Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nasty Neighbour is debt collector and came round for debt to LTSB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

I have a neighbour who has moved in since 2005 an has been harassing the whole area re parking and other things,and then he got a job as debt collector 2yrs ago , 1yr ago he was verbally warned by the police to stay away from me and my family yet on monday he visited my house infomd me he was working for LTSB and that we owed them £1,200 and he wanted payment I told him that iwas unable to make paymnt as I was on benefits' he said so you wont pay' then' he said it will give me great pleasure to come back with warrant of execution to sieze your goods ' and left.

I have contacted the police i als rang LTSB who said they passed th debt on to robinson way I rang them ttold them they didnt say much then the police rang them and they took a bit more notice and siad we will put a another agent on the case.

Want to know what else i can do ? can they come round with this warrant without Ltsb taking me to court as this has not happend.

 

Please Help:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't do anything without taking you to court. This person is bang out of order and breaking the OFT guidelines for debt collectors which is linked here. http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

I'm moving your thread to the DCA forum where hopefully you'll get some good advice.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drop the letter into his letterbox, the one that withdraws his right to visit your property.

 

I wonder if there is an option to complain to the local court that someone is "masquerading" as a Bailiff?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't come back with any sort of warrant. To get a warrant it must first go to court and a judgement obtained against you. You then will have 28 days to pay and if you don't, and only then, can they apply for a warrant and they must be a registered bailiff to come to your door. You still don't have to pay them as you don't have to let them in and they cannot break in, they can, however, enter through an open window.

 

Have you made an arrangement with LTSB ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two threads merged.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree totally with the sentiment of the above, I doubt in reality it will get you anywhere. The OFT complaint is worth pursuing, and it may be worth putting a letter in his letterbox forbidding him from tort of trespass on your land, though this might just antagonise him further. The ICO are unlikely to do anything. Make sure with the OFT that everything is phrased in general terms rather than personal terms, otherwise all you will get is a response saying they don't get involved in individual cases.

 

My revenge would be to keep a very close eye on what he does, and complain to whoever I could, whenever I could to make his life hell. With a bit of luck he might move then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always use standing orders as you are in control that way and they can't help themselves to more than you intend to pay. If you have any DD's now I strongly urge you to cancel them.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them you will pay in pounds

 

 

That would be 1b's (Imperial measure of weight - for those who may not know) of dog poo and youll post through the neighbours letterbox :lol:

 

But don't really do that will you

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

LTSB are ultimately responsible for the conduct of their representatives.

I would write a very strongly worded letter headed "FORMAL COMPLAINT" direct to LTSB, detailing this persons behaviour.Name him.Emphasise the distress this personal harrassment has caused. Tell them in future you will only deal with this matter in writing and that under no circumstances will you discuss it on the doorstep or by telephone.Conclude by informing them that you will be making a complaint to the Office of Fair Trading, The British Banking Association and The Credit Services Association. Use the info in the attachments below to quote the transgressions under OFT Debt Collection Guidelines and CSA guidelines. Request a copy of their complaints procedure. CC the letter to Robbers Way.

I also attach a copy of the CSA complaints form.

 

kind regards,

 

Elsa x

oft-debt-collection-guidelines.pdf

CSA-debt-collection guidance.pdf

CSA-complaint-form.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always get your local MP onto the person, sounds like he needs a good kick up the backside, I think these 'doorstep collectors' should be charged with living off immoral earnings, as should bailiffs who overcharge....

 

Why not report them to the Inland Revenue suggesting they are avoiding paying tax....

Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think he's avoiding paying tax SG? I don't think that will serve any useful purpose, although I agree that it might be worth contacting your MP, who I'm sure will have a website so you can find where to email.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if he works for robbers way, they are a dca and haveno legal powers to do anything to you.

 

it would be really nice to get him on tape/film stating he can comeback with a warrant on a civil debt!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...