Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hoping somebody can help. I have council tax arrears of about £3,300 for 2010-11 and 2011-12. Council have set up several arrangements and because the monthly payments were unrealistic, I was unable to keep up payments, so they have now passed it on to Rossendales.

 

Council have said to contact Rossendales but I haven't contacted them yet (it was passed to them yesterday). My income is well below £16k per year, but because of the trauma of financial hardship and trying to keep my head above water, I have been unable to complete the paperwork to the Council's satisfaction and am not in receipt of the 75% or so reduction I should be entitled to.

 

A few questions - how do I deal with the bailliffs/prevent them from visiting, is there any documentation I should be in receipt of from the council or Rossendales.

 

Getting a bit panicky here so quick responses appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your income is as stated then the Council may see you as a won't pay instead of a can't pay. This is a priority debt and the ultimate sanction they have is for imprisonment. If you are having difficulties filling in the I&E forms then you must seek help to do so as these forms also are a legal requirement for which the Council have powers to take you to Court. They may even go for an Attachment of Earnings if you are working whereby you have no say in what is deducted.

 

You need to find out exactly your position with regards to what is owing. You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

In the meantime you should make the time & effort to start paying the Council, this can be done by online banking, Council website or automated phone line. To do this you must pay the same amount at the same interval - £10 every Thursday for example. This builds a payment history very quickly and puts you firmly in control, as should the Council seek further enforcement they will find it difficult.

 

As for the Bailiff, there is no law that says you have to speak to or deal with him. He may utter lots of threats but as long as you deny him access to your home or prevent him gaining a levy outside - a car perhaps - then he is powerless.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your income is as stated then the Council may see you as a won't pay instead of a can't pay. This is a priority debt and the ultimate sanction they have is for imprisonment. If you are having difficulties filling in the I&E forms then you must seek help to do so as these forms also are a legal requirement for which the Council have powers to take you to Court. They may even go for an Attachment of Earnings if you are working whereby you have no say in what is deducted.

 

You need to find out exactly your position with regards to what is owing. You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

In the meantime you should make the time & effort to start paying the Council, this can be done by online banking, Council website or automated phone line. To do this you must pay the same amount at the same interval - £10 every Thursday for example. This builds a payment history very quickly and puts you firmly in control, as should the Council seek further enforcement they will find it difficult.

 

As for the Bailiff, there is no law that says you have to speak to or deal with him. He may utter lots of threats but as long as you deny him access to your home or prevent him gaining a levy outside - a car perhaps - then he is powerless.

 

PT

 

Why would they see me as a won't pay? There are two liability orders, the most recent dated July 2011. It was passed to bailliffs yesterday. Should I call bailliffs to try to arrange a payment plan or just pay the council each week and try to avoid the bailiffs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should, if possible, avoid dealing with the bailiffs as they are likely to add lots of fees to your account and your payments will go to cover these fees before reducing your debt to the council.

 

As a question, why do you think your cue entitled to a 75% discount on the council tax? As far as I'm aware you can only claim discounts under certain circumstances such as single occupancy (25%) empty home if fully empty (no furniture) but only for a matter of months, student household (but only if all occupants are students) and, if you don't meet the criteria or can't provide proof of entitlement, you won't get any discount.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last payment was £300 in March 2012. The reason for believing that I am eligible for council tax benefit is that my annual income is below £16,000. According to www.turn2us.org.uk I should be eligible for the maximum council tax benefit, which is about 25% of the usual monthly amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Why would they see me as a won't pay? There are two liability orders, the most recent dated July 2011. It was passed to bailliffs yesterday. Should I call bailliffs to try to arrange a payment plan or just pay the council each week and try to avoid the bailiffslink3.gif?"

Regardless of the circumstances leading to it, you have a history of breaking payment arrangements, unless you can show the Council otherwise they would see any regular income should be ' managed' to meet priority debts ie: Council Tax....if you consider you may be entitled to CT rebate please remember that while a claim to that is being processed you are obliged to continue making regular payments to the liability order/s in place.

 

It is such you can pay the Council using their atuomated payment facilities but you will need to budget for bailiffs legitimate fees, £24.50 1st visit and £18 2nd visit..to get you into a position that could cease enforcement you will need to ensure you make regular weekly/fortnightly/monthly payments of a set amount on a set day/date...this will quickly show you are a 'can't pay'at the rate they want but I you cannot be seen as a 'won't pay'

 

Bailiffs will attend and it is here you will need to be vigilant...if they do not get access to your home or find anything outside (a car) to levy upon then there is little they can do other than return the debt to the Council when they get fed up.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last payment was £300 in March 2012. The reason for believing that I am eligible for council tax benefit is that my annual income is below £16,000. According to www.turn2us.org.uk I should be eligible for the maximum council tax benefit, which is about 25% of the usual monthly amount.

 

Withholding payment because you think you are eleigible for CT Benefit is not a valid excuse. You are supposed to continue paying and if you then end up paying too much you either get a credit against future bills or you can ask for a refund.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of what that website says, Im afraid on your income you wont be entitled to any council tax benefit

 

I haven't said what my income is - only that it is below £16k. What is the real figure they take into account? Or am I wasting my time because income is not a factor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sorry must have mis-read it. However, as you said less then 16k, I assume it is between 15 -16k (otherwise it makes sense you would have stated a lower figure).

