Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Inside a DCA!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi very informative!

My friend has only one debt to a credit dard in default, they have produced no CCA and has been along while so dont expect to see it.

If however he still offers to a full and final aslong as they remove default, are they likely to go for that?

 

If the DCA and creditor agree to the amount he is offering then they will mark the account with the CRAs as 'partially settled' and have a £0 balance on the account.

 

You would need to get his credit report (give it a couple of months to update) and just make sure the record is updated.

 

In truth, the DCA will just notify the CRA of the settled account and it is possible the default will remain. Ensure you add in the F&F letter the condition of default removal. But I'm not sure if default will actually be removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

onthebrink-what do you make of this one?

 

Marlin have been hounding me for an"alleged debt" since the end of last year.I wrote asking them to prove what I allegedly owed,as I hadn't a clue who they were....

 

They first asked for a specimen of my signature(ahem)

 

Request ignored....

 

They then issued a court threatogram,which was rebuffed by an equally,if not more effective threatogram from this end......

 

They are now nicely asking for a driver's licence,passport or something else which will officially confirm my signature and date of birth,because-wait for it-

 

 

"if they sent me a copy of the CCA and I wasn't actually the person they were in the belief was their customer they would be breaching the Data Protection Act...."

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you are a DCA staff member you are required to collect as much money as possible. On the wall of the office was an tv screen that detailed the recovered amount per 'client' (Halifax) for the proceeding day. It was the first thing that the staff checked when they arrived at 8am.

 

Debts over 2 years old.

Debts in dispute.

recommend CCJ.

 

 

I have a few questions:

 

1. What triggers the decision to go for a CCJ?

* particularly, how likely is court action against someone on benefits, with no equity?

* how likely is court action against someone where the debt is years old.

* Who makes the decision to continue litigation if the action is defended?

* Even if the DCA formally buys the debt, is it still the OC who decides if court action will start?

 

2. what effect does the time of month have, in terms of accepting settlements. i've heared people are more willing to offer settlements near the end of the week, month, and especially financial year.

 

3. in terms of higher management, is the role of an account manager actually considered akin to a salesperson.

 

4. What were the most effective tactics used by a debtor against your firm by particular rogue debtors.

 

5. How did your firm react to people getting the debt charities involved, or raising formal complaints with the OFT etc.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

onthebrink-what do you make of this one?

 

Marlin have been hounding me for an"alleged debt" since the end of last year.I wrote asking them to prove what I allegedly owed,as I hadn't a clue who they were....

 

They first asked for a specimen of my signature(ahem)

 

Request ignored....

 

They then issued a court threatogram,which was rebuffed by an equally,if not more effective threatogram from this end......

 

They are now nicely asking for a driver's licence,passport or something else which will officially confirm my signature and date of birth,because-wait for it-

 

 

"if they sent me a copy of the CCA and I wasn't actually the person they were in the belief was their customer they would be breaching the Data Protection Act...."

 

:D LOL :D

 

Don't ya just love um.

 

I would point out that it is they that need to justify the debt is owed, the onus of responsibility is firmly in their court.

I would also point out that they have a legal responsibility to provide the information requested under a CCA request.

I would add that you are not refusing their request for the information and would be happy to comply to any county court in England.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a few questions:

 

1. What triggers the decision to go for a CCJ?

a) if all other options of recovery are exhausted

b) if the creditor would obtain an increased likelyhood of recovery

c) if you have positive equity in you home to allow for a charging order

d) you are in full time employment - to allow an attachment of earnings

e) no response to efforts of recovery

f) refusal to pay

 

* particularly, how likely is court action against someone on benefits, with no equity?

limited but not impossible, it would depend of the total debts owed to all creditors.

 

* how likely is court action against someone where the debt is years old.

Depends on how old, if they have been paying small amounts, if the debtor was traced to a new address, etc.

* Who makes the decision to continue litigation if the action is defended?

The creditor on the advice of their solicitors.

 

* Even if the DCA formally buys the debt, is it still the OC who decides if court action will start?

