Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Wilkin Chapman - PAPLOC - old Capital on Tap Business Debt with PG


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

COT have defaulted our LTD Co. debt.

LTD still trading and just about surviving

now I believe it is being pursued under PG,  therefore a personal debt.

COT initially offered arrangement and then terminated the agreement despite meeting the first 2 payments.

The balance Lowell/Wilkin Chapman are quoting isn't even correct (it's at least £800 more than it should be).

Is this enforceable debt if it's left untreated? ~£9k

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/Wilkin Chapman - old Capital on Tap Business Debt with PG

well known here

follow the advice in the existing threads

Programmable Search Engine (google.com)

clickme^^^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've actually read these threads already when I was Googling last night.

Still unsure what to do here. I am on a DMP with PayPlan already for personal debts (around £44k).

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR time to COT.

as for a DMP why? do it yourself after CCA request to everyone you are currently blindly paying.

are any of these debt historic and being paid to debt collectors?

might be an idea to start a new thread in the debt self help forum about the DMP and your debts.

if also you read a good few threads there it could save you £1000's

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Requesting a SAR from COT - don’t see how it benefits me?

Can’t I just ignore Lowell altogether?

They haven’t even got the debt amount correct like I said the other day - what should I do with that?

They're like £700 out

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowells have bought the debt for penuts...

and anyway...you are ignoring lowells

the sar goes to COT whom have sold the debt now

you never know what stokes lowells are gonna pull or what docs they may fake up..should they say ever try a letter of claim

but having a complete set of everything from COT puts you one step ahead of lowells and their dodgy tactics on every debt they own

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a problem here - just realised COT had my mum's address from 2020 (when I lived there).

Lowell/Wilkin issued letters last week which arrived today.

Should I contact them to get the address changed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should never be moving without informing all your creditors (or debt owners) in writing of your move.

the sar will update COT, but read all the thread as there is one more thing you need to include withit

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't be tipping them off no.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NB Lowell's MO is to actively seek debtors who have moved without informing them, it's so easy for them to get an undefended judgement, meaning that you will get a visit from the Bailiffs at some point in the future. 

On the converse side, if you keep them informed of your address changes, then you will be able to receive all their rubbish and if you ever receive a pre action protocol letter from them you will learn how simple it is to bat Lowell off.

Send them your updated details and sleep easy, if anything should come through of consequence come back to this thread for help

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean a letter of claim with a reply pack wanting I&E etc?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"As the company has failed to make payment our client seeks to rely on the guarantee and we are instructed to advise you that unless we receive payment of the outstanding debt within 30 days of the date of this letter we are instructed to consider issuing court proceedings against you and the company without further notice. Court proceedings will also include a claim for court fees, solicitor’s costs and interest."

 

How long do I have to fill in the Reply Form?

You only have 30 days from the date at the top of the letter from the business to send back the Reply Form. If the business does not get your Reply Form within 30 days, it could take you to court in relation to the debt. Make sure you allow time for posting.

If a court orders you to pay an amount of money (called “having judgment entered against you”), details of the judgment will usually be entered on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines. Most entries stay on the Register for six years unless you pay the amount you owe within one month of the judgment.

Organisations such as banks, building societies and credit companies use the information on the Register when someone applies for credit, such as a loan or overdraft. It helps them decide whether or not that person would be able to pay off a debt.

 

What happens if I fill in and return the Reply Form in time?

If you return the Reply Form within 30 days, you and the business will have at least a further 30 days to discuss the debt, or for you to seek debt advice, before the business takes you to court. During that time you should discuss with the business how you can resolve the matter, ideally without going to court.

If you request more information in the Reply Form, the business must wait at least 30 days after it gives you that information before taking you to court. 

 

Where can I find out more?

This Information Sheet is a summary of your rights and responsibilities under the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims. Where a business and an individual disagree about a debt claim, the Protocol tells them what they should do before they go to court. If you want to know more, the full Protocol is available at: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/protocol.

 

 

 

 

REPLY FORM

YOU HAVE 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE AT THE TOP OF THE ENCLOSED LETTER TO FILL IN AND RETURN THIS FORM.

IF YOU DON’T, IT COULD RESULT IN COURT PROCEEDINGS.

 

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the debt, please call the business that sent you this form as soon as possible.

 

Full name:

Address and postcode:

Contact telephone numbers:

Email address:

Reference:

 

BOX A

I agree I owe the debt.

Tick this box if you agree you owe the debt and agree the amount of the debt is correct.

IF YOU WILL PAY THE DEBT, GO TO SECTION 2.

IF YOU NEED DEBT OR LEGAL ADVICE, GO TO SECTION 3.

o   BOX B

I owe some of the debt, but not all of it.

