Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think that for many people the 'just curious' checking is largely unacceptable and the suggestion that everyone is at it doesn't necessarily mean that it's right.

 

I can imagine the outrage on here if someone saw an advisor checking their profile or indeed posting on w2w forums about what they had seen.

  • Haha 1

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

But surely the point is, whatever your stance on the subject matter, if a profile is PUBLIC and out there for all to be seen then that is sheer stupidity and they obviously have no worries about the profile being open for all to see (or are too stupid to restrict access) My GB profile is friends only and last year I also got rid of loads of people who I no longer see or hear from or were simply aquaintances - I now have 22 people as friends on my profile not 597 or whatever like some people.

 

The fact is, I am not malicious, unless something she said was totally inappropriate or against a specific person I would not take it further. It is good to have ammunition if needed though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I and I also think most others agree with you. As I said I don't even let my mum see mine and my nephew will not let his right on aunty or me see his.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure Mat can fight his own battles but he did explain that, he is not stalking , he was just curious. Have you never looked up someone you know or a friend of a friend to see what's going on. I have my advisors mobile number and she popped up when I did a search based on my contacts

 

 

 

No never, as if they aren't a personal friend of mine. i couldn't give 2 hoots what they are posting on their facebook. its their business and none of mine.

 

 

I think that for many people the 'just curious' checking is largely unacceptable and the suggestion that everyone is at it doesn't necessarily mean that it's right.

 

I can imagine the outrage on here if someone saw an advisor checking their profile or indeed posting on w2w forums about what they had seen.

 

Exactly! :wink:

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that for many people the 'just curious' checking is largely unacceptable and the suggestion that everyone is at it doesn't necessarily mean that it's right.

 

I can imagine the outrage on here if someone saw an advisor checking their profile or indeed posting on w2w forums about what they had seen.

 

There might be outrage - I love this forum, I really do, that's why I help to mod it, but there are days when we could generate outrage about fluffy kittens riding on unicorns.

 

If you (general "you", not you personally) don't want people reading some particular fact about you or seeing some particular picture of you then for heaven's sake, don't post it on FB. Or at the very least, learn how to lock down privacy settings. If something's posted publicly, I and most other people will assume it's fair game to read.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed if you don't want people to know about it don't post it on the open internet

 

I can remember that I was told by my boss that I shouldn't have a gaydar profile as I could bring PepsiCo into disrepute ! This from a ?

 

Signed

Outraged from Hinckley

 

Sadly I know people who have learnt the hard way. Another forum owners has published pictures of their houses and telephone numbers suggesting she was a lady of misplaced virtue

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its well known dwp do at times look at claimants profiles on facebook, for example benefit fraud. If dwp can look at any open profiles, work programme providers and dwp employees if you care to look at them for whatever reason, are fair game too. There is no shame in having a nose and stalking is something very very different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly couldn't care less how people percieve what I am looking at, she has stupidly left her profile as public, it is not stalking and is not breaking any laws.

 

Today's offering:

 

"So glad I have Monday off need a break from seeing idiots"

 

Charming person eh?!

 

Disclaimer: Of course she could mean colleagues not claimants but I doubt it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mat

I think a complaint to the manager is in order with some screen shots of the posts.

If you are feeling generous a word in her ear. Without knowing what your relationship is like with her all I can say is I tend to think the complaint is in order as she can not be allowed to post this sort of thing in public

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mat

I think a complaint to the manager is in order with some screen shots of the posts.

If you are feeling generous a word in her ear. Without knowing what your relationship is like with her all I can say is I tend to think the complaint is in order as she can not be allowed to post this sort of thing in public

 

I am not stupid, I have screen shot everything I have seen and pasted it in to my own document. My relationship with her isn't bad but is not good either - just see each other, do what is asked and gone. She isn't nasty or vindictive and as I am not malicious I am finding it harder to report her. I guess I am waiting for her to be nasty to me or do something I do not agree with but I also think she needs to be told. To be honest, I am not sure what to do at the moment particularly as I am now on ESA and trying to get better myself

Link to post
Share on other sites

That ‘adviser’ is paid to do a job, that job is to do what is required to help claimants as best they can, not comment publicly on their intelligence or lack of it. If she finds the job such a burden she should quit and look for another job. Perhaps become one of the idiots and spend her time lazing on these sunny afternoons on the beach.

 

In my view the remark is nasty, as was the other one. If anyone capable of making such nasty comments has any authority at all over the objects of their bile then rest assured they will also be vindictive.

 

I’m sure that I would not knowingly tolerate an adviser referring to anyone in such a way, especially if they most probably included me as one of the ‘idiots’ they feel they need a break from.

 

No, I say in this battle anything goes, take no prisoners, get her struck off. They don’t, as a rule, allow the spark of human kindness, common decency or even the law in some cases, get in their way.

 

There could very well be a number of her victims eternally in your debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she finds the job such a burden she should quit and look for another job.

 

Indeed - When the previous programme (Flexible New Deal) was shut down early, I suggested that the "advisers" started to look for alternative employment. Pointed out that they were unlikely to remain employed and TUPE was not going to be an option open to them. I'll not repeat the response :razz:

Suffice to say, the office manager jumped ship within a few weeks and left the remaining staff to struggle on.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mat

I do see where you are coming from . I had a similar situation one where someone in authority made some ignorant homophobic comments. Now ths guy was otherwise a genuinely good person so I arranged for a general word to be had and not to make it official.

