Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I need to get a hamster. lol
    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

work programme after 2 years


bcham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3405 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The government are saying 130,000 people have found work through the work programme ?

 

Have a listen to what they say about ESA and WP

 

http://www.channel4.com/news/work-programme-targets-government-mark-hogan-video

 

I noticed the government never answered this question, Are theses jobs full time, part time and how many of theses people are still in work after 6 months !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The government are saying 130,000 people have found work through the work programme ?

 

Have a listen to what they say about ESA and WP

 

http://www.channel4.com/news/work-programme-targets-government-mark-hogan-video

 

I noticed the government never answered this question, Are theses jobs full time, part time and how many of theses people are still in work after 6 months !

 

They had a target of 16% of ESA people on the WP to find sustainable work yet people in ESA have limited capability of work and are supposedbly not have any mandatory work placements. That ESA target seems ridicously high when compared to the JSA target.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They had a target of 16% of ESA people on the WP to find sustainable work yet people in ESA have limited capability of work and are supposedbly not have any mandatory work placements. That ESA target seems ridicously high when compared to the JSA target.

All targets seemed perfectly reasonable when the Welfare To Work Sector negotiated the contracts, and were designated as Minimum Performance Targets - and were clearly accepted as being Minimum Performance Targets at the time and easily exceeded, generating £Millions in Bonus Payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All targets seemed perfectly reasonable when the Welfare To Work Sector negotiated the contracts, and were designated as Minimum Performance Targets - and were clearly accepted as being Minimum Performance Targets at the time and easily exceeded, generating £Millions in Bonus Payments.

Quite! A4e were even paid to help design the WP! So they got money to help design a system that they could profit from.

Now they seem to want to complain that the system isn't fair because they can't make enough cash out of it.

You wouldn't make this up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is why there is a wide turnover of staff - they were employed on a relatively lower wage, with promised performance bonuses. as they have not performed, they do not get them, and are saddled with around 200 'clients' each.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone who already participated in the 1st tough meeting at JCP after WP give us the following information:

- JSA Agreement you are imposed to sign (ideally scanned copy), the point I would like to know is if there are any different clauses compared with the existing one

- DWP's announcement on 31 May says "At their first appointment they will have to agree a binding back-to-work plan laying out what they are required to do.", is there any fixed format or legally binding form for the back-to-work plan apart from the new JSA Agreement?

- 1 person talked about 35 hrs job search which another person said it hasn't been legislated though, according to Securing Your Rights on Welfare to Work(fare) site (I'm not yet allowed to attach its link) it looks already done, does it apply only when Universal Credit starts? Is there anybody who are told 35 hrs is mandatory?

 

Thanks.

 

May

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first is on the 4th July (2013)- I will post what ever happens on here afterwards.

 

I have yet to receive a call from my WP provider, about collecting a copy of my WPER1, but it has only been 14 since I finished it. I will raise the matter with the DWP, to see if they have had their copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went for an interview yesterday and he wants me! I have another interview nearer to home on Monday. I am panicking now about not having any money for the month and the length of time it takes to sort Housing Benefit with the council. I have the budgeting loan application here shall I apply for money to cover me for the duration of the month, I need to get to the job and its costing £10 for bus/train. I won't be able to get to the job or eat etc as they have stopped the run on for benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LonghairedLily...First....Congrats on the job well done.......if you are still on the WP ask them for help with a months travel expenses to help you out...they used to help with that, they did when I found myself a temp job, if you are signing off i'm not sure if you will be able to apply for the budgeting loan, as that I thought was for when you are claiming benefits, (I may be wrong) see about working tax credit (if you are entitled to it) as that will help you out while you wait for your first pay packet, . I'm sure others on here can help you out more with what you are entitled too. Good Luck with job :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lorise,

 

I have another interview on Monday with another firm and I will make a decision then, no start dates been mentioned. I was think if I put my budgeting loan in on Monday I know it takes 2 two weeks to go through, odds on I won't have started by the time it comes through. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They had a target of 16% of ESA people on the WP to find sustainable work yet people in ESA have limited capability of work and are supposedbly not have any mandatory work placements. That ESA target seems ridicously high when compared to the JSA target.

 

Yet when you listen to that channel 4 news clip.

 

0% on ESA WRAG have found a job !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lorise,

 

I have another interview on Monday with another firm and I will make a decision then, no start dates been mentioned. I was think if I put my budgeting loan in on Monday I know it takes 2 two weeks to go through, odds on I won't have started by the time it comes through. ?

