Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MyHermes - My Hermes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We used a courier company called MyHermes to deliver 14 items which we had soldon ebay in November last year. The parcels included 4 items which, though not massively fragile were breakable - a ceramic basin, a vintage bakelite radio, some art deco wall lights and some ceramic door knobs. They were all wrapped well in several layers of bubblewrap and marked as “Fragile”.

 

We were subsequently informed by the buyers that all four were not just broken but smashed almost beyond recognition. I find it difficult to believe that such damage was not done maliciously.

 

As I began preparing claims for the broken items, I discovered that within the small print (which I doubt many people ever read), was a long list of items which were excluded from any claim for breakages. This included anything made of glass or ceramics. The small print also states that, no matter what the value of the item, MyHermes will only compensate you £25 unless you have bought special insurance.

 

I do not think it unreasonable to expect a courier company to make every effort to transport all items with care and without mishap, though one has to accept that occasionally accidents do happen.

 

For every item that was breakable to be broken is to my mind a demonstration of a company which has poor systems, is badly managed, and hires very poor operatives. A firm which should be avoided at all stakes. Incidentally there was one other item which was not delivered for more than 4 weeks!

 

I have had a number of conversations with MyHermes customer services and eventually I was offered £30 for the radio and a “good will gesture” for the other three items of £25. My total remaining losses amounted to at least £175, not to mention the time, inconvenience, stress and anger generated dealing with unhappy buyers.

 

You will note that the Ebay discussion board includes almost 500 postings about MyHermes, the vast majority of which are highly negative. There are 14 pages of complaints on moneysavingexpert.com and 70 bad reviews on Trust Pilot (score: 2.5/10).

 

I do feel that if the firm seems incapable of fulfilling even the most basic of expectations should be made (if nothing else) to warn customers when they book that fragile items are very unlikely to arrive in one piece.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think that we need to know more about the circumstances of this contract but I don't see that the merely inclusion of an exclusion clause in the contract necessarily allows them to escape all liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there seems to be a lot of complaints about this company around the internet, it would aslo be helpful for other people affected to let us know their stories on new thread in this sub-forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used MyHermes before. I would never waste my time with them again.

I think they use self employed people with vans who couldnt care less about the packages they carry.

 

You get what you pay for and in MyHermes case it's a poor careless service.

Always pay a little extra and get a reputable company to deal with. It's worth it in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are properly right in your assessment. However just because they might be cheaper than elsewhere doesn't mean that their customers have to put up with anything less than a reasonable service and proper standards.

 

I am very surprised that no one has so far join this thread from the eBay forum, where there are lots of complaints and also from Money-Saving Expert.

 

It would be very interesting to have some actual case studies on this forum to see what can be done. Looking over the Internet it seems to me that people are just giving up. I am quite certain that there is more than this which can be done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used MyHermes before. I would never waste my time with them again.

I think they use self employed people with vans who couldnt care less about the packages they carry.

 

You get what you pay for and in MyHermes case it's a poor careless service.

Always pay a little extra and get a reputable company to deal with. It's worth it in the long run.

 

 

Nothing wrong with self employed couriers. The problem with HERMES is that they use "lifestyle Couriers" Housewives in their cars without proper insurance or any business knowledge. And judging by their forum parcelforum.co.uk a lot of them dont really give a monkeys about your parcels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I started using My Hermes last October and up untill January they were very good I was recommending them to every one. Since January they have changed the courier that collects the parcels and he hasn't once turned up on the day he was booked to even though I wait in all day untill 10pm. This has been happening for 4 weeks now with numerous complaints calls from myself to the customer services dept it's still happening. The guy at customer services even rings the courier while I am holding on the phone and the courier promised to turn up at a certain time but never does and I am left waiting by the door for hours. The courier has also held on to my parcels for 8 days before handing them in to the depot. The customer service guy reported the courier to his manager as even he believed that the couriers actions were unacceptable yet he still does it and nothing is done. Today was the last straw, after last weeks complaints I agreed to give them one last chance and again today ... no courier has turned up again!. I rang this afternoon and they guy on the end called the courier on his mobile who said he would be here at 6pm. Waiting waiting waiting.. you guessed it, never showed. The lies this courier comes out with for not showing is unbelievable too. I'll be calling them again tomorrow for a refund then that's it, I'll never use them again. They are the worst

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest taking them to small claims court - use the posts by other unsatisfied customers as evidence and your things as well (pictures would be helpful) also good to report them to the Better Business Bureau

 

That's not evidence, that's hearsay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not evidence, that's hearsay.

 

Being hearsay does not mean that it is not evidence.

