Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
    • Firstly, thank you for filling in the sticky so quickly - we wish everyone who comes here would do that! You're in the clear.  MET don't know who the driver was.  They can use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the keeper if their bilge arrives within 14 days - they didn't send it out till 102 days after!!! So sit on your hands.  MET will come out with threat after threat but ultimately will do nothing. Have a read of other threads for this car park - we are having a tsunami of cases at the moment. Be sure to come back here though if they ever send you a Letter of Claim.  
    • Just received this letter from Lowell.  IMG_1032.pdf
    • I don't think you are misunderstanding. It seems something may have gone missing. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

They will make her bankrupt for 4000 pounds, help please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It only adds to my Knowledge, so am quite grateful DCA's take the time to bluff and request help as I am learning all the time, so cheers your efforts only enhance that of CAG.:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can waste our time, I'm sure we can waste theirs. Here's a suggestion :-

 

What about calling them to pay off substantial debts (how much commission do Lowell monkeys get from a £15'000 debt?)? Then, we 'forget' or 'cartoon-ify' vital information, like names, dates of birth, postcodes, etc, spanning the call out for as long as possible.

 

Most important points are never to give away any real information and make sure you can do this for free - Lowell are certainly worth having their time wasted, but not at any extra cost (not even a penny!) to a CAG member.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite often do this anyway, the last one breached the DPA on no fewer than 4 occasions!

 

And when I'm really drunk, I'll often leave inaudable ramblings on on their answer phones....:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then, a salutory lesson for a Novice like me.

Well spotted early on "LTWFB" pity nobody could smell.

Just a shame for all the valuable time and effort you guys have put in, just teaches us a lesson to be economical with our own details and proves Cerbs point "Not everyone on here is a genuine cagger"

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a shame for all the valuable time and effort you guys have put in

 

It's not really though, as the others have said, it all helps to hone our collective knowledge. And I suspect that any future Lowells victims who google and find this thread would be more likely to be emboldened to fight rather than to pay up. So CAG has been the winner in this little exercise, at least that's the way I see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes H&P your right, also help to hone our noses to future scams.

What a chuckle - and the clue was in the name all the time,lol

Edited by boswell
typo-again!!

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really irritating when something like this happens but that, of course, is the point (assuming the troll isn't just an idiot). It's intended to put people off helping. It actually has the opposite effect on me. It simply refreshes my utter contempt for the debt collection industry and my wish to see them compelled to behave properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that despite being asked several times beaCONsMAN never actually produced a copy of what was supposedly sent to him by the LEEDS LOSERS.

 

Still instead of showing people that its wrong to tackle this **** as was probably his intention he has apparently done the opposite by showing the lengths DCAs will go to to discredit CAG.

 

Thanks a lot beaCONsMAN

Link to post
Share on other sites

This idiot may have had the motive of posting on the forum to prove 'there is evidence of an SD turning immediately into a charging order on a respected internet forum' Without the court details and the name of the judge this won't sit well with the powers that be.

 

Can I suggest that this thread be locked and blocked so it can't be accessed by anyone else... unless of course Beconsman himself shows up again.

 

I thought it was a bit on the suspect size as there was no posting of court details etc, which is usual on this type of case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- What this says to me, is that CAG members are proper human beings, prepared to give people the benefit of the doubt.

Which is way much better than DCA-life.

Good folk, CAGgers! :) xx

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubtless he & his playschool buddies are teeheeing in the classroom today at their little game.

 

This just goes to show the power of CAG that they feel it necessary to drum up such a scheme in order to try to refute the success of CAG.

 

They certainly live up to their reputation of being the Leeds Losers - so sad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a let down :mad:

 

And I have only been following this thread and not contributing!!

 

If a troll - how sad their lives must be. Nothing sad about trying to help people who you genuinely think need help.

 

Can't believe I didn't spot the conman name thing - I thought my gullible days were over.:)

 

Hopefully he will come back and prove everybody wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully he will come back and prove everybody wrong.

 

Hopefully he will find himself on the receiving end of his own threatogrammes and be in real need of debt advice, as they say, what goes around comes around, and I hope to be here when he falls on hard times and wants assistance.

 

Poor sad lonely boy.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

RIGHT, LETS GET ONE THING STRAIGHT, I CAME HERE FOR ADVICE AND AFTER SEEING SOME OF THE OTHER POSTS BY BAZOOKA WHO CLAIMS I WORK FOR LEEDS LOSERS, THIS IS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME, IT IS MY WIFES PROBLEM....I WORK IN THE EDCUATION SECTOR, ACTUALLY, IN PYHSICS....OK??

 

i am sorry, i get right peed off when people think i am takin the p""" I honeslty thought they wouldnt turn up on 29th dec, but they did...we had a 70 day period to get more evidence...now we are receiving more letters and they havent complied with the original cca...

 

my wife, oh she wants a voluntary charge and 50 quid a month, i have said, i want nothing more to do with it, she doesnt want the advice given on here and cannot convince her otherwise...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, Also, I Am NoW GOINGTo Get InTouch With The Moderators.......

 

WHY WE ARENT FIGHTING, SIMPLE. THE DJ SAID SHE HAD SEEN 25 CASES ON MONDAY 28TH AND TUESDAY 29, OUT OF ALL THOSE, ONLY 3 WERE SET ASIDE, HER ADVICE WAS TO NEGOTIATE...AS WE WOULD LOSE.....EVIDENCE AGAINST MY WIFE FAR TOO MUCH, SHE WANTED MORE EVIDENCE FROM US THAT WE COULD PROVE AN UNENFOREABLE DEBT...

 

AS SHE POINTED OUT, IF THEY HANDT HAVE TURNED UP THEN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE..SHE ADVISED US TO SETTLE..

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...