Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Being financially unable to pay back a charge order against my house

I have written the following letter to my water supply company requesting they apply for an order for sale to resolve the problem.

 

I realise that most people with a charge order would dread an Order For Sale but in my financial position I can't see any other way out.

 

I would rather be thrown out of my house soon rather than worry about it for decades.

 

I assume by asking the creditor to apply for an Order For Sale will overcome any court reluctance to grant one.

 

I also assume when a debtor askes to be punished then a court will punish on request.

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

 

I currently have a charge order placed against my house for water and sewerage arrears.

I am anxious to clear this as it adversely affects my credit rating and ability to obtain employment.

Living on a small private pension I am in no position to pay the charge order either by installments or a lump sum.

You wrote to me last year stating that you will take enforcement action unless I pay back the arrears.

 

I have therefore concluded that the only way to resolve this issue is for Bristol & Wessex Water to apply for an order for sale against my house.

Please advise regarding an order for sale so I can resolve this situation as soon as possible. I understand that an order for sale will eventually result in a repossession order that will allow me 28 days to vacate the property.

Please advise on your intended date of a court hearing in order to resolve this issue. I have started selling my personal posessions in order to vacate the property promptly after a reposession order has been issued.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Mike I don't understand your reply.

 

 

My plan WILL get rid of the charge order and give me peace of mind.

 

Why do you imply otherwise?

 

Hi IMS thanks for agreeing with Mike.

 

 

OK so how would you get rid of a charge order if you didn't have the money to do it?

 

 

Do you steal money to clear your debts?

 

 

I certainly don't.

 

What do you mean by "whatever next!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't thought this through. The course of action you are proposing is not wise. Please think rationally about this and put your own needs above any futile attempt to get revenge on the utility company. You need to understand a few points:

 

It is not the charging order that is affecting your ability to get credit/employment. It is the CCJ. It is the CCJ which goes on your credit record and it will stay there for 6 years regardless of what happens with the charging order. After 6 years the CCJ will drop off your record. An order for sale does not help you because it would not clean your credit record.

 

You should not worry about the prospect of having a charging order for decades. It honestly does not matter. Lots of people have charging orders against their property for a very long period of time. It simply means the creditor will get paid when the house is sold which could be decades from now. Having a charging order which sits there and does nothing is certainly much less stressful than having to find a new place to live with no money.

 

Asking for an order for sale is foolish. The reality is that if they do the sale, the house will probably be auctioned and you are unlikely to get the best possible price. If an order for sale is necessary you will become liable for their legal fees in addition to the debt. If you have decided to sell your house in order to pay back this debt, then you will achieve a better price through a private sale by marketing the house for sale through an estate agent in the normal way.

 

I am not sure on this point, but if it looks like you asked for the order for sale, I wonder if you would be classed as 'voluntary homeless'. If you fit into this category the local council will not help home you and they will not give you a council house (even if one is available in your area, which is very unlikely - due to housing shortages people are being kept in B&Bs for months). You should get out of your head any idea that the council will quickly find you a home and let you have a cushy life on benefits.

 

Personally, I think you are overreacting. You need to learn to accept that (1) you have a debt to this company, (2) you cannot afford the debt, (3) the debt is secured by a charging order and (4) the utility company will probably move you onto a pre-payment meter. There is nothing wrong with that and hundreds of thousands of people are in the same situation. They all manage to get on with their lives without trying to make themselves homeless. The most likely outcome is that the charging order will just sit there doing nothing, with the utility company getting paid when you decide to sell the house or when you pass away.

  • Haha 2

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't thought this through. The course of action you are proposing is not wise. Please think rationally about this and put your own needs above any futile attempt to get revenge on the utility company. You need to understand a few points:

 

It is not the charging order that is affecting your ability to get credit/employment. It is the CCJ. It is the CCJ which goes on your credit record and it will stay there for 6 years regardless of what happens with the charging order. After 6 years the CCJ will drop off your record. An order for sale does not help you because it would not clean your credit record.

 

This seems to imply that paying your debts is pointless. Therefore there must be something seriously wrong with the law. How on earth can a paid debt be as serious as an unpaid debt? Why does the law discourage you from paying your debts?

You should not worry about the prospect of having a charging order for decades. It honestly does not matter. Lots of people have charging orders against their property for a very long period of time. It simply means the creditor will get paid when the house is sold which could be decades from now. Having a charging order which sits there and does nothing is certainly much less stressful than having to find a new place to live with no money.