 

Furthermore, hearsay is admissible in civil matters - S.1 Civil Evidence Act 1995

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi, I have used all of the courier services available as I sell over 100 items per month on eBay

so tried them all. I have found My Hermes slow but good. The self employed man who collects from me always phones me in the morning to tell me what time he is going to turn up and has given me his telephone number so I can contact him if there is a problem. However, because they are slow (normally 5 days) and I do not really want breakables in the post system too long I tend only to use My Hermes for larger non-breakable items.

 

Regarding breakables, no one will insure them for damage in the system!

 

I have had breakages occur by Royal Mail , DHL, and UPS. I have seen Royal Mail drop my parcel onto the floor when loading into the back of the van. I have seen the UPS driver throw my parcel into the back on his van and DHL somehow managed to break in half a boxed steel golf club.

 

I always double box all fragile times, but that still does not protect from them really bad handling. I do get most upset about this, but there does not appear to be anything I can do about it. When I complain to ANY of the courier companies I am told that I did not pack well enough and that such items are not insured. I have also been told that the reason why glass and china is not covered is because it is possible for the item to be broken before packing.

 

If anyone knows of any courier that will insure China and Glass please let me know as they would get my business full time....however as I know of no such courier I must consider that breakages is just part of my business risks and the cost I charge for items need to reflect any losses I may occasionally make. To minimise this risk I use 1-2 days delivery services, as I think that the less time the parcels is in the couriers hands the better.

 

My experience however does not point to any of them being better than another in regards to looking after my parcels well, and all of them know they have opt out clauses within there terms and conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Aaaargh. I'd never heard of this outfit before last week. I ordered a Playstation 3 from Amazon last week and Hermes UK were the courier company - well it never arrived here. Furthermore it's listed on their tracking site as "delivered to secure location" - well wherever that is, it certainly wasn't here. The trouble is Amazon now say since it's listed as "delivered" they think thats that, job done - and now I'm £189 out of pocket with nothing to show for it - to be honest I'm shocked Amazon would use such a company. It's made me think twice about ordering anything from Amazon again.

 

If you're looking for further complaints about Hermes theres a lengthy one on the Amazon discussions board, not that they take any notice of it. Shocking company. Theres also a clip on YouTube of the BBC Newsnight investigation into the company that aired on dec 3rd last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hermes delivered to my elderly neighbour who is housebound and can't get to the door - and on the card said the parcel was in the "Recycling Bin" - very helpful as it was the day before recycling day and that was then promptly collected!! What kind of idiot thinks the recycling bin, (where by definition the contents are thrown away) is a safe place? .. anyway... Dorothy doesn't know who the parcel was from as she orders quite a bit of stuff and gets various free gifts from charities etc - all Hermes automated reply will say is "contact the retailer" - But I can't - I don't know who it is. They must have the sender of this parcel in their system - surely. I have the card with a code on it. Does anyone know how to contact a real person at Hermes - it's driving me crazy and worrying poor old Dorothy. Thanks -yours frustrated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hermes delivered to my elderly neighbour who is housebound and can't get to the door - and on the card said the parcel was in the "Recycling Bin" - very helpful as it was the day before recycling day and that was then promptly collected!! What kind of idiot thinks the recycling bin, (where by definition the contents are thrown away) is a safe place? .. anyway... Dorothy doesn't know who the parcel was from as she orders quite a bit of stuff and gets various free gifts from charities etc - all Hermes automated reply will say is "contact the retailer" - But I can't - I don't know who it is. They must have the sender of this parcel in their system - surely. I have the card with a code on it. Does anyone know how to contact a real person at Hermes - it's driving me crazy and worrying poor old Dorothy. Thanks -yours frustrated.

 

Hello Appletree38, We're very sorry to hear about this. I hope yourself and Dorothy accept our apologies for the trouble caused. You can email rosie @ myhermes.co.uk with your query. This is a dedicated complaints email address. Somebody will get back to you as soon as possible. Include as many details as you can in the email. Very sorry again for this. Rosie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
aaaargh. I'd never heard of this outfit before last week. I ordered a playstation 3 from amazon last week and hermes uk were the courier company - well it never arrived here. Furthermore it's listed on their tracking site as "delivered to secure location" - well wherever that is, it certainly wasn't here. The trouble is amazon now say since it's listed as "delivered" they think thats that, job done - and now i'm £189 out of pocket with nothing to show for it - to be honest i'm shocked amazon would use such a company. It's made me think twice about ordering anything from amazon again.

