Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HCE HCEO at my door - sons unpaid university fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a visit this morning from a HCEO, he left a note saying it was regarding my sons unpaid university fees, he left early to get a job and they are chasing him.

 

Problem is he is now working abroad until at least June, and doesn't live with us anymore.

 

Can they still enforce any order, we havent spoken to them or let them in yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the student loans lot got a ccj?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having spoken to him its not his student loan, it was because he left the course early and the student loan hadn't kicked in for the new period so his debt is with the uni, he didn't understand at the time and thought it was the usual student loan but obviously it isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so 'someone' has got a CCJ

 

who is it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter says the university he was at back in 2010, I do recall him speaking to them at the time but it obviously got him nowhere.

 

The letter says that they are intending to return within 24hrs to remove goods etc, I take it they cant do this if he doesn't live with us anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am worried by your earlier post where you stated that "we haven't spoken to them or let them in YET.....

 

If you allow this HCEO to come into home this will be the worst mistake that you will make for a while !!!

 

I would suggest that you send a text message to the HCEO and email the company to advise them that the property is yours and that the debt relates to your son and that he is working abroad and furthermore, that you will not under any circumstances allpw anyone into your home.

 

Which company is this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom, having read your advice to others, I have no intention of letting them in or speaking with them direct, just really wanted a bit of reassurance that I was right because we are still not getting over a bailiff visit back in 2009 for a parking fine which left us all totally shocked.

 

I will text him now and email the company. my son is a good lad who has had to move away to get work and dont want these jackals after him at this stage in his life.

 

Can they do anything else if he isnt here ?

Edited by jotty
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think they can do diddly squat if he is abroad,

 

you could swear a Statutory declaration that all goods and chattels are yours,

and send it to the University and the HCEO, and that further enforcement against yourself for a third party debt will leave them open to action for fraud and harassment.

 

What HCEO is this?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its HCEGroup, my lad will end up paying this when he gets back, albeit at £5 per wk if they are lucky as I am first in the queue !, but we dont need the hassle atm of the constant knock on the door etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could p'haps prevent further issues here

 

as you aware , that he got the claim form, telling him about the court case against him.?

 

if it can be proved that they got judgement by default because he was served no papers etcetc

 

it can be set aside.

 

do you know if he has checked his cra file to see if he has a CCJ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have helped caggers in the past with HCE and unlike some others I won't mention, it transpired they can 'listen' and work with you...I sometimes find myself wondering if all the office staff actually understand what is being asked or told to them as its often been a case of it boiling down to the luck of the draw as to who answers the phone and has the brainpower to grasp a situation.....

 

dx has a valid question regards your son actually having been served with the paperwork, if he can show that was sent to an incorrect address then he can indeed apply to set aside. However as he is outside the UK he would struggle unless he can instruct a solicitor to act on his behalf and the Courts have an 'ideal to any action for set aside being brought as soon as the 'defendant' becomes aware of the judgment by default.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

No he was in Uk according to the date on the CRA entry, but not living with us.

 

He would pick up his mail as and when usually every 4-5 weeks and has said nothing about this.

 

I will pay the debt for him at some stage but refuse to pay the fees, original debt was £1600 and the HCEO's want £2600 from him so I think they have added a few fees which I am asking questions about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you probably know, you cannot discuss or deal with this on behalf of your Son for Data Protection reasons, unless your Son provides the enforcement officers with his consent.

 

The enforcement officers should refuse to deal with you, unless your Son contacts them to advise them that they may provide details to you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Despite me writing and emailing this bunch to tell them my son is not at my address and there are no assets or things belonging to him here they have been again today and left a notice saying they can remove property without his notice. My question is what do they expect to take and is this now classed as harassment. Any advice please so I can write back to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a statutory declaration that swears he doesnt live there and has no belongings? A simple email or letter wont suffice as the bailiff could easily see it as you trying to evade them. If you get a stat dec, then its a whole different ballgame.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well first of all he has to gain entry & this has to be done peacefully. If he cannot gain entry then he is up the creek without a paddle. He may try to levy on goods outside - a car - but if it is not the goods of the debtor then again he is out of luck. The Stat Dec route is a good idea and no you are under no compulsion to reveal his current whereabouts either. A Stat Dec can be done at most Solicitors - cost approx £10.

 

 

 

 

 

STATUTORY DECLARATION

 

I,____________________________ ______________

 

address_________________________________________________

 

_______________________________________________________

 

make the following declaration under the Statutory Declarations Act 1835:

 

All items contained within the property at the above address and within it's boundaries, are owned by Mr XXX XXXX & Mrs XXX XXXX . There are no items within the property or it's boundaries belonging to any other person.

 

I understand that a person who intentionally makes a false statement in a statutory declaration is guilty of an offence under section 11 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, and I believe that the statements in this declaration are true in every particular.

 

Signed:

 

 

Declared at___________________on__________________of 20___

Before me,

 

 

Full Name___________________________Qualification____________

 

 

Address__________________________________________________

of person before whom the declaration is made (in printed letters)

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This PDF for Statutory Declaration may be of use:

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, so I just call into a solicitor to get it signed, is that correct?

 

Yes that is what you do, i would get 3 signed notarised copies, one to keep, one to send to HCEO, and one for the creditor. I think you can also swear one at a magistrates court.

 

Do not let the HCEO in you could had him a photocopy of the stat dec indicating that the original has been provided at the office.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HCE HCEO at my door - sons unpaid university fees
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...