No. If the OC has sold the debt then the DCA will determine recovery action. Please be aware some purchase contracts stipulate that their will be 'joint liability' for the recovery of the debt. In these cases the DCA has 'purchased' the debt at a reduced rate (say 7p in the £) but must still obtain permission from the OC to go to court.

 

2. what effect does the time of month have, in terms of accepting settlements. i've heared people are more willing to offer settlements near the end of the week, month, and especially financial year.

F&F settlements are determined on a number of set criteria and end of financial year settlements are not uncommon (you would however, need to find out when there end of year falls (March/Dec) and also take into account that all business have a 'close down' period that can fall into the new finance year). Week or month end settlements have less impact.

 

3. in terms of higher management, is the role of an account manager actually considered akin to a salesperson.

Yes. they are the workhorses of the DCA and are call 'account managers' to give the perception to debtors they are important, but the reality is they are likely to be in their late teens early tweenties and are their to turn over the debtor accounts as quickly as possible.

 

 

4. What were the most effective tactics used by a debtor against your firm by particular rogue debtors.

I'll return to 'strategies' later in the week. ;)

 

5. How did your firm react to people getting the debt charities involved, or raising formal complaints with the OFT etc.

Charities are unpopular with DCAs because they know the debtors 'rights' and used that knowledge appropriately. The CAB are seen as an inconvience because they are seen to hamper the process rather than help, and to be honest, a bad debt advisor from the CAB could give away far more infomation than was required, often not helping the debtor at all.

Complaints to the OFT were often shrugged off by the DCAs, we would get at least one a week and they would result in a 'you must do better' request. But the DCA would not change a thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi onthebrink can you tell me why a dca can put a default on a credit file 12months before a debt is assigned over from the oc, im puzzled

 

In MOST cases it is not the DCA that registers the default with the CRAs, it is the OC. If the DCA is an in house DCA, then they will register the default, but they are only a DCA in name and actually are often staffed by OC staff.

 

A default notice is normally registered with the CRAs 90 days after the last contracted payment is received. From that point on the OC can assign the debt to a DCA.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add my thanks onthebrink...

 

Thanks for a very informative and well presented thread. :)

 

Regards & best wishes, Dave.

 

Thank you.

 

 

Just to answer a PM question (please guys/girls don't be shy, put your questions in the thread - I don't bite).

 

Should I talk to the DCA when they call?

 

Not every call NO. Once you have notified the DCA of your financial status and offer of payment and followed this up with a letter then responding is your decision. You should only tell them as much as they need to know in order to determine if they will accept a payment plan.

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

blue - you need to keep that to your own thread and seek help away from this one, otherwise we will end up cluttered with random questions.

 

If you need help starting one, let me know.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Onthebrink

 

A fantastic thread, very very informative. I have some qustions for you if you don't mind?

 

1) what's your advise on Bank overdraft debts that are years old? I know they are apparently not covered by CCA but some OC DCA think they are and respond in similar fashion as like credit cards.

 

2) what's the best way to get rid of DCA /OC etc who have been trying for years and years?

 

3)I had a CCJ years ago that has disappeared (only just realized after obtaining my Credit file). I have been paying Brachers Solicitors £10/month every month since judgment (shame I didn't come across this site then eh?)

The problem is I can not fir the life of me remember how much this was and wether i have actually paid it off and am still paying unnecessarry?? Have written to Brachers many many time but they just don't reply. If I still owe them from initail judgement what can they do if i stop paying? can they default me? and will me CCJ ome back again?

 

Thanks again for your help, I know ur v busy today with all replies etc..

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

lease be aware some purchase contracts stipulate that their will be 'joint liability' for the recovery of the debt. In these cases the DCA has 'purchased' the debt at a reduced rate (say 7p in the £) but must still obtain permission from the OC to go to court.

 

These will be simple assignments, then. This may well help to explain the 'rights but not duties' mantra trotted out by so many low-end DCAs. We know that in many cases it's simply bolleaux, but it may be that in other cases that it's a simple assignment and we can go after the OC as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your question.