 

If you're looking for further complaints about hermes theres a lengthy one on the amazon discussions board, not that they take any notice of it. Shocking company. Theres also a clip on youtube of the bbc newsnight investigation into the company that aired on dec 3rd last year.

 

do not use hermes.

I have had a parcel damaged to the point of destruction.

Hermes say their rules state ' no compensation for damage to computers'.

Their list of items where they do not pay compensation is very long and

includes almost all items that are breakable.

Use parcelforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boots used them to deliver some good that i ordered for my kids xmas, the parcels were due on a Wednesday, Wednesday comes and nothing so i ring to get told that the driver couldn't find my house so would be out for delivery again (at the time we lived by a school) Thursday nothing ring to get told again couldn't find address so i tell them instructions to ring my mobile which they should have done but never did and i will guide driver Friday and it 8.30pm i check on-line status to be told delivered and left on porch i was livid i had stayed in all day but the best bit is i don't have a porch and no parcels were left outside and in special instructions it clearly stated do not leave outside of property or with neighbours.

 

I ring boots to get hold of them i had enough by this time i was in floods of tears as they were gone, boots told me to ring them and find out what going on, I did this to be told im sorry there is nothing we can do i told them to get hold of the driver and tell him to deliver the goods to my house they told me that they had no contact with the drivers i told them they were lying as they had to in case of problems and at 10pm the goods came opened and battered!!! i was livid ive lost all trust in them and boots as when i rang to ask what to do they said as it left there warehouse in good condition it was down to Hermes to sort it. I have tried on several occasions to sort it but nothing in the end i had to re-buy some of the goods

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boots used them to deliver some good that i ordered for my kids xmas, the parcels were due on a Wednesday, Wednesday comes and nothing so i ring to get told that the driver couldn't find my house so would be out for delivery again (at the time we lived by a school) Thursday nothing ring to get told again couldn't find address so i tell them instructions to ring my mobile which they should have done but never did and i will guide driver Friday and it 8.30pm i check on-line status to be told delivered and left on porch i was livid i had stayed in all day but the best bit is i don't have a porch and no parcels were left outside and in special instructions it clearly stated do not leave outside of property or with neighbours.

 

I ring boots to get hold of them i had enough by this time i was in floods of tears as they were gone, boots told me to ring them and find out what going on, I did this to be told im sorry there is nothing we can do i told them to get hold of the driver and tell him to deliver the goods to my house they told me that they had no contact with the drivers i told them they were lying as they had to in case of problems and at 10pm the goods came opened and battered!!! i was livid ive lost all trust in them and boots as when i rang to ask what to do they said as it left there warehouse in good condition it was down to Hermes to sort it. I have tried on several occasions to sort it but nothing in the end i had to re-buy some of the goods

 

 

I have told Boots, Landsend, Amazon, Debenhams and Marks & Spencer that I will not accept any parcels they send to me if Hermes are the delivery agents.

Hopefully if enough people do this it will have the desired effect to stop this bad service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have tried to use my hermes to make a delivery. Collection was arranged and no one turned up, a new date was given and again no one turned up, so cancelled order with them and went back to DHL, a lot dearer with insurance but they seem reliable from past experience..I had a return to send back to Jacamo and they arranged collection by my hermes . That time they collected parcel and took 3 weeks to deliver it, had to make a claim to sort it out.the point of this is just to let anyone be aware of the poor service from my hermes so that they can avoid them.

Edited by graham p d
type error
Link to post
Share on other sites

I ordered an item off eBay and waited patiently to receive it.

 

Yesterday a Hermes failed delivery card was found on the front doormat with my surname and "Thurs" scrawled across it.

Nobody had rung my doorbell.

 

I contacted the seller and confirmed that they were using Hermes and they gave me a tracking number.

 

Hermes tracking service log revealed that this had been the second failed attempt, the first apparently on the previous day.

There was no failed delivery card nor did anybody ring my doorbell on that day.

 

I reported these events to Hermes who advised me to contact the seller to discuss the issue with them (which I did) and that the seller should raise the issue with Hermes as they were unable, for contractual reasons, to discuss the issue with me.

 

Now, today (Thursday) I find another card on my mat claiming that this was the second attempt.

My doorbell did not ring and the Hermes log no longer shows the original phantom attempted delivery.

 

The seller has been most helpful in providing details of my experience to Hermes and I am currently waiting to see if a third delivery will be attempted tomorrow (Friday).

 

 

My online research reveals that this company, in its present and previous incarnations, uses "self-employed" deliverers who are paid a pittance per item that is successfully delivered.

I had previously suspected that they were paid on a per-call basis and that they were boosting their pay with fake failed deliveries.

