Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Whatever Happens, really ???


djionics
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so ill make this short and sweet with this story.

 

Buy 42" lcd tv 6.4 years ago cover it at 7.99 a month on whatever happens

 

TV on off button starts playing up.

 

Ring up get tv picked up.

 

Two days later call from someone saying TV written off, vouchers sent to replace.

 

Vouchers arrive for £400. Look for a TV that will suit/replace the one we had.

 

Now we hit problems.

 

Old TV spec was that it has 2 hdmi and 2 scarts + other specs that are available now but not on the cheaper end or @ £400.

 

So we argue/speak with a Duty manager at a currys store. He will look into increasing the vouchers (even though I had already spoken to someone on the phone and been told its a store managers discression/decision.)

 

Anyway leave a day or 2, get back to Duty manager who has now passed on all the details to someone in the stores KnowHow team. So I agree thats fine and agree that I will definately get a call today from them. Waited till 3.30pmish and think ok I will just ring instead. ROFL, the person isnt even scheduled to work today so how was I going to be rang back when I have evidence that I was promised to recieve a call ?

 

Here are a few question maybe others can answer for me.

 

When I took out the 7.99 a month cover for my TV what was the value of the good (TV) that this covered as there new policy are £ 6 7 or 8 a month and 8.00 covers TV to the value of £1000-£1250 (as per the T&C on there website).

 

In the small print there is nothing that says you as a customer may refuse the amount offered, or they at no point state that you agree to any decision they make. So as I stated to the Duty Manager, I do not except the offer of £400 and therefore would like my TV returned to me and then I purse it in a different way. They explain that this isnt possible. So who owns my TV ??? isnt it my decision if they offer to replace my goods that I am fit to ask for it to be returned so I can get rid of it in my own manner ? (hope that makes sense).

 

What is "LIKE for LIKE" or what does it constitute when it comes to TV's Size, make, spec etc etc

 

Cause all the Duty Manager was going on about is my old 42" was HD ready so ANY fullHD TV of same size is better, nothing else but that 1 spec.

 

Really getting annoyed now and soon will start other approaches to get this sorted instore as that can be very pro-active when you start making a noise inside and outside of a store ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So over the 6.4 years you have paid them £607.24 for insurance ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it does work out at that amount and is one of the reasons I am fighting the offer.

 

1) The TV originally was a deal I done with the store manager at the time.

I bartered a whole package of Philips 42" lcd TV + Home Theatre surrond system and a stand for £949.00

This deal wasnt instore or even on a website afaik.

The offer was for the TV and Home theatre.

 

From memory the TV originally retailed at £1200 ish when it 1st came out,

So the offer of a TV + the £330 valued Home Theatre was a great deal already

but I pushed the boat and said to the store manager id do the deal if he could add the stand for free.

 

2) From what I recall of the original deal of TV/Home Theatre it was buy the TV get the HT free.

 

3) If the 7.99 covered the cost of the TV (value to replace) I was told that it would be £1000+ (ie original price).

this is/has been one of my questions, what was the 7.99 valued at goods at the time.

If it was for good of 1000-1250 as per the new £8 KnowHow policy does then was I possibly mis-sold the wrong cover for that TV ?

 

4) What what makes me laugh is the duty manager said

"if you had a peugeot 206 and we offered you a 306 as a replacement you would take it"

IE you had HD Ready your being offered Full HD.

But I have just realised the flaw in this.

 

"If I crashed my Mini, and was offered a Fiat, do I need to take it ?"

 

In my eyes if they no-longer sell the make or spec then I have more rights to say

what Id require as a min replacement not what they feel matches there like for like policy ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

diff one

 

as your statutort right play no part here.

 

however, I would press home the fact that theavailable tv'sfo rtheat price don't not have the same connections that you need.

thus rendering other equipment 'unusable'

that's a bit unfair tome.

 

I would not go waving ones arms around outside though.

if you don't get your way.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not saying I will go and annoy them at the store, but once I had faulty 3 piece suite from World of Leather and while in store, wife was talking to the manager and I just started walking round the store and talkng to people and warning them about my experience.

 

They soon wanted us to leave, and after 1 replacement which I then refused I got a full refund.

 

Not the same as the above, but sometimes, showing that you can be pro-active can annoy and its sometimes easier for them to actually help than not help which seems to be the way atm with Currys.

 

Lets see if the call from there "knowhow" people finally arrives. But I still need answers about being mis-sold a policy etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

OH a new update from Currys,

 

I have been advised to put in a complaint saying they no longer stock a TV that would meet my specifications that I brought my original TV for.

 

So did that and awaiting a reply from that.

 

But at the same time I went through to Currys KnowHow Agreements team and after a chat

and explaining what I need and what Currys dont have.

