Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could I have a link please.

 

Link ?

 

This is based on reading various including reports from House of Lords committees who have looked at these issues.

 

The government have just started to set up large numbers of civil servants across London to run through all of the complex issues that would need to be dealt with. From memory there is something like 38,000 pages of parliamentary bills, statutory instruments and then there are the industry specific agreements that have been issued over many years.

 

One expert who i can't remember his name predicted that it would take at least 7 years and probably over 10 years for any Brexit to be completed.

 

I still think Brexit is not certain and may well be subject to an election or another referendum, which might put a stop to it. Theresa May is right to pursue Brexit per the referendum result, but she knows it will be very difficult to achieve.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

uk explores 'free trade' with china. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36877573

 

ok, but that wld prob involve free movement of workers between. as it wld with any free trade agreement with any country/bloc! not forgetting continued usual immigration from countries outside of the eu thats not affected by eu exit. so much for the inherent immigration vote...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I voted the right choice and the choice that won (out) ie not to stay in the European Union.

 

The PM dose not have to use article 50 as it says we can use our own constitution to override any opposition to brexit.

 

The people have spoken let Democracy rule cus unionism is not in its own right democratic but bureaucratic.

 

And the queen can still dissolve parliament if she wishes and then we will be out of the EU as there is no elected members that can be an MEP

 

bankers4me

Link to post
Share on other sites

This matter as to any legality on implementing Article 50 with our own uncodified constitution is being put before the High Court in October. It is only right in my opinion Parliament has the final say being the supreme legislature, not the current rulling Executive. Anything else will be contrary to democracy and our own constitution

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I voted the right choice and the choice that won (out) ie not to stay in the European Union.

 

on what credible basis do you think that you made 'the right choice'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Democracy in Britain doesn’t mean majority rule. It’s not the tyranny of the majority or the tyranny of the mob … it’s the representatives of the people, not the people themselves, who vote for them.

 

Government of the people, by the people, for the people

 

The referendum was only advisory. It has not relevance to our own constitution or legislature. It was nothng but a giant opinion poll on the day. That is why Parliament must decide

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this needs to be left for legal and constitutional experts to deal with.

 

My take on it is that the UK does not have a written constutuition as such, but has a parliament that passes bills that make up the constituition. Part of the UK constituition will be all of the EU bills that have been passed by UK parliament since 1975, including the Lisbon treaty.

 

I believe article 50 was part of the Lisbon treaty and is the official way for the UK to leave the EU. Neither the Lisbon bill or the referendum bill confered any rights on any UK Prime Minister to use Royal Prorogative to trigger article 50. Therefore to trigger article 50 needs the consent of parliament in a bill, which would authorise the Prime Minister. If this was not the case, any Prime Minister could have at any time just triggered article 50 without any parliamentary vote or binding referendum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Government of the people, by the people, for the people

 

I whole heartily agree that guy was a good speaker you no. even no he was a labour pm

 

bankers4me

 

It happened to be the President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln who gave that speech at the Gettysburg Address. Not any British Labour politician

Link to post
Share on other sites

Membership of the EU or not will not make one iota of difference with personal banking in the UK

 

We all know what happens with Private banks, even Mutual building societies that became banks. They just get taken over by the big boys then liquidated under the parent company brand.

 

Bradford and Bingley closed by Santander/Abbey National

Woolwich taken over and closed by Barclays

 

Halifax is now owned by Bank of Scotland and part of the Lloyds/TSB group

Sainsbury's Bank are part of the Lloyds TSB Group

 

Just like the UK Energy and broadband market. It will eventually be controlled by a handful or big business in nothing more than a Cartel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Membership of the EU or not will not make one iota of difference with personal banking in the UK

 

We all know what happens with Private banks, even Mutual building societies that became banks. They just get taken over by the big boys then liquidated under the parent company brand.

 

Bradford and Bingley closed by Santander/Abbey National

Woolwich taken over and closed by Barclays

 

Halifax is now owned by Bank of Scotland and part of the Lloyds/TSB group

Sainsbury's Bank are part of the Lloyds TSB Group

 

Just like the UK Energy and broadband market. It will eventually be controlled by a handful or big business in nothing more than a Cartel.

 

 

Banks should be made smaller - currently they are too large which is why governments panic and prop them up with Tax payer cash. Make them smaller and they can then be allowed to fail.

  • Confused 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

During the referred speech I was talking about he said a few things that brung him to my attention he said And that is that he got a big applause from all sides for stepping downand he showed every one his P45.

 

Je actually ot a war crime tribunal recently (credit where credit is due)

 

 

bankersme

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is priceless !!

 

Man who wrote Article 50 says it was never supposed to be used

 

A former Italian premier has claimed that Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which, if triggered, would initiate Britain’s exit from the EU, was designed not for actual employment but as a deterrent - and he should know, he wrote the thing.

 

"I wrote Article 50, so I know it well," he told a conference in Rome last week.

"My intention was that it should be a classic safety valve that was there, but never used. It is like having a fire extinguisher that should never have to be used. Instead, the fire happened."

 

So why write the darn thing in the first place ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A former Italian premier has claimed???

 

More jornalistic licence in the actual headline??

 

 

 

By all accounts, the "former Italian premier" actually wrote the Treaty !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks should be made smaller - currently they are too large which is why governments panic and prop them up with Tax payer cash. Make them smaller and they can then be allowed to fail.

 

Thing is it was the government that allowed the merger of Natwest and RBS as well as the HBOS LTSB merger

 

Governments are IMO inherently corrupt and favour capitalism above all else , but you all know I am no fan of rampant capitalism - look how it worked for BHS

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the courts should be saying Well done Borris and David you acted in a democratic way and now It is lawful under our constitution and eu law to say we are now out of the EU.

 

 

The people have spoken ladies and gentleman

 

bankers4me

 

We are not out of the EU and wont be for at least 2 years -if ever

 

It still makes me sick to my stomach that people voted out , many without actually thinking of the potential consequences

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I dont have to do anything

 

bankers4me

thats a shame. i had thought that democracy, fought for over the years, wld involve voters actually considering what they are voting for :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a shame. i had thought that democracy, fought for over the years, wld involve voters actually considering what they are voting for :)

 

I did and I'm sure so did the majority of people. This wasn't an easy decision for me either but in the end, I voted with my head, not my heart.

 

Notice how things have gone quiet in London? I haven't heard of any demonstrations recently. Have you?

 

By allowing us to have a free vote is democracy in action. It just needs the Government to initiate the majorities wishes

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...