 

OK so why does my water supplier threaten me with enforcement if they have no intention to carry it out? There are no repayment terms on the CCJ or the charge order. Surely if my water supplier wait for decades for their money it won't be worth much in many decades.

 

 

Asking for an order for sale is foolish. The reality is that if they do the sale, the house will probably be auctioned and you are unlikely to get the best possible price. If an order for sale is necessary you will become liable for their legal fees in addition to the debt. If you have decided to sell your house in order to pay back this debt, then you will achieve a better price through a private sale by marketing the house for sale through an estate agent in the normal way.

 

The house is owned outright and in my name only. My wife left me over two years ago. I had a session with a solicitor regarding selling my house. The solicitor said that if I sell my house I will be in big trouble for selling my house with intention to deprive my absent wife of her half of the capital. However, if the water supplier force sell my house I cannot be held responsible for selling it to deprive my wife of her half. The blame would fall upon the water supplier and the court for ordering a sale without notifying my wife beforehand. The house is now worth about 250K and it will be interesting to see if the court order a sale for a debt of around £1,900.

 

I am not sure on this point, but if it looks like you asked for the order for sale, I wonder if you would be classed as 'voluntary homeless'. If you fit into this category the local council will not help home you and they will not give you a council house (even if one is available in your area, which is very unlikely - due to housing shortages people are being kept in B&Bs for months). You should get out of your head any idea that the council will quickly find you a home and let you have a cushy life on benefits.

I worked in well paid employment for 30 years, bought my house outright and have never claimed any benefits. However, I now seem to be punished by the system for doing so. If I had lived a cushy life on benefits I couldn't possibly have a charge order because I wouldn't own any property. Now if the court grant an order for sale I cannot see how requesting this can go against me. Orders for sale are granted to the creditor on application irrespective of the debtors opinion.

Personally, I think you are overreacting. You need to learn to accept that (1) you have a debt to this company, (2) you cannot afford the debt, (3) the debt is secured by a charging order and (4) the utility company will probably move you onto a pre-payment meter. There is nothing wrong with that and hundreds of thousands of people are in the same situation. They all manage to get on with their lives without trying to make themselves homeless. The most likely outcome is that the charging order will just sit there doing nothing, with the utility company getting paid when you decide to sell the house or when you pass away.

....
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading this thread for a while and trying to work out where your going with this. .... Because all advice is rejected.

 

So reading between the lines.

You can't sell the house on the open market because your wife would find out and you would have to pay her half.

 

But you think by the water co. selling the house you can get around this. "The blame would fall on the water supplier".......

Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems to imply that paying your debts is pointless. Therefore there must be something seriously wrong with the law. How on earth can a paid debt be as serious as an unpaid debt? Why does the law discourage you from paying your debts?
It is a decision made by credit reference agencies. If a CCJ is awarded against you, the credit reference agencies will record that for 6 years (though it falls off if paid within the first 28 days). If you pay the debt after 28 days it will be marked 'satisfied', which is better than 'unsatisfied' I suppose, but the CCJ will still remain on your record.
OK so why does my water supplier threaten me with enforcement if they have no intention to carry it out? There are no repayment terms on the CCJ or the charge order. Surely if my water supplier wait for decades for their money it won't be worth much in many decades.
Its pretty common for people to be threatened with enforcement, which can mean many things. The reality is that they are very unlikely to get an order for sale over a small amount. The amount will however be accruing interest at the rate of 8%.
The house is owned outright and in my name only. My wife left me over two years ago. I had a session with a solicitor regarding selling my house. The solicitor said that if I sell my house I will be in big trouble for selling my house with intention to deprive my absent wife of her half of the capital. However, if the water supplier force sell my house I cannot be held responsible for selling it to deprive my wife of her half. The blame would fall upon the water supplier and the court for ordering a sale without notifying my wife beforehand. The house is now worth about 250K and it will be interesting to see if the court order a sale for a debt of around £1,900.
I'm not sure about that advice. I don't think its correct to say that there is any issue with selling the house. The point is that under the normal allocation of assets on divorce your wife would end up with half, so if it was sold she would be able to claim half the proceeds. There would only be an issue if you tried to hide the proceeds in an offshore bank account or something like that. Honestly I don't think you should be too concerned about this aspect. Selling the house because you need to pay off a debt is a perfectly justifiable position.