 

Yeah good thinking get any last bit of money out of them while you can...although once you start work you will have to pay it back maybe at a higher rate then if you were still on benefits (again I am not sure)..some help I am haha , good luck with 2nd job interview...hope you make the right choice for you between what job you take again Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.although once you start work you will have to pay it back maybe at a higher rate then if you were still on benefits (again I am not sure)..

 

I'm not sure but from my experience with the SLC if you pay something towards it there isn't much they can really do about it unless they take you to court, and that would be unlikely if you are paying something in line with what they take off your benefit (about £7 per week)

 

And of course will have a period in between starting work and when they write to you to tell you you have to pay it, so you can save up a bit then and stagnate the payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP have produced a load of documents spelling out what exactly should happen to the WP returners. Thanks to J Roberts and Freedom of Information these can all be read from here:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exit_reports_hit_squads_and_the#incoming-403920

I found the PWPS Guidance v3 13 05 29.pdf particularly useful and also the training given to DWP advisers Learning for WSD frontline staff v4 0 2013 05 31.ppt

Be one step ahead of them - do a bit of reading.

 

Basically it is up to the adviser to sort the sheep from the goats. The goats being those with no recent work experience etc. who are consigned to the Mandatory Intervention Regime (MIR). During the trailblazer this was known as "Ongoing Case Management". Basically it's the "hit squad" approach.

I quote:

 

PWPS will introduce a new element for JSA claimants called the Mandatory

Intervention Regime

 

 

 

(MIR)*. This is for claimants who have multiple barriers to work,

including motivational issues and/or a

 

 

 

lack of recent relevant work experience.

The sheep get sent back for normal JCP processing.

Be warned though:

The majority of JSA completers will be assigned to the MIR group, receiving

a more intensive offer of flexible and personalised adviser based support.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(MIR)*. This is for claimants who have multiple barriers to work, including motivational issues and/or a lack of recent relevant work experience.

The vast majority (all ?) claimants are likely to fall in to this category thanks to spending (wasting) two years on the WP in addition to the twelve months qualifying period. Perhaps the saving grace is the number of people coming back in to the system after serving time with the providers. With cutbacks in the Job Centre, and an influx of some 60,000 ex-WP claimants each month, methinks they are going to struggle to cope - If the DWP are planning on dragging these people in on a weekly (or even daily) basis with the staff and resources currently available, one can only imagine the farce it will turn in to.

 

Don't forget folks: If the DWP are mandating you to attend outside of your normal signing on day, claim back your travel expenses in full.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They always gave me a bus pass for my next appointment with a4e. OTOH my mate who is with Igneus doesn't get any.

 

You mate really needs to kick up a stink about that if he is presenting bus tickets for a refund - Complaints should be addressed to Ingeus head office AND the DWP. Make 'em pay. It is your right.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mate really needs to kick up a stink about that if he is presenting bus tickets for a refund - Complaints should be addressed to Ingeus head office AND the DWP. Make 'em pay. It is your right.

 

I just emailed him. He has been kicked off the dole as well, because he was in hospital earlier in the year and didn't register as ill with the JC which generated the sanction. Maybe he can claim his travel from them to keep him going because he has no money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP have produced a load of documents spelling out what exactly should happen to the WP returners. Thanks to J Roberts and Freedom of Information these can all be read from here:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exit_reports_hit_squads_and_the#incoming-403920

I found the PWPS Guidance v3 13 05 29.pdf particularly useful and also the training given to DWP advisers Learning for WSD frontline staff v4 0 2013 05 31.ppt

Be one step ahead of them - do a bit of reading.

 

Basically it is up to the adviser to sort the sheep from the goats. The goats being those with no recent work experience etc. who are consigned to the Mandatory Intervention Regime (MIR). During the trailblazer this was known as "Ongoing Case Management". Basically it's the "hit squad" approach.

I quote:

The sheep get sent back for normal JCP processing.

Be warned though:

Whereas JCP Front Line Advisers may have been promoted into a role, where they may delude themselves with the belief that they can separate "Sheep" from "Goats", the likelihood is that they will not be Professional Careers Advisers and are unlikely to possess any higher level of competence than any other JCP Front Line Adviser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read that little lot..some very intimidating 'turns of phrase' used, for example a section telling you about sanctions has the line 'This is just to let you know what might happen to you in the future'. Veiled threat or what!

 

The line about 'activities must be reasonable' will be one which we'll be using a lot, I think.

 

I'd recommend everyone read this lot and have copies with them at their initial interview - even if just to warn the JC advisor that we know what they know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are they trying to get people on ESA WRAG into work when thye've been found unfit for work?

 

More money for them and someone is signed off ESA WRAG

Unfit for work is a term many avoid even if you are dying or stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...