 

The honest answer is that it is most likely that the DCA have received assurance from the OC that there is no foundation to the dispute. Any paperwork you subsequently sent them will be noted but passed to the OC.

It is likely (although I do not know for sure) that the OC refused to accept liability for the orginal error and thus asserts the debts is owed.

 

The DCA would continue to pursue the 'debt' on the basis that the assurance they have from the OC overrides your arguement (no matter how legally sound it was). This often continues untill either it is recalled by the OC or the debtor takes legal action (as in your case). The account is then passed back to the OC and more often than not just sent to another DCA.

 

This ping pong game is sadely common within the industry and to be honest, the fault sits with the OC, and any action should be forcefully pursued with them.

 

All DCA will 'process' the debt until such a time when it becomes 'to hot to handle' the they wash then hands of it and pass it back to the OC.

 

On the subject of 'lost paperwork' I am sorry to say this is another common practice. Often, the DCA account manager will read the letter and if that information is already on the file they will just shread you paperwork. When you call to say 'oi, I sent you paperwork' the account manager will not remember and try to confirm a date you sent it. they will then look on the system and see nothing registered around that date. They then state 'nothing was received', which can be bloody frustrating.

But the fact is DCA have a practice of not duplicating information, but as a minimum the account manager should note ' letter received same as note 4 above, etc.' But they don't most of the time.

 

Hi and thanks for the reply.

 

What concerns me about this matter is that the OC and DCA have all signed for the paperwork and have all had the evidence regarding this as in bank statements and official letters from our bank and the OCs bank to say that the money was paid and the money was recieved.

 

How can they just ignore the evidence and how can they just ignore letters that were sent especially when they are signing for them as the debitor will have proof the letter was signed for?

 

Also how can the OC refuse to accept any liability for the missing payments with the large amount of evidence and even there own bank saying the money is there?

 

Thanks for being so understand with us and for answering all our question BTW as you will understand some of us are having quite a few problems with DCAs.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Onthebrink,

It's good to meet you. Can you tell me please if it's legitimate for an OC to issue default notices when no actual payments have been missed? The default notices never arrived either but the accounts were passed on to DCAs after that and the hounding began.

Thanks for a brilliant thread which is answering lots of questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question regarding a different DCA/OC.

 

I am just going to give you a bit of backround before i ask the question as this may help u.

Now the DCA is the in house for the OC they are operating under a different name but it is pretty obvious they are the same company when you look at the paperwork and when you look on line.

 

I had 2 different accounts with a company under there sub companys.

Now i queried the account with CCA requests and they passed the accounts to there in house DCAs.

 

I requeried the CCAs and got back nothing that was a CCA just a couple of statements and the other account i got back a blank CCA asking that i fill it in and send it back.

 

Sent them a non compliance letter and then after about 6 weeks they wrote to me saying they accepted the CCA was unenforcable and dropped the account and sent it back to the OC who then cleared the balance.

 

A couple of days before the letter telling me the DCA has dropped the file and the OC had cleared the balance they registered a deafult on my credit referance file but the amount it settled and stands at zero. I have contacted the OC and they claim it was not them and the DCA claims it was not them. They have refused to remove the deafult. They have the deafult amount at zero not anything else.

 

How can either company say it was the other and how can they register the deafult as correct if the amount is zero and no body will admitt to puttin it there?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi onthebrink and thank you for sharing some invaluable information with us all :)

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will respond but just need you to confirm what CL is?

 

:-?

 

CL is C L Finance (a DCA) and their solicitors (HC) are Howard Cohen and Co.

 

They are particularly noted for buying a debt, banging in an immediate Claim to court (using incorrect - usually former - addresses for Defendants) and then selling the debt with a shiny new CCJ attached to other DCAs at a profit. I have a name for companies like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good ,good info . I think its very clear there are a huge number of unenforceable accounts. If you have any doubts you must fight back against the tactics used by the DCA,S . The info provided shows that phoning these companies must be avoided and contact should be by letter only . This thread make me more focused on dealing with them .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...