 

I used a great way of saying things,

I explained to the guy if you brought a 1000cc Car (no matter the make or model its 1000cc),

but that breaks and you are then told thats fine we're replacing it with a 1100cc vehicle

and you agree only to find that you now get given a motorbike,

it dont quite meet all the specs you had origanally other than a better more powerful engine your knackered.

(My way of explaining how they are saying my TV for 400 would be better cause it would be full HD not HD ready like my old one).

 

I then get told by the guy that I should find TV's either in other stores or online (that are brand new) that would fit my specification.

 

So far I have found a 37" TV with 2 scarts and a 40" with 2 scarts all be it they are a bit old (not as old as mine was)

but they are band new and available to buy.

 

But if anyone knows of a place that may sell a 42" with 2 scarts and 2 HDMI's min

and are brand new id love to know so I can get even more of a price guide to give to them.

 

Will see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree not many 2 scart TV's about, hence why I am looking for them to prove the exsist. They might be older stock etc etc. But if you had origanally spent £950 and get told to watch A you use the remote to change to scart to watch B you need to stand up switch this and then you can watch.

 

Im sorry if it sounds picky, but I am more annoyed with the whole situation. How a TV gets written off for a button being faulty ? or cause currys dont stock that brand anymore ? Also the definition of like for like is being abused by Currys and therefore I wish to get as much as I can. Also the feeling that I was mis-sold a policy that wasnt worth the paper it was written on is also something I have learnt. So yes a switch maybe the answer but that has not even been suggested by a so called expert in Currys in all the time I have been dealing with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know of any 2 scart TVs, and I doubt they exist, if they gave you a two grand tv or even 20k one, they still would not have two scarts. If it doesn't exist they can't give that to you. The policy cannot protect against future advancements in technology. What are you using that requires two scarts anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Currys dont sell them :/

 

So how can they sell you them or add vouchers to that value to spend instore ?

 

Oh and now that I have spoken to someone in agreements and gave 3 examples of "Brand New" TV's that do offer 2 scart sockets and other spec that my original TV had they have passed all the information onto the claims investigation team.

 

Even if they come back and suggest a scart splitter how can they offer you vouchers to cover the cost of purchase if they as a company dont even sell them ?

Edited by djionics
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know of any 2 scart TVs, and I doubt they exist, if they gave you a two grand tv or even 20k one, they still would not have two scarts. If it doesn't exist they can't give that to you. The policy cannot protect against future advancements in technology. What are you using that requires two scarts anyway?

 

My old tv had 2 scarts. Use HDMI now.

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was going to suggest a scart to hdmi convertor but ive just seen the price....

 

i have to say you would struggle getting multiple hdmi ports on a telly now

mine has no scart sockets but a expansion port took a scart adaptor, is it worth asking if any of the other tellys come with that?

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a technical name for the expansion port ? or even a pic at least then I could have an idea :) Thx.

 

Lol makes you laugh lady dealing with my case has told me there is NO way they can check if I was sold the right policy at the time. Ie The value of the TV at the time of purchase (not the total purchase at the time) vs the £7.99 policy. The reason I asked for this information is that from reading this forums and others many much more expensive TV brought around the same time as me was as on the 7.99 policy. I am now even more worried about people who are buying into "KnowHow" policies as there is so much grey area I wont be making the mistake again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mines a toshiba 42vl863b not sure what the technical name for the connector is, its just a single jack port that came with about 4 cables one converts it to the 3 seperate cable inputs, one converts it to another hdmi, another converts it to scart, forgot what the last one was

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I have been waiting for a reply from anyone from Currys (ie a phonecall, email). But while this has all been happening I have tried to speak to someone from Currys on facebook. Finally I have had a reply after I gave them some info. What does anyone make of this :

 

Hi Sir, sorry to hear that you think we are being rude. Please accept my apologies that we have very high work volumes and we respond to everyone as quickly as possible. Having looked into your agreement I can confirm the price of your TV was £613.16 and the agreement was £7.99. Currently the TV if purchased at that price would be set at £6.99 per month. I am sorry that we hold no information after all this time on the levels that were in place at the time. - Lloyd.

 

 

Now I have a problem, does that mean I was mis-sold (ie put into the wrong monthly payment) for the whatever happens policy or is he saying if exsisted today id have to pay 6.99 ?? The reason I ask this is because no actual policy (at that price exisist there £6 7 8 exactly). And they dont seem to be able to say they have any info to say yes I was or no I wasnt mis-sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woohooo just been called by Curry finance team and after a quick chat have settled on a cheque being sent to me to the value of £800. This will cover me to get a new TV with the specs that they dont not have at this time in a Currys store. Nothing was said about the mis-selling of the policy origanally but I have weighed up both the value of the TV and the value of the policy and feel this is a fair deal and a great victory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...