Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1042 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

With the EU MEP elections still being analysed and resulting in the UK ending up with MORE pro EU MEP's, after Farage only got 5 of the 15 'eurosceptic seats the torys lost 😁

 

We look to the claimed  Brexit stronghold of Peterborough election a week tomorrow for our next 'indicator'

 

The brexit party is touted as the favourite to win with at least some vocal  locals still  being reported as claiming that.

 

 

I suppose that depends on whether the other parties get their backsides in gear and run a Farage-esque campaign with Twitter and Facebook ads and simple messages even if those messages say little ... as long as they sound good.

In the Brexit heartlands, at least - they need to fight fire with fire.

 

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

These elections have changed nothing, everyone is just spinning it their way.

 

All contenders for PM are acting like somehow, they will be able to avoid the fate of Maggie Thatcher, John Major, David Cameron and Theresa May. All destroyed by their party over Europe.

Edited by London1971

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be interesting that Boris has been summoned to appear in court 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/29/boris-johnson-appear-court-eu-referendum-misconduct-claims

 

This might damage his chances of the leadership - who knows how it will change.

 

I think we are looking more and more likely to have a second referendum of some sort 

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could believe another referendum would make some worthwhile difference.  I can't find a leave voter who admits they voted that way because of the lies (even though they were very vocal about an extra £350m going straight to the NHS at the time in my local) so they're unlikely to change their minds and vote remain a second time around.  I even know remain voters who are so sick of the whole thing now they say they'd vote leave in a second referendum just to be done with it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So here;s corbyns stance:

 

He told reporters in Dublin that Labour would negotiate a new Brexit deal with the EU that would be put to the public, the Irish Times newspaper reported.

 

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-labour/corbyn-any-new-brexit-vote-will-not-be-leave-or-remain-re-run-idUKKCN1SZ2RI

 

" “The referendum would be on a negotiated deal or alternatives to that. It’s not a re-run of 2016,” Corbyn said."

 

So its Corbyns non-existent fantasy deal or no deal

 

Sound familiar?

 

 

 

Don't forget he';s already said any Labour deal that could get a majority in Parliament wouldn't be put to the people.

 

 

So much for a move away from demagogues and listening to the party and the people

- quite the opposite.

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem a hypocritical stance, doesn't it?  I do wonder if parties are avoiding a second referendum because they don't think they'll like the result.

 

There's an interesting article by Gordon Brown who seems to be turning into some sort of elder statesman. He thinks they've been discussing the wrong question and so do I. It isn't often I agree with GB. lol

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/30/new-battle-britain-resistance-nigel-farage

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, remain still haven't got their act together, I think a second referendum could go either way by the smallest of margins again.  I just don't think many minds have been changed in the last 3 years. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange thing is a number of the core issues he raises were stated - then quickly dumped

 

* We will negotiate the terms of a new deal before any legal leave process is started

* No one is talking about threatening our place in the single market

* Only fools would start a leave process before defining the terms ...

* A second referendum after the terms are agreed

* New trade deals across the world bigger than the EU ready to go a nanosecond after we trigger the leave process

* There is NO downside

* Easiest deal in history - we will get a great deal

 

Its what won the referendum at least as much as the 350m a week lie.

 

 

 

all that aside from Enoch Farages hate mongering.

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of Lying Boris, I actually think Boris is our best hope to actually stay in the EU.  All this hard Brexit stuff at the moment is just BS to please elderly Tory party members.

 

He's totally self absorbed, vain and has no moral compass, no way is he going to cause general election triggering national chaos by throwing us into a no deal.  The history books forever saying, Boris destroyed the economy, and only served as Pm for 6 months.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@London1971

 

You simply cant rely on a liar. Not even from one minute to the next.

 

 

@HB

 

When you think about it, every MP who voted to trigger article 50 before it was all sorted and presented back to the people - as presented

- betrayed all the voters in the referendum and the whole democratic process.

 

.. but of course, the alternative was to tell the truth

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those who believed the lies need to continue to do so.  It's no different to those individually targeted cons where the gullible continue to send ever increasing amounts of money to con artists. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The truth is fake news to them,

 

Not sure if any of you have been watching Chernobyl, sadly we've really not moved on much from then in some ways, misinformation wise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth a watch for those who haven't seen it.

 

Brexit: Endgame - The Hidden Money, with Stephen Fry

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It looks as if you do indeed need to be careful what you wish for. Unless there's a miracle, Boris is set to be PM by July.

 

The Guardian yesterday had excerpts from the European press and they're horrified given Boris's history with Brussels. One said he'll be a mini Trump over the Channel trying to wreck the EU.

