Jump to content

tamarindo

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

1 Follower

About tamarindo

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. "The SB clock starts ticking from the cause of action so for example on a credit card it may be over a month after the last payment was made ..." good to know that !!!
  2. "If there are any Authorities that you require please give me a shout." yes how to search for them or give me links , most helpful thanks , very much appreciated
  3. "if you do not have access to them I can provide links." yes please
  4. "if you do not have access to them I can provide links." yes please
  5. "creditor does have to be stated on the notice " DN only issue by the debt collector agents , they confirm it in writing, only address of agents present, no address from the original creditor and name of original creditor only referred by the same agents. I found this: The Defendant notes that the actual Creditors name and address does not appear on the Default notice and thus the Default notice is therefore invalid as per section 2 of the [Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices 1983)] which states:- (2). (1) Any notice to be given by a creditor or o
  6. because I know these collectors read post here so I better no give here , I believe they have been tracing me for no reason, even having a person spying on me outside my house once and when I found out they never came back !!! .. But the date is to do when the last payment was made to the account in less than 15 days , no written acknowledgement made after then, but the date of the last default notice issued was on july 2006 and there were 2 other DN issued before also January 2006 and September 2005, and as I said the wording was no according to the prescribed format and the DN was
  7. yes absolutely , that is why I am here , I value you help, it is only I am preparing for the worse, that is all , thank you for your help !!
  8. sure there other facts about my defense if needed !!, as ~I said the agreement is unenforceable, I may need your help. It is unenforceable because not pre-scribed terms and conditions anywhere in fact there is no reference on the original application form , why ?I said that? because copy of the original application , it is a marketing mailshot and but I do not know also it is a lottery in court!!! thanks
  9. nothing personal I hope , it is just a reference , just listening from various advices, your advice is also taken onboard, thanks anyway!! I just to have an open mind about this matter, thanks for your help !!!
  10. PT2537 DID SHOW ME various cases where the DN WAS INVALID AND CANNOT BE RE ISSUED IN COURT BECAUSE EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH AND COURT WILL NOT ALLOW IT, DEBT SOLD ON THE BACK OF INVALID DN IS , MAKES ILLEGAL NOTICE O F ASSIGMENT and illegal termination of contract ,, there are various cases in the site
  11. surely if the DN IS INVALID , that 's it , it is in the act how can they overrule that?? PT TOLD ME ONCE INVALID DN IS A DEFENSE IN ITSELF AND THE FACT THE THEY SOLD THE DEBT ON THE BACKOF AN INVALID DN , it will not stand the notice of assigment !! in court , it is illegal !!
×
×
  • Create New...