Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3658 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My name is jack, i am using Snowy`s membership to post some questions as i now have no internet access due to the cost & being unemployed. If this is a problem then could the moderators please inform Snowy & we can try a different route. Snowy is present as i type this .

 

OK, please bear with me as i have had an awful experience this morning while signing on.

 

I signed on this morning with my normal advisor, who is a nice lady but very unsure of procedure & very vague when asked questions [ i will come to this] . She asked me about UJM & signing up , i gave my stock answer that as i am applying for 10-15 jobs per week & have had 3 interviews within the last fortnight & i have a second interview tomorrow , is there really any need for me to join?, as it it obvious my job search is successful & above the required 3 job application per week.

She did`t answer but did`t push the subject any further, she then informed me i was required to attend a meeting to discuss my job search next week. I politely asked " why & for what reason" , she replied that it was to help me in trying to obtain a job," but i have had 3 interviews in the last fortnight & i am attending a second interview tomorrow so why do you think i need any extra help" . This sent her into a complete tizzy, she went to the supervisor who is a vile woman & is full of the attitude that you will do as you are told. She "told" me i must attend, i said OK but can you give me the official legislation that states i must attend an interview or send me a letter to that effect. she once again "told me, that it is part of my job seekers agreement", again i asked to be shown the relevant paperwork , i must add, i have no problem with attending the interview but i don`t like being spoken to like i am a subordinate . I had already given my advisor a tube ticket i purchased last Friday for my interview to reclaim my expense, my advisor had given me a form to fill out & said i would get the money into my account today. the supervisor stopped her processing the form & in a very abrupt manner said

" where`s your proof of the interview" , i produced a memory stick & explained as i could not afford a printer that my interview invites were all on the stick along with every job application i had ever made. She said they had no facility to download the information & i would have to produce printouts, i explained that the cost of paying for 2 rail cards & my cost of travelling to the job centre were a problem , i also explained i no longer had a car on the road due to not being able to afford the tax & insurance so i have to travel by bus , she then told me if i did`t produce the printouts i would not be paid " end of" .

 

Her attitude is disgusting, she is confrontational & i will attend the job search meeting next week, she left me with this " i can have you in here every day if i so choose" . I read that to mean, if i did`t tow the line & stop asking awkward questions then she will do her utmost to sanction me.

 

My questions are

 

Do i have to go to the added cost of printouts?, why can`t they simply look at the memory stick . what is the law on this?.

What are my legal rights regarding UJM & signing up to it.

Can i record the interview next week ? , this woman is vile & i don`t use that term lightly, she is a bully & a control freak. I want my position watertight.

 

I don`t have a problem with complying to law but i won`t be bullied or threatened with sanctions because i ask questions of the system & my legal rights.

 

Sorry for the length & any help & advice will be gratefully received .

 

Regards

 

Jack

 

 

sounds to me like she needs to get out more bless her..wait till she try's bingo, she'll hyper ventalate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My name is jack, i am using Snowy`s membership to post some questions as i now have no internet access due to the cost & being unemployed. If this is a problem then could the moderators please inform Snowy & we can try a different route. Snowy is present as i type this .

 

OK, please bear with me as i have had an awful experience this morning while signing on.

 

I signed on this morning with my normal advisor, who is a nice lady but very unsure of procedure & very vague when asked questions [ i will come to this] . She asked me about UJM & signing up , i gave my stock answer that as i am applying for 10-15 jobs per week & have had 3 interviews within the last fortnight & i have a second interview tomorrow , is there really any need for me to join?, as it it obvious my job search is successful & above the required 3 job application per week.

She did`t answer but did`t push the subject any further, she then informed me i was required to attend a meeting to discuss my job search next week. I politely asked " why & for what reason" , she replied that it was to help me in trying to obtain a job," but i have had 3 interviews in the last fortnight & i am attending a second interview tomorrow so why do you think i need any extra help" . This sent her into a complete tizzy, she went to the supervisor who is a vile woman & is full of the attitude that you will do as you are told. She "told" me i must attend, i said OK but can you give me the official legislation that states i must attend an interview or send me a letter to that effect. she once again "told me, that it is part of my job seekers agreement", again i asked to be shown the relevant paperwork , i must add, i have no problem with attending the interview but i don`t like being spoken to like i am a subordinate . I had already given my advisor a tube ticket i purchased last Friday for my interview to reclaim my expense, my advisor had given me a form to fill out & said i would get the money into my account today. the supervisor stopped her processing the form & in a very abrupt manner said

" where`s your proof of the interview" , i produced a memory stick & explained as i could not afford a printer that my interview invites were all on the stick along with every job application i had ever made. She said they had no facility to download the information & i would have to produce printouts, i explained that the cost of paying for 2 rail cards & my cost of travelling to the job centre were a problem , i also explained i no longer had a car on the road due to not being able to afford the tax & insurance so i have to travel by bus , she then told me if i did`t produce the printouts i would not be paid " end of" .