 

Do we know what Boris actually believes in? One reason for his success seems to be telling Brexiteers and Remainers what they want to hear, but if he gets into power, he can't keep everyone happy.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Come Oct 31st Boris will be grovelling to the EU for an extension, just like his predecessor  I'm sure the PM was party to some pretty apcalyptic assessments of a no deal Brexit, and that was the reason she didn't simply let the deadline pass.

 

That's why changing PM is about as useful as changing captain on the Titanic after it hit the iceberg.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the Titanic reference. :D

 

The thought of a no deal exit is scary, as is the thought of a PM proroguing Parliament or just not presenting it with any legislation to debate, which some of the leadership hopefuls want to do.

 

And to get an extension, the EU have to agree, as you say. You just have to hope that if they're dealing with Boris, who they hate, they will be so worried about the effect of no deal  on their own economies that they'll agree to an extension.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 'project fear' becomes reality after a no deal there are so many questions.. but there is a massive risk of a general election if things go wrong, and it won't end well for the Tories.  I would think that Boris wouldn't want to go down in the history books as the shortest serving Prime Minister ever.

 

Or for that matter the PM directly responsible for paralysing the UK economy.

 

Also the other question, canceling parliament? to stop them making a decision, good luck with that, your going to need parliament on your side Mr PM. Remember your majority is as thin as a razor blade.

 

Edit, you have no majority

 

 

Edited by London1971

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm reading that Boris's leadership rivals have all signed up for the debate on Channel 4 on Sunday. He'll be represented by an empty chair if he doesn't turn up.

 

Boris's campaign seems to be on a news blackout, I assume because they're terrified the real Boris will show through. So far he's refused interviews and has taken six questions from journos. I didn't think he answered any of them yesterday.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, 

 

Which is part of the reason I don't think he will win, and he's peaked far too early IMO. 

 

 

Edited by London1971

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think honeybee13 has given you the reason why he WILL win.

 

It's inconceivable that he won't be one of the last 2 candidates, the final vote being made by the 160,000 odd conservative party members and his tax cut proposal to raise the higher rate threshold to £80k was precisely aimed to appeal to those 160,000 people.

 

Politically, at least, he knows exactly what he's doing.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe so, but he's hugely popular now, plenty of time to ruin things, and when you think about it he was an awful Foreign Secretary which on reflection doesn't bode well for the office of Prime Minister. Meanwhile, Jeremy Hunt quietly in the running.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

And to get an extension, the EU have to agree, as you say. You just have to hope that if they're dealing with Boris, who they hate, they will be so worried about the effect of no deal  on their own economies that they'll agree to an extension.

 

Personally I think the effect of Brexit on the EU (from their perspective) has been made out to be more convoluted than it is in reality.  People keep saying that they'll still buy and sell from us regardless.  And whilst I disagree with the blaise way in which people dismiss any negativity, the statement is true.  The EU will continue to trade with us, but the terms under which they trade will suffer - So as I see it, international firms will have a choice.  To keep investing in the UK and to keep paying more for products we export, or to go elsewhere.  To my mind it's a simple business choice.  If in fact we do make things more expensive to buy in, and harder to obtain through lack of any trade agreement or customs agreement then businesses would be stupid to purchase from us.  I think a lot of people are blind to the fact that whilst we have a manufacturing sector, we don't manufacture complete products here, and we don't have a lot of the raw materials within the UK.  Having no trade deals would just make it more expensive to import the goods we need to maintain our supply chain, whilst making it more expensive to export.

 

Quote

If 'project fear' becomes reality after a no deal there are so many questions.. but there is a massive risk of a general election if things go wrong, and it won't end well for the Tories.  I would think that Boris wouldn't want to go down in the history books as the shortest serving Prime Minister ever.

 

A general election won't happen.  The numbers don't exist within parliament to make it happen.  We would need the new PM To call one, and that would be suicide.

Edited by Jase1982
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jase1982 said:

 

 

 

 

A general election won't happen.  The numbers don't exist within parliament to make it happen.  We would need to new PM To call one, and that would be suicide.

 

C

 

So what exactly is a parliamentary no confidence vote? A motion of no confidence, or censure motion, is a motion moved in the House of Commons with the wording: “That this House has no confidence in HM Government”. It signifies that the government has lost the support of the Commons (the legislature), without which it is impossible to operate effectively. Retaining the confidence of the Commons is a core principle of the UK constitution.

The current rules are outlined in the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011. If a motion stating “That this House has no confidence in HM Government” is lost by the government and a new government with the support of a majority of MPs cannot be formed within 14 days, parliament is dissolved and an early general election is triggered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, and there aren't enough MP's within parliament to carry through a motion of no confidence.  We've seen it before.  Maybe if the Tories see a load more defectors to the independent party or whatever they want to call themselves.

 

It's uncharted territory, maybe if the new PM goes for a no deal scenario, but it would take a hell of a lot for any Tory to betray their party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1042 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...