Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and My Various Benefit Claims and issues


Jmulv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure when I will se my advisor next, no appointments booked so just wait for a letter saying when to see her, keep my head down and keep applying and hopefully will stay on normal fortnightly sign ons for a while

 

 

not sure if I missed the new scheme, I read that at the moment it is only for people leaving the WP after april (I left in march)

 

 

job search not bad at the moment, quiet over weekend but have applied for 7 so far this week (couple of responses back)

 

 

how did your sign on go?

where they happy with everything in your work book?

yes they leave u alone if you finished wp before April and you just carry on with post work programme support but i have just read the guidelines on the gov website and it says candidates finishing work prog before april carry on with post work program support but after week 26 of post work program support your advisor can review your case and make a decision along with the manager weather or not to place you onto the new Help to Work Scheme

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 695
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for that

 

 

Gives me about another 3 months to go, I would like to think I could get a job before then, but with applications either being ignored or just getting rejection letters I am not too hopeful

Im on week 31 of post work program support so it just a matter of time for me before they mandate me to that scheme - is anybody here actualy on the Help to work scheme?

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been on the PWP since September last year, so that makes it about 36 weeks for me. So far I've been lucky in mainly only seeing decent, sensible advisers who can see that there's no point at all in sending me on worthless schemes which won't improve my employability in the slightest.

 

If the decision to mandate to Help To Work is purely a discretionary one by the adviser hopefully I won't ever have to go on it, but I'm not holding my breath. I'll certainly argue like hell if I'm ever put on the scheme but of course if it becomes compulsory after a set period then there's nothing I can do about it.

 

Anyone who is still on PWP, my advice would be to really show them you're doing all you can to find work and it might stop them putting you on HTW..if only for a while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im on week 31 of post work program support so it just a matter of time for me before they mandate me to that scheme - is anybody here actualy on the Help to work scheme?

 

i will be put on the help to work scheme from the 20th of june as my adviser told me last month when u see me back on the 20th of june we will then decided what is best for u either daily sign on or a voluntary work but i can be sure i will be on the voluntary work scheme plus i cant see many adviser at the jcp actually wanting to sign u on daily am sure they will be wanting u out working do u not think?

 

as they wont cope with daily sign ons so to me its a waste even putting daily sign ons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

 

 

Gives me about another 3 months to go, I would like to think I could get a job before then, but with applications either being ignored or just getting rejection letters I am not too hopeful

 

 

am sure u will get a job soon just keep going keep trying like am doing i had a interview today if i get it it will be bye bye job centre and hello to 40hours work.

 

hows your jobsearch been going when last time u got an interview?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished pwps in December 2013 and was put back on jsa 25+ with normal 2 week signing

 

does anyone know if i will be put on htw or put back on wp in december 2014

 

have to see advisor next week for first time in about three months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished pwps in December 2013 and was put back on jsa 25+ with normal 2 week signing

 

does anyone know if i will be put on htw or put back on wp in december 2014

 

have to see advisor next week for first time in about three months

well thats the first time ive heard of sombody going from post work programme back to normal fortnightly signing on - Lucky You !

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finished pwps in December 2013 and was put back on jsa 25+ with normal 2 week signing

 

does anyone know if i will be put on htw or put back on wp in december 2014

 

have to see advisor next week for first time in about three months

 

I don't think even the DWP or JC know what's happening - or when it's happening - or if it's happening! Keep your head down and you might get left alone, at least for the foreseeable future. I'm hoping for the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think even the DWP or JC know what's happening - or when it's happening - or if it's happening! Keep your head down and you might get left alone, at least for the foreseeable future. I'm hoping for the same.
and me i just wish there was more full time job in my area also ones that dont involve commision based wages coz there loads of them advertised each week round my area

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. Employers now only want people when they want them; the days of the 'normal' permanent job are fading rapidly. When they started calling us 'Human Resources' instead of 'Staff' or 'Personnel' that was the beginning of the rot.

