Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

There is a god, 1st Credit gets a SERIOUS slap from OFT - Re Stat Demands etc


Curlyben
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My reaction to the twit on the phone who said they would bankrupt me and I would be out of work was funny, I did point out that if I was bankrupt and unable to find employment how did they expect to get funds from me should they be deemed owing... the twit put the phone down at that point.

 

I also had one who was going to 'fast track me to a bailiff' to which I replied 'Not without a court order you can't.' They told me 'there were ways they could do this... and I asked if I could record the call from that point onwards - to be greeted by silence and a dead line.

 

Hopefully now the OFT are beginning to realise what we have been dealt with over the last couple of years by these people and make them 'toe the line'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hopefully now the OFT are beginning to realise what we have been dealt with over the last couple of years by these people and make them 'toe the line'.

 

To be honest, until they were given more powers under the 06 cca then I don't think that there was that much they could do then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to Richard Spud's useful post above, other public information worth checking is:

 

ICO - has the DCA registered all trading names for data protection?

 

Companies House - has the DCA complied with the Companies Act 2006? Limited companies have to show their registered number, place of registration and registered office (which cannot be a PO Box) address on all stationery and websites.

 

OFT - do the registered office details match those provided to Companies House? A remarkable number don't.

 

Note that any CSA member company in breach of the Companies Act 2006 is also in breach of the CSA Code of Practice (which requires them to operate lawfully), and thus automatically trading unfairly as defined by CPUTR - failing to comply with a code of conduct to which a trader has subscribed.

 

I have spoken to the CSA about this, mentioning several companies, and received an expectedly wooly response. Then again, I don't take the CSA seriously. However, it seems to me that if such facts are reported to them, and they fail to act, then they damage what little credibility they have even more, and add weight to any further complaint made to OFT or the Registrar of Companies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many £50,000 fines will make them tow the line :confused:

 

OK..........Give up, "How many £50,000 fines.............":D:D

 

As importantly, how will the OFT rquirements hit their income. The OFT have been pretty explicit in their requirements, so it's hard to see even them backsliding on this one.

 

1st seem to have built their business on threats of court action, (even more than the average DCA) and dishing out SD's almost in the first instance. I think they are going to suffer a big drop in income, certainly in the short term anyway.

 

That should take the smirk off their faces!!!

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgepoint wanted to sell them last year, but didn't get a good enough offer.

here

Meanwhile 1st Credit's site is down (again) and neither the CSA or DSBG have reported the news on their web site. Yet.:cool:

Perhaps we'll all be dazzled by their explanation tomorrow.:rolleyes:

It's a tricky thing to 'turn around' and give a positive spin to. No doubt they'll try, but I'd say they're being rumbled at last.

Remember the CSA's 'Debt Manifesto' last year. What tosh.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many £50,000 fines will make them tow the line :confused:

 

Hi babybear39

 

50k is like a grain of salt in an ocean, their profit margins are huge! as you would expect when they pay only a few pence in the pound for debts.

 

Now make the fine 500k and they may sit up and listen.

 

I wonder if Cabot maybe the next DCA to receive some guide lines from the OFT? live in hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to deal with harassing phone calls by debtors CSA Website

 

Well there's a turnaround:rolleyes:

 

I blame fuzzybobble :-)

 

I hope they've been paying attention, as I'll be testing them soon. :D

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi babybear39

 

50k is like a grain of salt in an ocean, their profit margins are huge! as you would expect when they pay only a few pence in the pound for debts.

 

Now make the fine 500k and they may sit up and listen.

 

I wonder if Cabot maybe the next DCA to receive some guide lines from the OFT? live in hope.

 

I have a funny feeling the spotlight is shining over West Yorkshire.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought on this.

 

In their directive to 1st Credit on the back page they list 9 reasons or situations why ist credit shouldn't issue a SD and a couple stand out

 

C/ A valid dispute remains unresolved

E/ Where CAB or another other advice organisations are involved....

 

I am sure most of these could be refered to with other DCAs that are attempting to issue a SD with a threat to report them to OFT should they not withdraw immediately as this is in breech of OFT guidlines....

 

I know its not........ but if they can quote Rankine!!

Live Life-Debt Free

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought on this.

 

In their directive to 1st Credit on the back page they list 9 reasons or situations why ist credit shouldn't issue a SD and a couple stand out

 

C/ A valid dispute remains unresolved

E/ Where CAB or another other advice organisations are involved....

 

Re CAB, after a shaky start it works for me so far.

 

I am sure most of these could be refered to with other DCAs that are attempting to issue a SD with a threat to report them to OFT should they not withdraw immediately as this is in breech of OFT guidlines....

 

I think this would be done automatically / unofficially if you know what I mean, certainly should be.

 

I know its not........ but if they can quote Rankine!! What a mistake this was, hope it gets sorted one day, its all I get from the CAB.[/quote]

 

Happy days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from hols and found this out today.

 

Fantastic news and I am so glad I wrote to my MP.

 

Also a big thankyou to the Sunday Times as they must have had an input.

 

Please write to your MP if you get a SD or any bother of 1st Credit.

This way we are one step closer to getting there credit license revoked!!!

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought on this.

 

I know its not........ but if they can quote Rankine!! What a mistake this was, hope it gets sorted one day, its all I get from the CAB.[/quote]

 

Happy days.

 

The Rankine matter could be a thing of the past before too long.

 

I can say no more, but you'll know when it happens. ;)

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could u give us a clue Please?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Rankine matter could be a thing of the past before too long.

 

I can say no more, but you'll know when it happens. ;)

 

 

Oh yes - that is news I will be happy to hear.

 

Let us all bless the Rankines for their contribution to our crusade:eek:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D I wonder if they are still living the high life?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were on the last programme i saw. They had a penthouse apartment and working whilest running there PAY TO USE website.

 

Oh well maybe they should not have attempted to be greedy.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I hope yo do not object writing to this thread. I am desparate and need help!!!

 

I do have a lot of problems dealing with 1st credit ltd and connaught. How do you deal with these guys??

 

You seem to know a lot about them.

Connaught seem to be heavy handed even though I have communicated with 1st Credit that I do not owe them any money. Even if you request cca to them and they default under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, they still keep on coming with legal threats.

 

Any ideas please.

 

Thank you

Tam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...