Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Man has heart attack after Baliff takes him to cash machine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm eagerly awaiting the next edition of Private Eye, I bet some of the quotes from this thread will be used in their 'From The Message Boards' feature.

 

I've already read posts that could be from Family_Man or Emily.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, a member of an MP's family, otherwise quite a few

bang on chriss

we campaigned for almost twenty years for a roundabout on one of our major cross roads....MPs daughter was killed on it six weeks later the round about was built

just goes to show huh

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps a copy of that ruling & judges comments should be sent to Jack Straw

straw does'nt give a #### and as for investigation he has only blurted out the comments to look good and get some publicity that he is working for the people , he knows he is on his way out and needs votes

nothing will happen they will close ranks and that will be it END OF

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I think too.

 

I believe the only thing that will change this bad law, is if people complain to the MP's and the party headquarters in sufficient numbers for the statisticians to see it as a significant issue.

 

I've seen collection figures when councils do a Bailiff Review, they're on the internet for some of them and they show (just as tomtubby said) that only about 1% of council tax is not collected each year.

 

Now I think we're all grown up enough to know that if any council really wants to, it can find a million quid out of a budget of 80 - 90 million for fact finding in nice sunny locations, and redecorating the town hall, or the mayors house, on top of the money they get from central government, or twinning with some village thousands of miles away where they wouldn't know how to pronounce Accrington in the Borough of Hyndburn, the bailiffs probably work for either the taliban or the serbian mafia, and they couldn't care less anyway.

 

1% isn't much for all the misery that's caused for vulnerable people and folk who've fallen on hard times through no fault or rashness of their own.

They've created an industry that actually takes money that should be paying the 1% arrears off, and instead lines the pockets of Equita, JBW, Marstons, Newlyns..........................and so on.

 

 

I love a good rant!:D

Edited by chris600uk
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago I got a DVLA penalty charge of £80 for neglecting to declare a car SORN.

 

A few weeks later I got a visit from four policemen who took me to the nearest cashpoint in their marked car. I didnt even get a receipt.

 

I was suprised at this to say the least, but accepted it for some reason, dont know why.

 

Im now going to FoI the police and get to the bottom of it.

 

The cops didnt actually arrest me, but they appeared to be acting as DVLA debt collectors rather than policemen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years ago I got a DVLA penalty charge of £80 for neglecting to declare a car SORN.

 

A few weeks later I got a visit from four policemen who took me to the nearest cashpoint in their marked car. I didnt even get a receipt.

 

I was suprised at this to say the least, but accepted it for some reason, dont know why.

 

Im now going to Freedom of Information Act the police and get to the bottom of it.

 

The cops didnt actually arrest me, but they appeared to be acting as DVLA debt collectors rather than policemen.

 

REALLY ????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youre right- no baliffs in NI,

 

There is a part of the courts system which does the enforcement bit.

 

Not the cops.

 

But hey, they have got a lot braver in the last few years...

 

Still, it took four of them, fully armed, in a bullet proof Mondeo for them to work up the courage to knock on my door and offer me a lift to Tesco!

 

Maybe I should gone out in a blaze of glory, strapping on my stirrup pump and locked myself under the stairs with a copy of the Radio Times shouting- "You'll never take me alive, copper!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Os, lets go with you a little way down that road and imagine that the bailiff popped round whistling as he walks up the path, and cheerily said,

 

B:Hi Mr Miller, just come for your fines money, rotten weather isn't it.

 

M says: Oh yes I've been waiting for you, look I've got to go to the cashpoint in the town centre, could you be so kind and wait.

 

B says: Why don't I give you a lift and save you the walk, it's awfully cold Mr M.

 

M: You are a kind lad, yes lets do that.

 

Now do tell...........

 

:D:DChris- thank you- you have made me laugh for the first time in a while-you have totally hit the nail on the head!!

 

Given my experience of Marstons (am not sure how to post a link to my original thread-basically, they broke my front door and knocked my baby daughter over in the process even though I was trying to pay) I m sure the above scenario is about as likely as a million flying pigs

 

This is a desparately sad scenario and my deepest sympathies go to the loved ones of this poor man. I pray that they ll get an enquiry, explanation and apology from Marstons and I hope that the individual involved has his conscience haunted for a long time (no doubt he/ she will justify it though-they always do-just doing my job blah blah:mad:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point is he wasn't doing his job Taking a debtor, particularly an elderly one, to an ATM is a strict no no & could lead to him losing his certificate & his company, who have habit of ignoring not only the law but common decency, could have their CCL removed by the OFT as not being fit

Link to post
Share on other sites

When will the government introduce strict codes of conduct for these people.

 

They think they can do as they please because they are bailiffs.

 

This story makes me feel sick to the pit of my stomach. I hope this bailiff and

the firm involved face serious charges for this and are dealt with firmly by a court of law.

 

I am no legal expert but doesn't this look like manslaughter?

Edited by shezboy
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread already ongoing about this-will merge yours with that.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an ongoing enquiry which is going to be sent to Jack Straw and our firm have also written a letter to him concerning the huge number of complaints that we know of concerning the enforcement of these Magistrate Court Fines.

 

There is a lot more behind this case that I do know of and this will of course come out shortly, but in the meantime it should be remembered that all bailiffs should be abiding by the guidelines laid down in the National Standards for Enforcement Agents which was published by the then Lord Chancellors Department in April 2002 and which has been endorsed by all bailiff companies. This guide makes very clear reference to persons who should be classified as "vulnerable" and personally it would appear that Mr Miller's case ticked 3, if not 4 of the boxes!!

 

The final point that should be made is this:

 

When enforcing a debt for an unpaid parking ticket or council tax, the bailiff MUST be a certificated bailiff. In holding a certificate it means that he has been before the court and satisfied a Judge that he is a "fit an proper" person to hold a certificate. In addition, a CRB check would have been carried out together with a credit reference search and a prior notification being made in a local newspaper.

 

For reasons that are still unclear, HMCS agreed that all bailiff's enforcing unpaid Magistrate Court Fines can be UNCERTIFICATED for ONE YEAR.

 

This is utter nonsense and should never have been allowed in the first place. In addition, if a bailiff is uncertificated, he would not have a Bailiff Bond and neither can a complaint be made to the court that certificated him. Therefore he can act in an unlawful mannner and then apply to be a certificated bailiff and there would be no record of a complaint.

 

In the case of Mr Miller, thankfully the bailiff is Certificated and therefore a complaint can indeed be made to the County Court that certificated him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack Straw may be a very nice bloke, and an able politician but I doubt that anything will affect the outcome of his enquiry - if my understanding of government process and typical behaviour is right, the outcome of the enquiry has already been decided and was most likely to have been agreed in a discussion in the cabinet office over a tiny glass of dry sherry - which probably took about ten minutes as soon as the news broke, it may even have been agreed over the phone.

 

The outcome of the new airport runway enquiry was probably agreed within 20 minutes, cos not everyone agreed to begin with and two glasses of sherry, you'll find it took place in about 1985.

 

One dead pensioner does not decide the outcome of an election, and is therefore very unimportant to politicians - no matter what the politicians say for the camera's, keeping the golden square mile happy matters much more.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...