Tick this box if you agree you owe some of the debt, but not all of it, for example if you think too much interest has been added or you haven’t been credited for payments you made in the past. 

The amount of debt I owe to you is £…………. .

Say how much you think you owe.

I don’t owe any more than this because ……………

Explain on a separate piece of paper why you don’t owe all of the debt. Give as much detail as possible and provide copies of any supporting documents.

IF YOU WILL PAY THE PART OF THE DEBT YOU OWE, GO TO SECTION 2.

IF YOU NEED DEBT OR LEGAL ADVICE, GO TO SECTION 3.

OTHERWISE, GO TO SECTION 4.

o   BOX C

I don’t know whether I owe the debt.

Tick this box if you’re not sure whether you owe the debt and/or you need help from a debt adviser to work out whether you should pay.

NOW GO TO SECTION 3.

o   BOX D

I dispute the debt.

Tick this box if you don’t owe the debt, for example because the debt should be paid by someone else, because you have already paid it, or because there is a legal problem with the credit agreement.

I dispute the debt because ……………

Explain on a separate piece of paper why you dispute the debt. Give as much detail as possible and provide copies of any supporting documents.

NOW GO TO SECTION 4.

 

SECTION 2: How will you pay?

Only complete this section if you ticked Box A or Box B in Section 1 and you want to pay now.

 

The letter from the business will tell you how to pay. Keep a record of the payments you make.

 

o   BOX E

I will pay what I owe now.

Tick this box if you agree that you owe all or part of the debt and you are able to pay what you owe now. You should pay using the payment details in the letter from the business. Keep a copy of any proof of payment you receive.

o   BOX F

I will pay, but I need time to pay.

Tick this box if you agree that you owe all or part of the debt, but you can’t pay right now.

If you offer to make repayments, you must be able to afford them. You should consider getting debt advice about how much you can afford to repay. If you are seeking debt advice, complete Section 3.

My proposals for repayment are ………….. .

Explain on a separate piece of paper how you intend to pay the debt. Say how much you could pay now and how you will pay the remainder. For example, say how much you could pay each week, fortnight or month and when your first payment would be made.

I have provided a Financial Statement showing my current financial situation:

Yes   o                  No     o  

To help the business ensure you can afford your proposed repayments, fill out the Financial Statement that is attached to this form. You should also attach a copy of any budget or financial statement that a debt advice organisation has helped you prepare.

 

SECTION 3: Do you intend to get, or are you already getting, debt advice?

Only complete this section if you are getting debt advice about whether you owe the debt or whether you can afford to pay.

 

o   BOX G

I am getting or intend to get debt advice.

I am getting advice from ………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………

Insert the name and contact details of the person or organisation giving you advice.

I am getting advice about ………………

Explain on a separate piece of paper what you are getting advice about, for example whether you owe the debt or how you could pay.

I have an appointment with an adviser on ………….…………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………..If you have an appointment with a debt adviser, give the appointment date and time.

I can’t obtain advice within 30 days of returning this Reply Form because ……… .

If it will take you longer than 30 days to get debt advice, explain on a separate piece of paper the reason for the delay and when you expect advice will be available.

NOW COMPLETE SECTION 4.

 

SECTION 4: What documents are you sending with this form? What information do you need?

Complete the boxes below if you want to provide or get more information.

 

 

o   BOX H

I have provided documents.

Tick this box if you want to provide documents about the debt, for example you might want to provide a letter showing you have an appointment for debt advice or a receipt showing you paid some of the debt.

I have enclosed the following documents ……….. .

Describe on a separate piece of paper the documents you have provided and why they are important.

o   BOX I

I need more documents or information.

Tick this box if you need more information, such as copies of documents you don’t currently have.

I need a copy of ……………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………………………

Additional documents or information that you might need could include:

·         A copy of the written contract for the debt

·         A full statement of account, including details of all interest and charges included on the outstanding balance of the debt, explaining how they have been calculated, and any payments already made toward the debt

·         A calculation of the interest claimed

·         The annual or daily rate of interest

·         A description of the nature and amount of any administrative charges included in the debt

·         A copy of the notice of assignment of the debt

It's been a week and I've already has LOC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

wasted you time typing that all out.

hit letter of claim. follow post 4

thread title updated

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/Wilkin Chapman - PAPLOC - old Capital on Tap Business Debt with PG

The PAPDC does not apply to business to business debt only if the debtor is a sole trader.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so why are they sending it?

interesting.

not trying to scare people into paying up are they......😎

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You signed a PG and they have a copy of it ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very much doubt that...but did you sign one ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay hence they refer to it in their letter...still be interesting if they can disclose a copy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...