Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amazon.de/Evri - PAPLOC Now Court Claim - Lost returned Faulty AirPods


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,
I’m reaching out to share my recent experience with Amazon and to seek advice on how to proceed.


I purchased a pair of AirPods from Amazon.de, which developed a fault within the warranty period.


I contacted their customer support team, who instructed me to return the item. Unfortunately, the return package was lost in transit with the carrier.
I’ve had to pay for the return, which was shipped from the UK to Slovaki with evri.


I provided all the necessary information, including tracking details, to Amazon’s customer support on multiple occasions, but I still have not received a refund. Their reason for denying my claim was that the purchase was made more than two years ago. However, I reported the fault before the warranty period expired, which should make my refund request valid.


Of course, the loss of the return package was beyond my control.


I have informed Amazon that I am prepared to escalate the matter to the appropriate consumer protection agencies if it remains unresolved.


I am now seeking advice from fellow forum members on how to proceed with this matter.

Has anyone else experienced a similar situation, and if so, what steps did you take to resolve it?

 

Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Amazon.de/Evri - Lost returned Faulty AirPods

moved to the postal forum.

your target is evri they lost the item.

i suggest your type in evri in our search a read a good few 10-20+ threads

you'll soon get the idea.

just to be clear, did amazon issue the returns label?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I are interested to see that you told Amazon you were going to inform the appropriate consumer protection agencies.

 

Which particular consumer protection agencies did you have in mind?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The label was booked through Interparcel website.

I've reached out to Evri, but they're claiming they're not involved as the service used was EVRi International  
 

Quote

 Evri.com is not connected with international Evri therefore we have no access to orders or accounts when you use that site. Please see the below for details on how to raise an investigation:
The Evri International website is operated by Parcel2go.com Limited(with company number 02591405) under the Evri brand  (which is a trading name of Evri).

 

I've put in a claim against Parcel2Go.com, but they're rejecting it, saying I booked with InterParcel. 
Is it fair to hold them liable for the loss as the "operator" under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?

Link to post
Share on other sites

who sent you the returns label and who paid for it?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazon didn't issue the label.

Next time I will think twice when ordering from amazon.eu. They were extremely unhelpful here.

There are multiple reports about parcels getting rejected by the customs in their hub country (Slovakia) and being sent back to sender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, dx100uk said:

who sent you the returns label and who paid for it?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/04/2023 at 18:22, BankFodder said:

I are interested to see that you told Amazon you were going to inform the appropriate consumer protection agencies.

 

Which particular consumer protection agencies did you have in mind?

I would be very interested to get an answer to this question which I put to you 2 months ago.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was about research some agencies that could potentially help, but gave up fairly quickly. This is already not a nice experience.

To clarify, I have paid for and booked the courier myself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are not a third party to EVRI you employed them directly.

start a court claim?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, michealo said:

I was about research some agencies that could potentially help, but gave up fairly quickly. This is already not a nice experience.

To clarify, I have paid for and booked the courier myself. 

So I gather that you made threats to report to some agency although you didn't know which agency and in fact you never carried out your threat.

It's been two months since you last have visited this thread.

If you want to take control then now is the time to do it but no more bluffing.

As my site team colleague above who suggested – it is about time you started a court claim.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have started to file a court claim against Parcel2Go.com and they have rejected it as I booked with Interparcel.

The parcel was booked through interparcel and the service used was Evri International.

According to the website: The Evri International website is operated by Parcel2go.com Limited(with company number 02591405) under the Evri brand  (which is a trading name of Evri). 
 

Is Parcel2go.com my target here? is it fair to hold them liable for the loss as the "operator" under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Amazon.de/Evri - PAPLOC Now Court Claim - Lost returned Faulty AirPods
1 minute ago, michealo said:

I have started to file a court claim against Parcel2Go.com and they have rejected it as I booked with Interparcel.

so you filed a claim on MCOL against who? WHO was the defendant?

and they have already filed a defence?

post up your particulars. post up their defence

this is all rather confusing.

you need to be more clear to us WHAT you have done in 2mts..we are not mind readers?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim is against Parcel2Go.com. It's not a MCOL but a small claims court claim.


They disagree with the claim:
 

2.1. The Claimant on this order has confirmed that they booked an order with Interparcel and not Parcel2Go.com.
2.2. Interparcel is a third party service offering the same parcel solutions as Parcel2Go.com for people sending their parcels.
2.3. Parcel2Go.com have no connection to Interparcel or any of their services. 2.4. The Claimant is required to bring the claim against the correct company.


My Claim:
 

I am writing to address a regrettable situation involving a missing parcel, and I am now seeking compensation for this unfortunate occurrence.

The parcel, which bears the tracking number XXXX, was booked for delivery through 3rd party company (Interparcel).

Nevertheless, my claim is directly against Parcel2Go as the main contract for the delivery of the parcel was organized through them.

The item, originally meant to be an Amazon return, did not make it to my address for reasons currently unknown to me.

The financial value of the missing item is €220.84.

Therefore, I am requesting full compensation for my loss, which includes the original cost of the item as well as the associated shipping expenses.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

I trust that an amicable resolution can be reached swiftly, avoiding the need for further legal proceedings.

Yours faithfully, 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

small claims IS MCOL. or are you using the new website?

can you pop up your Particulars of claim please, thats your Letter of claim i assume you sent.

and their FULL defence, not just 3 points?

and 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then what did you put on the COURT claimform in the 'particulars of claim box' that your sent to the court and the court filed on Parcel2Go.com for them to file that defence back to the court/you?

or are you getting confused between that Letter of claim you sent to Parcel2Go.com and their reply. they call it a claim - it's not a court claim yet -  which you have not raised/started yet?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...