 

However I still take the view that a sale of your house would be an overreaction to a relatively small debt. It sounds like being in debt is a new experience for you and you are struggling to cope. You should take comfort from the fact that many hundreds of thousands people are in the same position, some through no fault of their own. I would suggest getting in touch with nationaldebtline to discuss your options.

I worked in well paid employment for 30 years, bought my house outright and have never claimed any benefits. However, I now seem to be punished by the system for doing so. If I had lived a cushy life on benefits I couldn't possibly have a charge order because I wouldn't own any property. Now if the court grant an order for sale I cannot see how requesting this can go against me. Orders for sale are granted to the creditor on application irrespective of the debtors opinion.
Requesting an order for sale is unwise because (1) you'll be liable for the legal costs caused by the application and (2) you won't be in control of the sale process, hence the house is likely to be sold for a lower price than you would be able to achieve if you sold the house through an estate agent in the normal way.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received a reply from my water supplier as shown below.

 

Thank you for your email received on 14 June 2014.

 

I understand you would like us to apply for an order for sale for your property. This is something Bristol Wessex Billing Services Ltd will not do. The charge secures the debt for us and we are happy to wait for the debt to be paid.

 

I can accept a very small payment to cover this debt. This could be as little as £1.00 a month. If you would like to set an arrangement please call me on the number below.

 

This is interesting because it proves that their threats of further enforcement are simply carried out to cause stress and worry as a kind of mental cruelty.

 

Also if I take up their offer of paying £1 per month,then paying off the charge order will take around 158 years !!!!

 

Surely this is madness. I know people are living longer but surely not that long.

 

In 158 years time I will be 215 years old !

 

I've been reading this thread for a while and trying to work out where your going with this. .... Because all advice is rejected.

 

So reading between the lines.

You can't sell the house on the open market because your wife would find out and you would have to pay her half.

 

But you think by the water co. selling the house you can get around this. "The blame would fall on the water supplier".......

 

Yes because my wife's divorce solicitor can't accuse me of selling the house under her nose if there is a forced sale and auction instigated by the water supplier and the courts. I can't possibly be accused of selling something I haven't sold. I have also recently discovered that charge orders shouldn't be issued if there is a marriage breakup or divorce underway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received a reply from my water supplier as shown below.

 

Thank you for your email received on 14 June 2014.

 

I understand you would like us to apply for an order for sale for your property. This is something Bristol Wessex Billing Services Ltd will not do. The charge secures the debt for us and we are happy to wait for the debt to be paid.

 

I can accept a very small payment to cover this debt. This could be as little as £1.00 a month. If you would like to set an arrangement please call me on the number below.

 

This is interesting because it proves that their threats of further enforcement are simply carried out to cause stress and worry as a kind of mental cruelty.

Also if I take up their offer of paying £1 per month,then paying off the charge order will take around 158 years !!!!

Surely this is madness. I know people are living longer but surely not that long.

In 158 years time I will be 215 years old !

 

I doubt it...... You'll be dead and buried , but the Water co. will get their money then.

 

That's very kind of them. 25p per week is within any ones budget !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should just pay them the 1 a month they are looking for.

 

If you want to sell the house, you are still free to do so. There is no real reason why you can't sell property while divorce proceedings are going on. The fundamental point is that if you did sell, the ex-wife would generally be able to get half the sale proceeds. Most divorce disputes are exactly the opposite of your situation: generally, the partner who is left wants the house to be sold so that they can get their money, instead of the money sitting as equity in someone else's house which is totally useless to them. Of course the most conservative approach would be to agree what should happen with the wife's solicitor.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should just pay them the 1 a month they are looking for.

 

If you want to sell the house, you are still free to do so. There is no real reason why you can't sell property while divorce proceedings are going on. The fundamental point is that if you did sell, the ex-wife would generally be able to get half the sale proceeds. Most divorce disputes are exactly the opposite of your situation: generally, the partner who is left wants the house to be sold so that they can get their money, instead of the money sitting as equity in someone else's house which is totally useless to them. Of course the most conservative approach would be to agree what should happen with the wife's solicitor.

 

Hi Steampowered and thanks for your reply.

 

 

Maybe paying £1 per month would prevent my water supplier from applying for an order for sale however.

they have stated that they won't do that anyway.

Therefore what's the point of paying any instalments?

 

My absent wife hasn't registered an interest on the land registry regarding the house

 

so I could legally sell it and run away with all the money.

 

 

If I were to do this I assume I would have to hide all the money in cash so there would be no trace as to it's location.

