Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I need to get a hamster. lol
    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

work programme after 2 years


bcham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3405 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my interview/interrogation is in less than 2 or 3 hours time.:!::

 

well that was all very interesting....

 

the session lasted 50 minutes. I was initially given a copy of the exit review to read and keep.

 

the DWP interviewer was amazed at the contents.... in the actions agreed, it stated "continue to overcome health barriers, continue with job search"

the further information field was blank.

in the next steps field - "continue with job search, and overcoming health problems"

 

Form complete!!!!!

 

to add insult to injury, the advisor named was one that left 4 advisors ago, but their computer system still had a note to see her from 20 months ago, which could not be removed, as she had been deleted from the system. as such we do not know who filled in the form.

 

the DWP interviewer was interested in the exit session, consisting of between 20 to 25 of us, with them trying to sign us all up for a council run course. the DWP advisor said it should have been a 1 to 1... he was interested when I said our joint exit review was putting our name, email address and telephone number on piece of paper, and they had cancelled my scheduled appointment with my new advisor 3 days prior to the mass exit review.

 

I am now seeing 1 of 2 DWP advisors every 2 weeks, on my normal signing in day, but the time is variable - my old time was late afternoon, so I don't mind.

 

I have to search the universal jobs match 3 times a week, search 3 agency sites once a week, and do one other thing to reach my goal of 7 job search actions per week, and apply for 2 jobs per week. I currently do around 58 actions per week, as I am registered with 7 agencies and the universal jobs match to receive daily job vacancy emails.

 

so! for anyone going on a post work programme support session, go prepared, with a copy of your cv's and a list of what actions you take every week to find work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

well that was all very interesting....

 

the session lasted 50 minutes. I was initially given a copy of the exit review to read and keep.

 

the DWP interviewer was amazed at the contents.... in the actions agreed, it stated "continue to overcome health barriers, continue with job search"

the further information field was blank.

in the next steps field - "continue with job search, and overcoming health problems"

 

Form complete!!!!!

 

to add insult to injury, the advisor named was one that left 4 advisors ago, but their computer system still had a note to see her from 20 months ago, which could not be removed, as she had been deleted from the system. as such we do not know who filled in the form.

 

the DWP interviewer was interested in the exit session, consisting of between 20 to 25 of us, with them trying to sign us all up for a council run course. the DWP advisor said it should have been a 1 to 1... he was interested when I said our joint exit review was putting our name, email address and telephone number on piece of paper, and they had cancelled my scheduled appointment with my new advisor 3 days prior to the mass exit review.

 

I am now seeing 1 of 2 DWP advisors every 2 weeks, on my normal signing in day, but the time is variable - my old time was late afternoon, so I don't mind.

 

I have to search the universal jobs match 3 times a week, search 3 agency sites once a week, and do one other thing to reach my goal of 7 job search actions per week, and apply for 2 jobs per week. I currently do around 58 actions per week, as I am registered with 7 agencies and the universal jobs match to receive daily job vacancy emails.

 

so! for anyone going on a post work programme support session, go prepared, with a copy of your cv's and a list of what actions you take every week to find work.

 

 

Thanks Cubert. At the moment I look on 8 sites per day including UJM, apply for 20-30 jobs per week., I am also completing a Sage 50 course and just got the paperwork to start an NVQ2 Business and Admin course online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

courses can be a good thing, and prove to a prospective employer that you are not in a rut.

 

I have a 1994 BTEC HNC in Business & Finance , which is the equivalent to a NVQ5, so most courses won't let me join, as they will not get funding.

 

I have previously tried to get on a ECDL computer course, but my former WP provider would not pay, as they would lose money. they put me on a course to get 2 halves of an NVQ1 in health & safety at work, and something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

courses can be a good thing, and prove to a prospective employer that you are not in a rut.

 

I have previously tried to get on a ECDL computer course, but my former WP provider would not pay, as they would lose money.

 

Some courses are worth doing if they are relevant and genuinely improve your prospects of employment. I found a local (free) ECDL course and scored some 70% on the assessment, but quickly found that it was the most basic of introductions to using Microsoft Office - A waste of my time.

 

Also did a three day HSE First Aid at Work course that I found and paid for - Whilst it didn't get me a job, it has proved worthwhile in town on a couple of occasions and I'm now an official firstaider at work so will get my retests paid for.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and proving you cannot teach your grandmother to suck eggs....:madgrin:

 

in other words, I am doing way over and above what they want, so they can leave me alone, and sort out those who don't.:-x. if they do start, then I can drop my job hunting down over 90% and still be within the limits.:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

and proving you cannot teach your grandmother to suck eggs....:madgrin:

 

in other words, I am doing way over and above what they want, so they can leave me alone, and sort out those who don't.:-x. if they do start, then I can drop my job hunting down over 90% and still be within the limits.:roll:

I've been doing way over the odds for a while and I seem to be targeted by this chap advisor..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been doing way over the odds for a while and I seem to be targeted by this chap advisor..

 

discounting the Work programme external sources, as far as the DWP are concerned, they cannot force you to do more than your job centre agreement ( ES3JP ), which you and a member of staff signed. If they do want you to do more, then they have to issue you with a new jobseekers agreement, which you can appeal against. I did appeal once, when they made a mistake on the form, which is why I always read what I am signing and never take the work of the person asking me to sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

discounting the Work programme external sources, as far as the DWP are concerned, they cannot force you to do more than your job centre agreement ( ES3JP ), which you and a member of staff signed. If they do want you to do more, then they have to issue you with a new jobseekers agreement, which you can appeal against. I did appeal once, when they made a mistake on the form, which is why I always read what I am signing and never take the work of the person asking me to sign.

