at hmrc and help with collecting all the billions of unpaid taxes that are fiddled every year...now that is the way to get the unemployed working for their money...and much more cost effective than litter picking....its a win win situation davie boy!!!!

 

D4get, you're normally right on the money, but don't think Cameron and his mates would like their missing unpaid tax collected/or legal avoidance schemes nailed down..

 

And if he decided to take up your suggestion looking for the odd missing million ,not the corporate companies or billionaires, he'd no doubt award a nice fat private contract to one of his many wealthy mates. Who can then create more of these part time short term NMW jobs (adding to burgeoning Tax Credits needed for families to meet basic living costs) or indeed use the new forced unpaid labour from his new Back to ~Work scheme.

 

Meanwhile his mate the CEO can rips the a**e out of the public purse yet again, before moving on to the next lucrative outsoucing contract Cameron can think up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The NMW is paid in the multi-national retail stores, but they do not even want to pay people the NMW if they could get away with it. Staff working in the very large retailers end up working for nothing to keep their jobs, this is Cameron and his millionaire’s cabinet world. You know, in these so called supposed to be good employer supermarkets they make search on their staff throughout the day to see if they are stealing from the store, staff have to take of their shoes to see if they have gotten anything hidden in their shoes. How demeaning is that for you. CCTV on staff continuously is not enough they get manager to search staff throughout their day. I was appalled when that happened to me I thought I was in prison. Some employees have been asked to pull-up their top for inspections. On the employment thread this has been posts on the about kind of abuse to staff on NMW.

Edited by bonnygirl
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing new about that. You only have to look back over the past 1000 years to see that that is and will always be the way.
Where did I mention new in my post? And to presuppose that this will always be the status quo shows a blithe acceptance of one persons superiority based on wealth and tradition.

 

The Grosvenor's of this world received their lands and wealth as reward for assisting William I on the 14th Oct 1066, it's about time we took back what the Norman usurpers stole from us in the first place, the only difference between Grosvenor's ancestors and mine is that he was Norman had a bigger army and got to the goodies first.

 

On a more serious note, I for one hugely resent being 'ruled' by a German (The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) whose family decided to change their name to Windsor to be more 'English', the French had the best idea, off with their heads!

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a more serious note, I for one hugely resent being 'ruled' by a German (The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) whose family decided to change their name to Windsor to be more 'English', the French had the best idea, off with their heads!

 

:lol:

 

our queen is a goth??!!

how cool is that

gothsavethequeen.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

We dont know if the person you are referring to is from an affluent family as this particilar poster has a father who is in receipt of DLA, a mother who refuses to see a doctor but would like to receive Attendance Allowance and the poster who is in receipt of benefits.

 

I dont think it matters what class someone comes from, if they are entitled to benefits they are entitled and should therefore claim them.

 

With regards to David Cameron, he will be kicked out of office long before this nonsense he is suggesting gets anywhere.

 

JB

 

I most certainly agree with the final statement, it is for this reason that tories rush through such policy without looking at the long term implications. In making this statement I should add that I have been fortunate in as much as I have never needed to claim benefit and to SOME EXTENT agree that reform is needed. However, there needs to be a balance between what is fair and reasonable and a policy that will merely create poverty. I am not sure that tories have the capabilty of striking such a balance. There again I may be slightly biased as I am Scottish and we DON'T DO TORIES.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well It's started. :(

 

Outrage and shock after man sets himself on fire outside Birmingham job centre

 

http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2012/06/29/reaction-outrage-and-shock-after-man-sets-himself-on-fire-outside-birmingham-job-centre-97319-31288482/

 

How many more people will be driven to such desperate measures?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...