
Consumer dude
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Content Count
3,272 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Consumer dude last won the day on November 18 2012
Consumer dude had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
342 ExcellentAbout Consumer dude
-
Rank
Gold Account Holder
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Consumer dude started following Council threat 1k fine for no information, Non refundable deposit., Basic Bank account- no credit check and 5 others
-
Even if the terms and conditions state that any deposit is non refundable, could this been challenged under unfair terms ?.
-
As the provider is a not for profit outfit, could only actual losses be claimed ?, A reasonable admin charge for instance so the £100. 00 deposit I paid could not legitimately be claimed as non refundable as I can't see that there was any losses, unfair terms perhaps ?.
-
-
No, cheque in post.
-
I had paid a deposit of £100 for therapy and was informed that they were a not for profit concern, so my immediate question would be, is it proportionate to keep all of the deposit for themselves as I was not able to attend the course as if any loss that they may have had was minimal, what is the law on this, many thanks.
-
What are the rules regarding non refundable deposits on a non profit service provider ?.
-
There is a registered charge by his bank on an official copy of register of title. If he has since paid off the Mortgage, would I legally need to be informed as I have an Equitable charge to my favour and would he need to inform the land registry of that ?.
-
Is their a way to find out if a mortgage is still being paid on the property.
-
Thousands and no end in sight.
-
Ok, thank you for that.
-
I am not disputing what you say. What is it you don't understand please ?.
-
I believe their will be. Is their any way of finding for sure what is left to pay on the mortgage ?.
-
Ok, So why do I need to sell a property that is not mine
-
Blimey, so in theory I could be given possession of the property and then evict the defendant without having to sell the said property ?.