Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Similar to what you've said here, just get drafting up based on what's already been sent. The mentions of the CRA2015 will be key. post your draft up here and we can help tweak.
    • Yes, well done. If you have a look at post 9 of dbuk2000's thread there are links to other cases featured on the Parking Prankster's site  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466177-ukpc-2x-windscreen-pncs-claimform-forgot-permit-appealed-res-parking-my-own-space-east-croft-house-86-northolt-road-south-harrow-ha2-0es-claim-dismissed/#comments Also have a read of dbuk2000's Witness Statement.  
    • PDF's now merged above... Plus extra redaction!
    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EDF energy debt-Previous address


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Cagger's,

 

I need advice on a letter i received from EDF energy (to my new address),

stating that i owe them £3500 for electricity at my previous address

and if i do not contact them then they are instructing debt collector's.

 

I was living in my previous property (private landlord) for 2yrs and 6 months,

during this time, i assumed my electricity was included in my rent.

I never once received a bill from EDF during the whole 2.5 years and my electricity was never cut off!

 

Since receiving this letter, i have checked my old TA and it doesnt say my rent included electricity, just water rates.

 

I am shocked to recieve this huge debt and i guess i am responsible for it,

however, i never once took a meter reading, so i am not sure how they have calculated my useage.

 

What can i do to dispute this debt please?

Why didnt they cut my supply off after non-payment of the first bill?

I didnt even recieve any red bills either.

 

Isnt it very irresponsible of them to let it accumilate to such an extortionate amount.

If they had sent bills or even cut it off after non-payment,

then i would have realised that the electric wasnt included in my rent but i received not a single bill in 2.5 year's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you leave the premise..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can instruct all the debt collectors they like

they are not bailiffs.

 

strange how the suddenly find you after all this time..

 

as far as I can see they can only back date 12mts

and theres no debt within 12mts....so

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that EDF have been chasing the landlord for quite awhile, as after you moved out in June 2014, it is quite possible new tenants tried to sort out paying for energy usage. EDF then realised they had not been paid and eventually the landlord supplied them with a copy of your tenancy agreement. You have then been traced to your current address.

 

Suggest you check on Trustonline that a CCJ has not been obtained using your last addresses.

 

Search online for details of the 12 month backbilling rules for energy supplies. You might have to negotiate paying something towards energy usage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The back-billing principal only applies when you have told energy supplier that you have moved-in and gave a start reading and the energy supplier has failed to bill you,

 

 

then you have told the energy supplier that you have moved out with a final meter reading and the energy supplier failed to bill you then later comes forward with a large bill for the full tenancy term

 

confusedbunny : Assumed the electric was included within the rent and never contacted the energy supplier, then the back-billing principal does not apply and the £3500 bill remains

Andrew

ASI Industries = As i in does tries!

 

As i in does tries!: My definition.

I will try, i may never succeed in the goal, but at least by trying i have a greater chance of success than never trying at all!

 My opinions are my own & occasionally may offend, but it is not my intention to cause offence in the first place!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

and what did it say about services?

 

 

You state that LL responsible but if the tenancy didnt say that

then you will struggle to persuade EDF to go away

 

 

I would tell them that you were never their customer either by a contractual agreement or default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.

I have received at deadlock letter from the supplier.

 

After receiving an SAR it seems i was aware of the first two quarterly bills, when i moved in nov 2011.

 

After six months, i stopped getting any bills and i left in may 2014.

 

During this time, they didnt cut me off etc and let the debt build up for over 2.5 years, not even a red/final demand bill, let alone an initial first bill during 2.5 years.

 

In the deadlock letter it states that i informed them of my new/current address when i left in may 2014, for them to contact me and i gave them a closing meter reading.

 

They state that there was an 'oversight' and was continuing to send my final bill of £3400 to my old address for two years after i left.

 

That would explain why i never knew anything about this until last month when the realised they had my forwarding address all along.

 

Where do i stand with regards to this demand please?

 

As i do not undestand the 'back billing' post given in this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they were sending bills and have all along, and it was simply that you didn't get them and was not their fault

the back billing rule cannot apply?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bottom line is what can they do to you?

not a lot bar issue a CCJ that you could defend

 

 

I think i'd let this run.

 

 

it equates to £116 PCM

which I would have thought that if you believed it was in your rent sum

the rent would have been a lot higher and you'd have questioned why?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have had a decision back from the financial ombudsmans,

they agree that I owe this debt, minus a few charges I have been credited for.

 

 

Moving forward,

taking into account that this is now a non-priority debt

(I believe I have to treat my creditors equally),

I offered a token payment (same as I pay my other creditors) until my circumstances change.

 

 

The supplier is refusing this and said they instructing debt collectors and they will take my car!

Also, he said that he is going to do one of two things and will write to me,

either:

 

1. Have my current credit meters (same supplier) switched over to payment meters (PAYG) and put the debt on there to make me pay

 

2. Have £12 per month taken from my benefit.

 

I did explain that I cannot have PAYG meters at my current address, as I am disabled.

He said why I manage to pay my bills quarterly but cant pay this debt.

 

 

I explained that my new accounts with them (at my new address) are priority debts, hence why I pay them, but that fell on deaf ears.

 

 

Also, I explained that taking £12 from my benefits is not treating my other debtors equally, he said he doesn't care and will let me know of his decision.

 

What shall I do,

pay the token payment anyway?

 

 

I am scared of the debt collectors taking my car (value £1200), I need it as I am disabled (its not registered as disabled)

 

I did plead with him to take a token payment and review it in six months but this was to no avail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

they have no legal powers whatsoever to take anything.

nada , zilch.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO no as a past debt is no longer a priority

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have their bank details,

shall I just pay my token payment to show my willingness?

 

Otherwise they are forcing me to pay them £12 (for a non-priority debt),

 

I am sure I am obliged to treat all my non-priority debts as equal when it comes to repayment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have spoken to EDF again and they stand by the decision and they are going to take the following action:

 

1. Apply to the DWP to have £3.70 per week taken from my benefits.

My other creditors (non priority) received a token payment of £1 pcm.

Are they allowed to apply to DWP without a CCJ?

 

2. They are going to convert my current meters from credit to PAYG meters

(although the debt is on a different account number and previous address),

 

 

I assume put the past debt on my new account number (at my new address) and force me to pay it as a priority debt, is this allowed?

(they are the same supplier (different account numbers) for my previous property (where the debt accumulated) and my new address (I have no debt on this account as its my priority debt).

 

Do they have the power to action either on the above?

 

 

They tell me they do, despite me explaining it is a non-priority debt now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm with you i'm sure they cant do

1,or 2

its not a priority debt

and by putting it on PAYG as a debt it becomes priority as you've no choice but to pay it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they allowed to make it a priority debt though? As it stands its non-priority. Two different account numbers too. So, effectively, they are going to merge the non priority debt onto my new account at my current address (priority debt), swap my meters to over to PAYG, is that legal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are not in debt with the latest account,

why do you not change to another supplier,

if the amount owed is under £500 you can move.

 

Then they can only chase with Debt collectors or have to go to court, or come to an agreement for payment,

 

If you do not agree to a prepayment meter the would get a warrant and pass the cost on to you, if you did not agree.

 

Change supplier is the best option imho

 

leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...