 

For myself, I'm sick of seeing vacancies which involve 15-20 seperate 'jobs' and for which they're only paying minimum wage. Most jobs usually involve doing more than was in the agreement and we all accept that, but what they expect from you now is just ridiculous.

 

Saw an admin job a while ago in which you were basically the only one left in the office during the day and had to run the place, sort out any problems, deal with customers, etc. I've done this kind of thing before and the correct title of the job should be 'Office Manager' - you're the only one there so you're effectively managing the office, right? - yet they had it advertised as only 'Admin Assistant' and for minimum wage.

 

I had an urge to email them and ask 'Pardon me, but if I'm the only one there all day, exactly who am I 'assisting'..myself?'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. Employers now only want people when they want them; the days of the 'normal' permanent job are fading rapidly. When they started calling us 'Human Resources' instead of 'Staff' or 'Personnel' that was the beginning of the rot.

 

For myself, I'm sick of seeing vacancies which involve 15-20 seperate 'jobs' and for which they're only paying minimum wage. Most jobs usually involve doing more than was in the agreement and we all accept that, but what they expect from you now is just ridiculous.

 

Saw an admin job a while ago in which you were basically the only one left in the office during the day and had to run the place, sort out any problems, deal with customers, etc. I've done this kind of thing before and the correct title of the job should be 'Office Manager' - you're the only one there so you're effectively managing the office, right? - yet they had it advertised as only 'Admin Assistant' and for minimum wage.

 

I had an urge to email them and ask 'Pardon me, but if I'm the only one there all day, exactly who am I 'assisting'..myself?'.

 

This is the problem, there are no REAL PERMANENT jobs any more and if there are they are filled internally or by people already volunteering at the place at minimum wage. The JCP/WP seem to think we WANT to be unemployed and going through hell and being treated like idiots - the majority of the unemployed WANT TO WORK but cannot do so on minimum wage at set hours less travel etc as it brings in LESS and we cannot survive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the problem, there are no REAL PERMANENT jobs any more and if there are they are filled internally or by people already volunteering at the place at minimum wage. The JCP/WP seem to think we WANT to be unemployed and going through hell and being treated like idiots - the majority of the unemployed WANT TO WORK but cannot do so on minimum wage at set hours less travel etc as it brings in LESS and we cannot survive.

They always claim even a p/t time job is better and have started giving the impression you won't lose out and should be happy you can still sign on and get JSA or whichever benefits you get

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the problem, there are no REAL PERMANENT jobs any more and if there are they are filled internally or by people already volunteering at the place at minimum wage. The JCP/WP seem to think we WANT to be unemployed and going through hell and being treated like idiots - the majority of the unemployed WANT TO WORK but cannot do so on minimum wage at set hours less travel etc as it brings in LESS and we cannot survive.

I rarely find a job thats over 36 hours a week every week thats not commission dependant an that arnt lookin for a list of qualifications as long as your arm

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like The help To Work Scheme hasnt started yet its set to start in the next 4 weeks as the companies who bid for the contract wernt told they would be given a contract by dwp until may and they wanted 6 weeks notice to start it up so your lookin it at things changing around 3rd or 4th week of june or even 1st week of july so keep your eyes peeled and your ears to the ground when visiting your jobcentre over the next month G4S, Learndirect and Seetec are 3 of the 6 companies to get the Help to work contract

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is old news (article dated yesterday)

 

 

345 organisations not going to take part in community placements

 

 

http://welfarenewsservice.com/workfare-scheme-holed-waterline-says-unite/

Yes they are mainly charities that want to keep voluntary work to volunteer's but 6 companies have since been given the "Help to Work" contract and 3 of them are G4S, Learn Direct and Seetec the other 3 want to remain anonymous so the dnt face a public back lash

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Community Work Placement suppliers

 

Contract package area Coverage Supplier

 

 

