Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reassessment HCP/Maximus Report - ** PLACED IN SUPPORT GROUP **


Beddz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 or 3 days ago I sent back my questionaire with supporting evidence to the benefit office. I have just contacted them this afternoon and they have said they have sent a report off to the DWP and I do not need to have an actual assessment. I am in the Support Group since 2013 and was due for renewal is this a good sign I am not being made to have a F2F???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not 100% sure on that, so won't advise on it, but not everybody who is on ESA (SG) is called in for a F2F assessment, it all depends on the level of disability and if 'they' deem it severe or not, but like most interrogations and the crooks who sit on them they have a magic wand and can miraculously cure you of all your ills in less than an hour!

 

http://www.nat.org.uk/media/Files/Publications/Jan_2015_ESA.pdf

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it true you cannot be found fit for work unless you attend a F2F I must be so lucky not to have to go through one

 

It's not a formal rule, as such, but the DWP won't normally find you fit for work without an assessment. If they did and the matter came before a tribunal on appeal, they'd be sent packing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It literally took them less than 24 hours to create the Maximus report and send my file back to the DWP stating I do not need a medical. I did send in alot of evidence with my ESA50 and this is a reassessment, surely it must be good news if I'm not having a F2F

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a formal rule, as such, but the DWP won't normally find you fit for work without an assessment. If they did and the matter came before a tribunal on appeal, they'd be sent packing.

 

Excellent bit of knowledge to file away... :thumb:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It literally took them less than 24 hours to create the Maximus report and send my file back to the DWP stating I do not need a medical. I did send in alot of evidence with my ESA50 and this is a reassessment, surely it must be good news if I'm not having a F2F

 

I would take this as good news and be very surprised if it isn't - though stranger things have been known. Maximus could have taken over ATOS' role as miracle workers for example.

 

It may be that there are still quite large backlogs, particularly for reassessments, so any they can possibly manage without a face-to-face are probably a bonus to them. It really reinforces the need to send good supporting evidence and as someone who is due to be reassessed next month, I've been collecting mine for months, helped by having only just done the PIP transfer.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really reinforces the need to send good supporting evidence, I've been collecting mine for months, helped by having only just done the PIP transfer.

 

You're not wrong there, I know better now not to just fill in their ESA85 and expect them to decide on that alone, I've got three years worth of legal arguments to send them later on this year when my interrogation comes up for renewal.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In a similar situation. I'm sure the HCP said their report would be sent to DWP the same day the WCA was completed but DWP insist they haven't received it yet which is really odd. I thought ATOS/Maximus and the DWP communicated electronically on this. DWP's basically saying I just need to stew until they get back to me with their decision.

 

 

 

 

My file was sent back to the DWP on the 15th of January still they haven't received it according to there systems... Surely thats odd nearly 2 weeks since its been sent off
Link to post
Share on other sites

In a similar situation. I'm sure the HCP said their report would be sent to DWP the same day the WCA was completed but DWP insist they haven't received it yet which is really odd. I thought ATOS/Maximus and the DWP communicated electronically on this. DWP's basically saying I just need to stew until they get back to me with their decision.

 

Luckily I didn't have to attend a WCA for this reassessment as I submitted enough evidence and the questionnaire they've asked me to ring on Monday to check for an update and if nothing has changed they will escalate it and chase it up asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm too laissez-faire, but I wouldn't expect to hear anything back from anyone after less than a fortnight tbh. I sent my esa50 reassessment form back to Maximus Hoopus Jumpus for a deadline of 15th Jan. Not heard nowt. Mind you, it did take four years to finally get allocated the support group in the first place, so here's hoping things'll be a tadge quicker this time round ... :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my decision over the phone staying in the Support Group until 25th January 2017 so happy wish it was a 2 year award for a better piece of mind but overall I can't complain thanks everyone on this forum for there advice and help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news WELL DONE!!

 

It's such a relief isn't it, I could've slept for a week when the judge ordered them to place me in the SG.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had my WCA on the 5th of January and after reading all the stories I was ready to be told they had ruled against me but was pleasantly surprised to receive a letter saying I had been put in the support group I'm not sure why I qualified or how long it is for but it has taken a load off my shoulders and will allow me time to recover in as far or as much I can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was curious as said by some this may not be the norm (about getting put in SG without F2F) but is it any point sending in supporting evidence before WCA in hope of getting placed in wrag or sg or is it prob only if deemed severe enough by DWP

 

It may ultimately make no difference to whether you have a F2F or not, but in general the more supporting evidence you can supply the better your chances of being awarded ESA without going through appeals.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was curious as said by some this may not be the norm (about getting put in SG without F2F) but is it any point sending in supporting evidence before WCA in hope of getting placed in wrag or sg or is it prob only if deemed severe enough by DWP

 

If you don't send supporting evidence, then you run the risk of having a three year fight to be placed in the correct group like I did.

Won't be making that mistake again!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I sent quite good evidence with my last ESA50 but they still insisted on a F2F. Beats me how they decide whether a F2F is required. I really don't know though whether sending that evidence helped my case in other ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...