 

My current suspicion is that their deliverers are being required to deliver more parcels than their vehicle's capacity and/or that parking problems are a major nightmare for them and that our local courier does not have the wit to find a doorbell.

 

My advice to users of eBay and other online services is to avoid using the default "Other Courier" option for delivery and pay the little extra for the more reliable Royal Mail option (unless, of course, you don't mind being frustrated by such issues).

Edited by Freegan
Link to post
Share on other sites

We are receiving so many complaints about this company that I think that someone - or maybe a group of people should start getting together to bring a small claim s action.

 

You don't need to be involved in the contract to do this.

 

See Contracts (Rights of Thirds Parties) Act 1999 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents which would allow the recipients of deliveries made through Hermes to sue Hermes directly for breach of contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the latest on my Hermes fiasco.

 

This morning my doorbell rang at around 10:15.

On answering it I found that it was the Royal Mail postman and that there was a Hermes card in my letterbox.

 

After receiving my post I examined Hermes' card and found that it had my surname and "Hairdressers" scrawled on it, so I went into the hairdressers' shop that shares the same address as mine and collected my parcel, finding that it bore a Geopost label, presumably affixed by the seller's staff, and that it also bore a large print label reading "PACKAGES MUST BE SIGNED FOR AND NEVER LEFT SAFE".

I checked with the hairdresser and he confirmed that he had, indeed, signed for it. ( I had expected that the signatory should have been the addressee.)

 

On checking the Hermes tracking log I found that it had been registered as signed for at 09:41 with the note "Signature from Household".

The shop is not part of, nor the shopkeeper a member of, my household.

 

I was within earshot of my doorbell until it rang at 10:15 and summoned me downstairs.

 

The fact that my local Royal Mail postman had the wit to ring my bell throws into question the standards of intelligence that Hermes set when recruiting their couriers.

Edited by Freegan
more information
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Please accept my sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused and we do empathise with your situation however we need to reiterate the policy in relation to excluded items and parcel compensation. The myHermes website clearly states what items are deemed to be excluded and you are prompted to review our excluded list before purchasing our service. By agreeing to our terms and conditions, which you have accepted by virtue of using our service, and which are part of the legal contract between you and us make it clear that, “We will not be liable to you nor pay you any compensation for damage in relation to any goods that are excluded from compensation for damage”. As a gesture of goodwill we have refunded your postage back into your account. Once again please accept our apologies. Rosie myHermes

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there seems to be a lot of complaints about this company around the internet, it would aslo be helpful for other people affected to let us know their stories on new thread in this sub-forum

 

I first used MyHermes last year. I posted a bottle of malt whisky to someone and tracked it on a very rudimentary system on their web site. For a number of days it never left the hub. I enquired why it appeared to be stuck in the central hub and after some time and a number of contradictory messages I was told it had been broken and since it was glass it was excluded from compensation so (basically) 'tough'.

 

I requested to see the package as I suspected that it was an item likely to have been pilfered (a round heavy tube obviously containing liquid!). After a couple of days pressure to see some evidence I was finally told that they could not produce any because due to health and safety reasons the glass had to be cleared away. As with everyone else I've read of who shipped 'excluded items', I naturally got nowhere with a compensation claim (though their cutomer service first thought it was liquids that were excluded, before becomming glass).

 

So I informed the buyer and sent him a replacement at my own expense this time via the post office who quite happily accepted and insurred glass and liquids. This package arrived the very next day. Three weeks later the buyer sent me a message to say a totally smashed bottle of whisky in a sodden package had arrived at his house. Now you can make you own assessment as to what might have occurred but I was obviously fed a total load of rubbish from customer servive.

 

It is possible that the package was stolen but because I was creating such a stink to see evidence someone decided it best to put it back in the system (broken) without knowing I had already been told it had been cleared away - all VERY fishy.A year on, the memory of this had faded and in an effort to reduce shipping cost on ebay I once again gave MyHermes my custom (more fool me).

 

Ten parcels in and so far so good! THEN I post a video recorder. It's survived 15 years use and three house moves unscathed. As a totally anal Engineer I double boxed the item and packed the box solid with bubble wrap. In the box the video was a good three inches clear of any side but packed tight. Even so the video arrived with the case dented. The ONLY way that could have happened is if the box was dropped from a (great) height or thrown and dropped. I have just applied for a claim form. They were VERY interested to know exactly I had posted. Probably to see if they could claim an exclusion.

 

I'll let you know how it progresses.

 

MyHermes really need to be taken to task over their shoddy handling.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...