 

You must do what you feel is right , maybe a lighthearted comment about being able to see her FB comments , if she doesn't take the hint that is her problem

I do not believe that the job she does is fun and it must at times try the patience of a saint . You are of course now no longer on her radar so maybe a bit of compassion on your part is what s needed. You will of course be able to look down on her from the moral highground :lol:

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would do nothing yet, but i would keep it on the back burner. From my short time on JSA & signing on i have seen enough to know i would`t trust the system or the " advisers " one wee bit . If & when you need to " use " the screenshots is the only time they would see the light of day. I would also check her FB page to gather more evidence. If they had anything on you or could trip you up & sanction you, i don`t think they / she would hesitate or give a second thought about your circumstances or there impact. I would not give her any idea that she is being more foolish than the claimants she claims are idiots.

 

IMHO, think of it as a kind of insurance policy / mess with me & i will destroy you . Unsavory & dirty as it is , this is a battle & self preservation is your priority. She is dealing you some very good cards , play them wisely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would do nothing yet, but i would keep it on the back burner. From my short time on JSA & signing on i have seen enough to know i would`t trust the system or the " advisers " one wee bit . If & when you need to " use " the screenshots is the only time they would see the light of day. I would also check her FB page to gather more evidence. If they had anything on you or could trip you up & sanction you, i don`t think they / she would hesitate or give a second thought about your circumstances or there impact. I would not give her any idea that she is being more foolish than the claimants she claims are idiots.

 

IMHO, think of it as a kind of insurance policy / mess with me & i will destroy you . Unsavory & dirty as it is , this is a battle & self preservation is your priority. She is dealing you some very good cards , play them wisely.

 

I totally agree and that is the action I am taking - it is being used as insurance rather than maliciously should I ever need to used them in the future.. In fact the more evidence that is built up the better the impact, again, should I need to use it

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend who attends an office has been invited by letter to an apprentice open day, what happens on these? Will it be busy? My friend said he over heard his advisor talking of the prospect of 'hot men' on this open day with her friend. I can't believe that, id fume

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your friend is not sure what will happen why not ask the advisor, is there a reason why being busy is a problem?

Is you friend on ESA ore JSA

 

Have you got an issue with their being "Hot Men" there?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your friend is not sure what will happen why not ask the advisor, is there a reason why being busy is a problem?

Is you friend on ESA ore JSA

 

Have you got an issue with their being "Hot Men" there?

 

He doesn't like her, said she's snobby, and no why would I? He said he overheard her and was baffled at it:/ he's on JSA

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't like her, said she's snobby, and no why would I? He said he overheard her and was baffled at it:/ he's on JSA

 

If the adviser is a woman, it's not entirely surprising that she might be interested in the idea of "hot men". She should probably know enough not to say so in earshot of clients, I guess, but this sounds more like careless stupidity.

 

Still, maybe the WPP has organised a phoney apprentice session in order to get a bunch of sexy dudes in for the benefit of their female advisers. I'd bet against the idea, though.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't like her, said she's snobby, and no why would I? He said he overheard her and was baffled at it:/ he's on JSA

 

Well, based on the weather we've had over the last few weeks I reckon that there's quite likely going to be some hot men and hot women. He can check here: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/

 

Seriously though, it's two people having a conversation in work. They're not likely to want to discuss the likelihood of a peace deal being brokered in the middle east nor the merits of petrol vs diesel vehicles. They're just passing the time with each other in the exact same way that happens in every workplace.

My views are my own and are not representative of any organisation. if you've found my post helpful please click on the star below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone

I have to say that it is the sort of thing my advisor might say to me to try and get me there:lol: I would take it is the manner in which is was intended

 

My best guess is that they have got together some firms that are looking for apprentices so yes it might be busy , or they might have only invited people they think would suit the role

 

I am still confused as you said you would fume at the hot men comment

 

We can't all like everyone but "because she is snobby" maybe she just keeps a professional distance from her clients. I have always believed in being called by my first name but one job I had , some of the staff insisted on calling me Mr XXXXXX . Does that make me snobby?

  • Confused 1

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

He said he asked his advisor but she hasn't done one before, he just wants to know has anyone here been on one so he knows what to expect?

 

And by fuming I just meant the professionalism is bad at times, I don't disagree with it, I left the office I attended around a year ago and in my time their I got called a 'minger' by my so called advisor at the time, then the advisor she said it to smirked at me, didn't do anything about it although I wish I had:/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too right you should have complained. I complained today about the way they work with ESA claomants.

Thing is these guys arevtrying to build up relationships with local businesses. I think as well each office is only as good or bad as its manager.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is firms in the area are there to get some free summer slave labour. Cynical? Moi? (bet I am right though)

 

Same as at christmas, i was once offered a work boast (what a4e can it) at boots for the whole of december. i told them i wasn't being anyone's christmas month slave!

the advisor said ok, ill fix you up with something else in january. he never did and no more was ever said about it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...