Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - Tily Carpentry Yate Bristol ***Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 977 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

where.. cause it ideally needs removing...but of course thats why we ask everyone to always post defences here before submitting ....just in-case there are silly mistakes made..which i must sadly say are a re-occurring theme in most of your threads in oneway or another.

 

even though its stated he denied parking there... the options of the OR statement give the impression the defendant doesn't really know..always better never to dangle carrots in a defence.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree looks very amateurish and indecisive so a lesson learnt for the future. The wife is going over to the car park today to take photos because in their POC they claim he parked in Tilys Carpentry Car park but on the PCN they claim he parked in Grooms House Car Park. I just want to see if CEL look after Tilys car park too according to Google map they don't but need to check.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well good photos of the perspective that a driver see before entering 

position of all signs and their small text too if not already here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My hunch was right Tilys Carpentry is not monitored by CEL they have a picket fence around their car park with a generic "No Unauthorised Parking" sign nailed to it.

So the parking offence was committed on a site that CEL have no jurisdiction even though their POC claims to have.

The Grooms House signage by CEL is now off the floor and stands about six foot high to the right of the car park which is now clearly visible .

 

 

Tilys Car Park 2.pdf

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no it says 'no unauthorised predestrians'

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to sum up the car park situation.

 

In their PCN the fleecers state your son parked in Grooms House car park, which is correct.

 

But in the POC they quote Tily Carpentry car park.

 

What a bunch of idiots!

 

This will be a laugh when it comes to WS stage, your son can just state he has never parked in Tily Carpentry car park in his life, and indeed the fleecers own photos show the car in a completely different car park.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful of a simple naming error ...dont assume anything.

 

Read it as 'this car park' 

D entered and exited an anpr system ..there is evidence of that.

 

oh and those signs..look at the word spacing can't be parking not enough letters.

 

its a std risk assessment sign to protect the public from potential danger. Nothing to do with cel at all ....

 

Dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help if it was possible to read the signage at the entrance and the signs inside the carpark. Just about the only thing I can read is "Important Message" but I have no idea what the message is.

 

I do see see a sign that says  Permit Holders Only. But I cannot read the sign beneath it. If the car did not have a permit then the driver was trespassing which only the landowner can pursue not CEL. 

 

Is it possible to get photos of the signs that we can read please. The signs at the entrance, their terms and Conditions and whether there are different T&Cs within the carpark.

 

The font size seems too small on the notices that can be seen, but the small font sizes does  make a contract with drivers difficult to claim.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

no to mediation

1 wit him

 

3 copies

i court

1 the fleecers solicitor (omit/email/sig)

1 for you.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be any signs for Grooms house but the others appear to require permits to park there.

If you are 100% sure that the parking was at grooms house then providing you are also 100% sure that CEL does not cover that area then you are fine.

 

However the car shown on the PCN was driving past the sign that said CEL had parking rights there and gave 20 minutes allowance to stay without a permit.  The time stayed on the PCN was about 37 minutes , from memory.

 

What we have not seen is the car park sign at the entrance to any car park and do you have to go through CEL areas to get to Grooms House car park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the offence took place last January 2020 and the signs have since changed, the PCN to Grooms House shows a little sign barely readable if you're driving but now the sign is treble the size, obviously they must have conceded a few cases for the change?.

 

When I took the recent photos there are no signs to the entrance of the main car park its not until you are actually in then you are hit with signs of all shapes and sizes.

 

I think the time stayed was 27 minutes.

 

their POC claims it was Tileys Carpentry Car Park but the PCN states it was Grooms House

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't answer any of my questions.😅

 

Do you have to drive through any CEL areas to get to Grooms House.

Are there any signs for Grooms house-parking or permits

How many times are quoted on the PCN

what are the times [if any] on all the photographs of the car

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

googleearth is interesting..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have to drive through any CEL areas to get to Grooms House? Yes you have to drive through a car park for the pub which is plastered with signs for CEL

 

Are there any signs for Grooms house-parking or permits? Yes there are see Post #62 Photo 3 sign at the entrance to Grooms House which is parking for the Bird Cage cake shop

 

How many times are quoted on the PCN? please see attached

 

what are the times [if any] on all the photographs of the car? Entered 1429hrs left 1457hrs

 

thank you

15-01-2020a.pdf

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

open

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - Tily Carpentry Yate Bristol ***Discontinued***

Excellent, they didn't want to risk a bashing in court.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...