 

 

Why my wife hasn't registered her interest on the land registry I just don't know.

 

 

A very strange an unusual situation indeed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steampowered and thanks for your reply. Maybe paying £1 per month would prevent my water supplier from applying for an order for sale however. they have stated that they won't do that anyway. Therefore what's the point of paying any instalments?

Stops them chasing you further.

 

My absent wife hasn't registered an interest on the land registry regarding the house

so I could legally sell it and run away with all the money. If I were to do this I assume I would have to hide all the money in cash so there would be no trace as to it's location. Why my wife hasn't registered her interest on the land registry I just don't know. A very strange an unusual situation indeed.

This is the bit that could get you into trouble if she goes ahead with asking the court to make an order about your respective assets. Not the actual selling of the house, the hiding of the money.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stops them chasing you further.

 

This is the bit that could get you into trouble if she goes ahead with asking the court to make an order about your respective assets. Not the actual selling of the house, the hiding of the money.

 

Yes indeed and should that happen I could claim that I had spent all the money on wine, women and song.

No court can freeze cash assets if the location of the cash is unknown. I know that a court can freeze a bank account when assets are in the account. However if the account contains little or no money the court can't really do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed and should that happen I could claim that I had spent all the money on wine, women and song.

No court can freeze cash assets if the location of the cash is unknown. I know that a court can freeze a bank account when assets are in the account. However if the account contains little or no money the court can't really do anything.

Worst case scenario is that the court makes an order for you to disclose information about where the money went, and then jails you for contempt of court when you fail to comply.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst case scenario is that the court makes an order for you to disclose information about where the money went, and then jails you for contempt of court when you fail to comply.

 

The court has to prove I am guilty and not my job to prove my innocence. Saying I spent the money on wine, women and song is disclosing where the money went. The court would then have to prove that I was hiding the money. How could the court prove I was hiding money when they have no evidence at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court has to prove I am guilty and not my job to prove my innocence. Saying I spent the money on wine, women and song is disclosing where the money went. The court would then have to prove that I was hiding the money. How could the court prove I was hiding money when they have no evidence at all?
You'd have to disclose bank statements and so on. The English legal system has very strong tools to require disclosure of evidence before any decision is made about guilt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd have to disclose bank statements and so on. The English legal system has very strong tools to require disclosure of evidence before any decision is made about guilt.

 

Yes I agree with you.

 

 

However, if the money has been drawn out of the bank and spent in cash then the court is stuffed.

 

Once it's spent and gone then it's spent and gone and that's that.

 

This is why the Government want a cashless society so they can track all transactions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have just received another threat letter from Bristol & Wessex Water

stating if I don't pay the debt they will take further enforcement action.

 

I wrote back and asked them what further enforcement action do they intend to take

despite them stating previously that they would not apply for an order for sale.

 

The letter also states that I am not allowed to sell my house until the debt is paid.

 

I told them that no court would grant an order for sale for a debt less than £10,000.

 

I also said that I would enter into a repayment plan as long as they remove the charge order.

 

Bristol & Wessex Water haven't replied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

About 2 1/2 years ago my water supply company placed a charge order on my house for a debt of around £1,900.

 

I recently received a letter from my water supply company

stating that they will take further enforcement if I don't enter into a repayment plan.

 

I contacted the company who said they can apply to the court for an attachment to earnings.

 

I found that puzzling because an attachment to earnings was never applied for

when the original CCJ was issued and I thought that the charge order secured the debt against my house.

 

 

Now if they are correct in saying that they can obtain an attachment to earnings,

then why didn't they do that rather than obtaining a charge order in the first place?

 

They also informed me that they can obtain an attachment to employment earnings

or have money deducted from benefits but cannot obtain money from someone living on a pension.

 

 

Does anyone know if that is correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have a charge order on my house for nearly £2000 from Bristol and Wessex Water.

 

 

They recently sent me a letter asking for the debt to be paid in full.

 

I am on a low income and in no position to pay the debt.

 

They said that they will take further enforcement action to force me to pay the debt.

 

I am puzzled because the charge order secures the debt against my house.

 

Why would they need to take further enforcement action when they have secured the debt?

 

I rang them and they told me that they could apply for an attachment to earnings

or benefits to recover the debt but not recover it from a pension.

 

I am living on a private pension so I assume they cannot recover the debt until the house is sold.

 

Is this correct?

 

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are correct.

 

 

tell about this debt

 

 

a bit more history please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...