 

I am applying as I have found theses jobs I am capable of doing. It's a case of throwing enough mud at the walls and hoping some of it sticks!lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I got yesterday, anyone else got one of these?

 

click on image for larger size.

RwGqbsns.jpg

FIEyaZrs.jpg

f5vlkg7s.jpg

xXFiO9ms.jpg

cNjNso3s.jpg

cY8qsj9s.jpg

Edited by Dom86
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just before my 'PWPS' appointment yesterday, I had an interview, suited up, paid £3.80 for the bus :-x (gone up again), did a bit of interview practice in the library, then went to the interview, and I got told the person whom was meant to interview me wasn't in today, and would contact me to rearrange, not heard back, phoned just before end of work day, effectively got told they didn't have a clue.

 

SIGH, sounds like another dodgy business :sad:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 month ago, a recruitment agency sent me to a business in 'Loughton, Essex' for a job, I turned up there and everyone was waiting outside, business just closed down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 month ago, a recruitment agency sent me to a business in 'Loughton, Essex' for a job, I turned up there and everyone was waiting outside, business just closed down.

 

I have seen a couple 9no regular) jobs advertised for an administrator, I sent my cv and got rang back for an interview with an assessor.

 

on investigating the company, it was not for a specific job. it was for a training course. people went for the interview, were told they lacked the skills/experience, but they could buy the course off them.

 

I cancelled the interview, and have not applied for the 'vacancies' which I see regulary advertised, as a 'two tier' application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I got yesterday, anyone else got one of these?

 

click on image for larger size.

RwGqbsns.jpg

FIEyaZrs.jpg

f5vlkg7s.jpg

xXFiO9ms.jpg

cNjNso3s.jpg

cY8qsj9s.jpg

I note that the copyright is "The Behavioural Insight Team£ aka "the nudge unit".

This makes me immediately suspicious! Have you been told (by JSD) to do this?

Has anyone confirmed that this is part of your JSA? - If so you would be asked to agree to it.

 

If I was presented with this I would decline to complete and refer them to my existing JSA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that the copyright is "The Behavioural Insight Team£ aka "the nudge unit".

This makes me immediately suspicious! Have you been told (by JSD) to do this?

Has anyone confirmed that this is part of your JSA? - If so you would be asked to agree to it.

 

If I was presented with this I would decline to complete and refer them to my existing JSA.

 

I glad you noticed that 'Re. "The Behavioural Insights Team, aka 'the nudge unit'", I was going to allude to that. Its been privatized now too, I think.

 

The Jobcentre told me to do this.

 

Looking at my new 'Jobseekers Agreement', under 'Other activties I will do to improve my changes of finding work', its says; "I will bring in a written account of my Jobsearch, using commitments booklet."

 

I'm assuming the "commitments booklet" is what's depicted in the pictures in previous post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the booklet looks like a red tape nightmare for everyone involved, and seeing as the Jobcentre and Work Programme, both told me to cut down my Jobsearch list months ago, because it was too long!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I glad you noticed that 'Re. "The Behavioural Insights Team, aka 'the nudge unit'", I was going to allude to that.

 

Note the heading on page 2, "My job seeker journey", the scripty font on the following page, and the blatant misuse of the apostrophe - All smacks of A4e involvement in drawing it up.... For some reason, barge pole springs to mind.

 

Oh, and I would fail on at least three counts on the "job seeker journey". No updated "about me" profile, no UJ account, and certainly no "voicemail" - As for email, they can always send it to /dev/null :madgrin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr.P,

Your comment

All smacks of A4e involvement in drawing it up

has prompted me to look again at this document.

Several things strike me:

1. I can see no official DWP reference number for the form - just the copyright - not of the DWP but of the Nudge Unit.

2. The language used (e.g. "journey", "about you") is reminiscent of A4e documents and even the fonts used appear to be identical to those used by A4greed in their introductory booklet. Either the Nudge Unit has plagiarised A4e stuff or there has been some input from A4e. Has the infamous Oliffe-Cooper joined the Nudge Unit following his being shown the door at A4e I wonder!

The involvement of the Nudge Unit poses some questions.

Are people being mandated by JSD or JSag to use this "toolkit"?, If so is it standard procedure for all WP returnees? If not standard procedure for all how does the selection process work, i.e. what factor(s) are used to determine which of the WP rejects are subject to this and which aren't?

Is this another half baked Nudge Unit experiment along the lines of the fake psychometric testing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

courses can be a good thing, and prove to a prospective employer that you are not in a rut.

 

I have a 1994 BTEC HNC in Business & Finance , which is the equivalent to a NVQ5, so most courses won't let me join, as they will not get funding.

 

I have previously tried to get on a ECDL computer course, but my former WP provider would not pay, as they would lose money. they put me on a course to get 2 halves of an NVQ1 in health & safety at work, and something else.

Learndirect does ECDL

Or at least they did middle of last year

Try your local one and see if you can get a ECDL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Learndirect does ECDL

Or at least they did middle of last year

Try your local one and see if you can get a ECDL

 

near me, pertemps used to run the learndirect ecdl scheme. I signed up to do it, but when they found out about my HNC, said that they would not get funding for me to do it, so ripped up the forms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother has been to his first work program thingy & is full of high hopes! Although it was a bit crazy, considering they tried to show him how to use a pc mouse, he is a whiz on pc's lol They seem to think they'll be able to help him find work due to his computer skills. I hope they're not building him up for a fall! He was close to going back on the Citalopram recently but at the moment is feeling positive & apparently the side affects for the first couple of weeks wipe him out, so no good for this work program!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...