 

I cant give you the exact cut off figure as it varies between councils but if its over 11k it is highly unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not "withholding" payment - I simply haven't had the regular income coming in. I am going to try to make a small payment each week to build up a payment history.

Do I take it you are self employed.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI... This debt wouldnt have been passed to Rossendales without liability orders already in place.

It is practice for the LA to try and obtain payment from you first by their own methods prior to sending the debt to an outside agency.

 

The previous statement made is correct - you should continue to pay your council tax in accordance with your bill regardless of an application being in place for possible council tax benefit. Once your account has been summonsed you lose the right of paying by instalments and the full amount of council tax then becomes due.

 

Most councils will offer you a payment arrangement after this - usually based on your financial circumstances.

This will include costs from the summons and the liability order etc. This arrangement must be kept to or further recovery action continues - this is usually by a bailiff or even pre-committal action by the LA.

Council Tax after Mortgage, Rent, CCJs etc is a priority debt. I would suggest you try and make an arrangement with Rossendales and in the meantime try and sort out your benefit claim.

[EDIT].

Find a way to pay - try and get a mutually agreed amount with Rossendales by offering them your full income & expenditure.

 

Unlike most other debts Council Tax does possibly get to the point of committal action and the court will decide if it is Culpable Neglect (wont pay) or that you have had no means to pay. If it does go to court you could find not only have you incurred even more costs, but also that you will have a court arrangement that you WILL have to pay without question. I hope you get this sorted out and really think you need to sort your benefits and talk to Rossendales.

Try to pay the council direct Rossers will want a levy, and will engineer a default to add more fees they are not to be trusted, a bailiff would not know the truth if he fell over it, or it slapped him around the chops with a freshly caught sullen looking trout.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to seek advice from a free debt adviser, such as CAB or Shelter and ask for the debt to be returned to court for a means assessment, so that what you can afford can be suitably calculated. You need to do this quickly to prevent further bailiff costs and levying of goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to seek advice from a free debt adviser, such as CAB or Shelter and ask for the debt to be returned to court for a means assessment, so that what you can afford can be suitably calculated. You need to do this quickly to prevent further bailiff costs and levying of goods.

 

The magistrates are not involved in this any further than rubber stamping a Liability Order, there is nothing in the Council tax Enforcement legislation to allow a court to do diddly squat at this stage, They cannot ask the court for a means assesment as it is not a fine or a criminal action, it is up to the council to agree a payment plan, or more likely tell OP to deal with rossers. The court will only be involved again if the council decide to go for committal to prison for wilful non payment, and that is a way down the road. Op has had good advice so far, but by all means they could go to CAB.

 

The only way to avoid a levy is to hide a car, and do not let the bailiff in. deny him a levy and he is relatively powerless, and the only legit fees he can ask for are a first and second visit fee a total of £42.50

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an adviser in this area, returning the matter to court is something that I do for clients on a regular basis, with success.

 

For council tax?

 

perhaps you can fill us in how you do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an adviser in this area, returning the matter to court is something that I do for clients on a regular basis, with success.

 

I would be most interested to see how you accomplish this one as many believe magistrates can't interfere in enforcement of council tax regarding setting payment levels, as normally this is out of their hands surely? Unless this is done as an oral assessment of means prior to a council seeking commital to prison, for willful non payment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have a council debt of £900 which relates to 2011-12

where I applied for council tax benefit but the claim was denied

because the council "couldn't open" the PDF bank statements, etc.

 

Instead they requested 100+ pages of paper copies,

which I was unable to do because I couldn't afford the photocopies or toner for my printer.

 

Because I missed their deadline, the claim was denied.

 

I reapplied a few months later and this time provided paper copies (although they were able to open the PDFs this time).

 

However, by this time they decided that they couldn't backdate the claim,

which would have effectively cancelled out the £900 they say I owe.

 

I took the matter to an appeal and then an independent tribunal but both found in the council's favour,

because it was deemed I didn't have a valid reason for not supplying the info they requested.

 

Anybody who has been in debt will understand the feelings of helplessness and inability to do basic tasks,

but apparently councils or anybody affiliated to them don't.

 

The result is that I have £900 to pay,

 

so I asked the council if I could set up a payment plan with them.

 

They agreed but only through Rossendales, their friendly bailiff associates.

 

Given Rossendales atrocious track record for payments going astray,

I can see this debt increasing over time,

 

so my question is,

 

can I set up direct payments with the council?

Is there a precedent or legal case I can show them

- I would much prefer to pay the council direct rather than Rossendales.

 

Thanks, D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their inability to open pdf is strange, complaints to Council CEO, Leader and your MP are an option, but pay council direct

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

defo pay council direct. send emails advising you will be paying XX per month on top of your current council tax payment. That way if it ever gets took to a judge or court, you can say hey look ive been paying XX extra a month to clear arrears and didn't acknowledge any debt with rossendales. I made the mistake years ago of paying via bristow and sutor and ended up easily paying 1.5 times the original debt. That was before i found these sites :D

 

also dont ignore the debt as this is one of the debts that you can actually go to prison over :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

well only if you say you 'wont pay'

rather that 'cant pay'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...