  1. East of England – Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire; Cambridge and Suffolk; Essex; Norfolk – Seetec
  2. East Midlands – Nottinghamshire; Derbyshire; Lincolnshire and Rutland; Leicestershire and Northamptonshire – G4S
  3. London West – Ealing; Hammersmith and Fulham; Brent; Harrow; Hillingdon; Hounslow; Richmond Upon Thames; Kingston Upon Thames; Wandsworth; Enfield; Kensington and Chelsea; Barnet; Camden; Westminster; Islington; Haringey – G4S
  4. London East – Hackney; Newham; Tower Hamlets; Barking and Dagenham; Redbridge; Havering; Waltham Forest; City of London; Croydon; Bexley; Lambeth; Bromley; Greenwich; Lewisham; Southwark; Merton and Sutton – G4S
  5. North East Northumbria – South Tyne and Wear Valley; Tees Valley – Pertemps
  6. North West 1 – Cumbria and Lancashire; Merseyside; Halton – G4S
  7. North West 2 – Greater Manchester Central, Greater Manchester East and West, Cheshire and Warrington – Seetec
  8. Scotland – Ayrshire, Dumfries, Galloway and Inverclyde; Edinburgh; Lothian and Borders; Forth Valley, Fife and Tayside; Glasgow; Highlands, Islands, Clyde Coast and Grampian – Learndirect
  9. South East 1 – Hampshire and Isle of Wight; Thames Valley (Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire) – G4S
  10. South East 2 – Kent; Surrey and Sussex – Seetec
  11. South West 1 – Devon and Cornwall; Dorset and Somerset – Rehab
  12. South West 2 – Gloucester, Wiltshire and Swindon; West of England – Seetec
  13. Wales – North and Mid Wales, South West Wales; South Wales Valleys; South East Wales – Working Links
  14. West Midlands 1 – Birmingham and Solihull; Black Country – Seetec
  15. West Midlands 2 – Coventry and Warwickshire; Staffordshire; the Marches – Pertemps
  16. West Yorkshire – Interserve
  17. South Yorkshire – Interserve
  18. North East Yorkshire and the Humber – G4S

(From DWP press release, 28th April: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/help-to-work-nationwide-drive-to-help-the-long-term-unemployed-into-work)

 

To finish off, a link to the CWP provider guidance: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/community-work-placements-dwp-provider-guidance - Always good to know what they should be doing rather than letting them get away with making up the rules as they go along.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are mainly charities that want to keep voluntary work to volunteer's but 6 companies have since been given the "Help to Work" contract and 3 of them are G4S, Learn Direct and Seetec the other 3 want to remain anonymous so the dnt face a public back lash

 

I say name and shame them.

Once we know who these slave masters are we can boycott and bully them. Afterall thats what they are doing to us for the crime of being unemployed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know who would send you on this scheme

 

 

would this come from your post work programme coach or could it just be from anyone that signs you on?

 

will be your adviser not just a sign on person.

 

see in this work booklet for last time i signed on i put down i will sign up to more sites. can i put that down again this week?

 

as i have put down i will attend a interview and then put i attended my interview.

 

plus been told for my sign on make sure i put down what i will do for my next 2 weeks after this wed sign on day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

30hours community work placement and 4hours led jobsearch a maximum of 10 hours jobsearch must be evidenced and recorded must say am not sure how i will do 10hours job search when u will be doing 30hours work basically 40hours jobsearch and working all for a £50+ a week that is the worst part its not even a lot of money we get paid

Link to post
Share on other sites

will we still have to sign on during the cwp as we will probably be on the cwp monday to thursday for eight hours with a half hour break so 7.5 X four days = 30 hours

 

the supported job search will probably be on a friday for four hours where the provider could check we have done the ten hours and applied for jobs etc,

 

so thus would give us very little time to get to sign, Also this would be very similar to the old new deal work placement scheme which was for 13 weeks but no signing during that time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...