Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/weightmans - claimform - Moneyway loan , i know nothing about


lovetobake
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well defaulted more than 6yr ago and has been removed

 

never to return.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, have received a letter today from Cabot, probably a standard letter which reads:

 

Thank you for your request for information under CCA 1974.

 

Cabor financial currently does not have this information on file.

 

However, we have requested the relevant information under section 77 and/or 78 of the CCA 1974 from the original lender.

 

We anticipate that we shall be able to provide this information within 40 days.

 

 

In the event we are unlikely to obtain this information within those time limits, we will write to you again.

 

Would appreciate guidance as to what I should do next.

 

 

I am suspecting that this is a standard fob off letter from Cabots trying to pull a fast one on me.

 

Will my defence be that they have failed to produce a valid agreement

and that if there were any such debt, which I am sure there isnt,

it would be statute barred?

 

LTB

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 22

 

unless you are 100% sure its SB'd.

 

did you have a loan from CITI Finance

moneyway typically inherited the admin of those early loans when CITI was sold off.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then I'd enter the statute barred defence now on MCOL

 

nicked from andyorch past thread

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

 

1. The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2. The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation action 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £x or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Regards

Andy

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx for your help, I will do that shortly. What is likely to happen next once I have filed the SB defence?

 

Once you have submitted your defence, the claimant has 28 days in which to advise if they wish to proceed. If they do, the court will inform you of the transfer of papers to YOUR local court and you will receive a Direction Questionaiire. Basically it requests a little more information from both you and the claimant.

 

If the claimant doesn't respond within 28 days, the claim will be automatically stayed (put on hold) by the court. Either party can apply to have the stay lifted. But there will be a fee for this.

 

Alternatively, if the claimant accepts/doesn't challenge your defence, then they should discontinue.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just filed the defence kindly provided by dx.

 

Does anyone know if you sign into the claim on MCOL whether or not the claimant has responded to anything you have done?

 

or can you only see what actions you have taken?

 

Many thanks

LTB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only the actions you have taken...if the claim is allocated...MCOL comes to an end and its then dealt with from your local County Court.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter received from court yesterday advising they have received defence and are serving it to cabot. Gather that this is just standrd practice and will just have to wait and see what Cabots next move will be.

 

Correct

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter today from sols saying:

 

"we write further to our receipt of your defence in which you state the account is statute barred.

We have today requested a copy of your statement of account,

together with copies of all previous written acknowledgements of the debt, from our clients

and will forward copies of these documents to you upon our receipt of the same.

 

By way of further information however, we note that following a default on the terms and conditions of your credit agreement,

which occurred in or around April 2009, the above account was terminated by Moneyway on June 1 2009,

before being assigned to Cabot Financial UK Limited on 30 August 2011.

 

Please note that as the last payment made towards your account was on 6th August 2009,

the account is not considered statute barred by virtue of section 29(5) Limitation Act 1980.

 

Accordingly, we have advised our client to oppose your defence and proceed with this matter to trial.

 

Should you wish to discuss the contents of this correspondence further, please do not hesitate to contact the writer."

 

OK now I dont know what to do.

There is nothing on my credit file,

I have not been known as the surname they say since 2008 and

I dont ever remember having any dealings with a company called Moneyway.

 

 

They have not accepted my defence, and Cabot are not able to supply me with documentary evidence,

so if they dont have any details how can the solicitors have the historical dates?

 

As always, advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Have I stuffed it by submitting a defence?

 

LTB

 

Just going to donate now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

std willy waving.

 

 

just reading back through the thread oleg and myself indicated strong links to buying CITI finance debts

 

 

does that name ring any bells

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if it was a CITI debt

 

they have a really hard time in getting your signed CCA

 

and an ever more hard time the CORRECT T&C's

 

going by other threads here I bet it was

as moneyway purchased the citi loans and regularly try and fleece people into paying up

hoping that if they try and obsure the true original of a debt behind numerous debt buyer

the mugs they erite too will blindly cough up.

 

think you are on a winner here

 

 

they've still gotta honour the CCA regardless to your SB defence.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

O thankyou dx, I thought I had blown it.

 

I have just checked the other credit ref agencies and it is def not on there.

 

Will I still be able to contest this all the way to the court if they dont cough up the docs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

next move is theirs as andy says.

 

 

you have contested it already.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

next reply received.

 

I have had a letter from weightmans offering me a deal to settle.

Now I guess they realise that they are clutching at straws here because,

if I did ever have a debt with them which I honest to god cant remember, s

o I am pretty sure I didnt, then it is most definately statute barred as per my defence.

 

They have not come up with any paperwork or proof to the contrary.

 

They say they want to try and resolve the matter amicably without the need to incur costs.

 

how should I reply?

I am not entering into any agreement with them and want to tell them to go and do one!

 

 

I will take my chance if they proceed down the court route because I really dont think I had any dealings with them.

 

Thanks folks

LTB

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, my next question to you guys is, how should I reply? I am not entering into any agreement with them and basically want to tell them to go and do one! I will take my chance if they proceed down the court route because I really dont think I had any dealings with them.

 

Answered your own question there...dont reply

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please give us something before we have to run away

 

your SB defence is already absolute protection

and all you need to say to them.

 

ruddy fleecers

good job you came to cag.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

 

following on from my last post,

I have still yet to reply to Weightmans but still trying to work out what I should write.

 

I have today received letter from Cabot stating that they are still trying to obtain the info I asked for in my CCA request from the lender,

but my account will remain on hold until such time as they can comply with my request.

However, I am still obliged to pay the debt and theyn would recommend that I contact them asap to set up a repayment plan.

 

They are obviously banking on me being stupid and not have found a wonderful site such as this one. Unlucky them on both accounts!

 

I am thinking about sending the same letter both to Cabot and Weightmans

stating that I dispute ever owing the sum of £**** to Moneyway or Cabot or any other company

and will continue to dispute unless they can prove otherwise.

 

 

In the unlikely event that they are able to produce the signed agreement,

any such debt would most certainly be Statute Barred as the so called debt you are trying to pin on me is in my maiden name which I have not used for over 7 years.

 

What do you think caggers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 46 you do NOTHING.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...