Jump to content

244065013

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    81
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About 244065013

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes the claimant won. So do you think there is a case for appeal?
  2. Sorry if I was unclear in what I wrote. To clarify, I mentioned the above and about the reconstructed agreement with varied terms etc but the judge said claimants (my case) recon agreement was acceptable even without signature etc and accepted Hoist's claim, So I guess it's the end of the road for my case, is there anything else I can do e.g. appeal or is that it. Thanks again.
  3. Unfortunately the judge allowed the appeal and accepted the recon and varied terms. Thanks for all the help.
  4. At the hearing, judge asking why a recon with varied cant be used, any ideas?
  5. Hi, I have my hearing tomorrow and haven't received any instructions on how to join the Skype call. Have emailed my details across last week. Have been trying call the court but no luck so far. Has anyone been in this situation before? Any suggestions? Secondly, any points/tips for the hearing would be appreceated. Many Thanks
  6. Hello, Just a quick update. WS sent through last week. Received a short letter from Cohen as below, dated yesterday (Typed out as). Not sure if this has any affect but thought I'd share. We refer to the above matter. For the avoidance of doubt, I will not be attending the above mentioned hearing as a witness in accordance with CPR 27.9(1)(a). There will however be an advocate in attendance on behalf of the claimant. The court has been notified of the same Signed "Howard Cohen & Co" Thanks
  7. Hi @Andyorch Do you think WS is ok to submit? Would appreciate any feedback. Many Thanks
  8. Hello All, So I have had an update from the court with details of a remote hearing scheduled for 26/8/20 (attached). There are a couple of things I don't quite understand. It stated that "the claimant does by 3.00 pm on 29 July 2020 pay to the court the trial fee of £170.00 or file a properly completed application (i.e one which provides all the required information in the manner requested) for help with fees, then the claim will be struck out with effect from 29 July 2020 without further order and, unless the court orders otherwise, you will also be liable for the
  9. Many thanks. Will work on the witness statement and post back for feedback. Thanks T
  10. Hi All, I have had an existing case with Hoist since Last July and it was stayed until 2/4/20 and to provide amended defence and claimant to provide new particulars, which was completed. I have now received a letter from the court (attached) with the option for mediation and to complete a witness statement. Previously, the mediation didn't go through as they hadn't supplied the "agreement". does that mean I should not go for mediation again and just provide the witness system? Am a bit confused. Any help would be appreciated.
  11. Hi All, I'm about to start drafting my amended defense as per court instructions (post #31) and wanted to ask what additional points I need to add to the original defence? The two obvious points being the CCA not provided in time and the one received is the T's & C's and says for internal use only from Barclaycard. I am also a little confused as reading through other posts it mentions "witness statement", is this on the allocation questionnaire? If some can point me in the right directions, it'll be much appreciated. Many Thanks T
×
×
  • Create New...