 

Her attitude is disgusting, she is confrontational & i will attend the job search meeting next week, she left me with this " i can have you in here every day if i so choose" . I read that to mean, if i did`t tow the line & stop asking awkward questions then she will do her utmost to sanction me.

 

My questions are

 

Do i have to go to the added cost of printouts?, why can`t they simply look at the memory stick . what is the law on this?.

What are my legal rights regarding UJM & signing up to it.

Can i record the interview next week ? , this woman is vile & i don`t use that term lightly, she is a bully & a control freak. I want my position watertight.

 

I don`t have a problem with complying to law but i won`t be bullied or threatened with sanctions because i ask questions of the system & my legal rights.

 

Sorry for the length & any help & advice will be gratefully received .

 

Regards

 

Jack

 

Hi Jack.

 

There's no cost to posting on CAG so as long as you have an email address you can get your own account to save any confusion about who is posting. :-)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack - if this advisor is as rude as you say then you definitely need to start recording her attitude and let her dig her own grave. The reason she's like this is because people let her get away with it. Also, you can request a different advisor; it's your right. I've done it before when one of them made a big mistake on my claim and I said either give me someone different or he (and the whole jobcentre) gets reported to the district manager. They gave me a new advisor.

 

As has been said, it's important that you show the JC that, while you're a reasonable person who will happily carry out any legitimate requests, you're also someone who knows the rules and won't be intimidated. Same goes for the Work Programme advisors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i record the interview next week ?

 

Jack - You are entitled to record any/all conversations for your own private records. If the meeting is conducted in a public area where there is no expectation of privacy, you do need to be aware that you might catch snippets of other peoples discussions (so no publishing on the internet). If the JCP/DWP/WP adviser raises an objection, insist on a private interview room and/or point them towards the Data protection Act (which makes provision for a private individual to collect data for their personal records), the Regulation of Investigative Powers (covert recording), and the usual standby, European Convention of Human Rights section 8.

 

Short answer, you have every right to record a conversation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My name is jack, i am using Snowy`s membership to post some questions as i now have no internet access due to the cost & being unemployed. If this is a problem then could the moderators please inform Snowy & we can try a different route. Snowy is present as i type this .

 

OK, please bear with me as i have had an awful experience this morning while signing on.

 

I signed on this morning with my normal advisor, who is a nice lady but very unsure of procedure & very vague when asked questions [ i will come to this] . She asked me about UJM & signing up , i gave my stock answer that as i am applying for 10-15 jobs per week & have had 3 interviews within the last fortnight & i have a second interview tomorrow , is there really any need for me to join?, as it it obvious my job search is successful & above the required 3 job application per week.

She did`t answer but did`t push the subject any further, she then informed me i was required to attend a meeting to discuss my job search next week. I politely asked " why & for what reason" , she replied that it was to help me in trying to obtain a job," but i have had 3 interviews in the last fortnight & i am attending a second interview tomorrow so why do you think i need any extra help" . This sent her into a complete tizzy, she went to the supervisor who is a vile woman & is full of the attitude that you will do as you are told. She "told" me i must attend, i said OK but can you give me the official legislation that states i must attend an interview or send me a letter to that effect. she once again "told me, that it is part of my job seekers agreement", again i asked to be shown the relevant paperwork , i must add, i have no problem with attending the interview but i don`t like being spoken to like i am a subordinate . I had already given my advisor a tube ticket i purchased last Friday for my interview to reclaim my expense, my advisor had given me a form to fill out & said i would get the money into my account today. the supervisor stopped her processing the form & in a very abrupt manner said

" where`s your proof of the interview" , i produced a memory stick & explained as i could not afford a printer that my interview invites were all on the stick along with every job application i had ever made. She said they had no facility to download the information & i would have to produce printouts, i explained that the cost of paying for 2 rail cards & my cost of travelling to the job centre were a problem , i also explained i no longer had a car on the road due to not being able to afford the tax & insurance so i have to travel by bus , she then told me if i did`t produce the printouts i would not be paid " end of" .

 

Her attitude is disgusting, she is confrontational & i will attend the job search meeting next week, she left me with this " i can have you in here every day if i so choose" . I read that to mean, if i did`t tow the line & stop asking awkward questions then she will do her utmost to sanction me.

 

My questions are

 

Do i have to go to the added cost of printouts?, why can`t they simply look at the memory stick . what is the law on this?.

What are my legal rights regarding UJM & signing up to it.

Can i record the interview next week ? , this woman is vile & i don`t use that term lightly, she is a bully & a control freak. I want my position watertight.

 

I don`t have a problem with complying to law but i won`t be bullied or threatened with sanctions because i ask questions of the system & my legal rights.

 

Sorry for the length & any help & advice will be gratefully received .

 

Regards

 

Jack

 

Your story sounds very similar to mine, see my thread I just posted, seems they are pulling dirty tricks out the bag... that's impression I get. But you are very right not to agree to do anything you DON'T have too. As long as it is not mandatory and you can't be sanctioned for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had a meeting with my advisor at the sub provider today and one of my tasks to do before my next appointment is signing up to UJM :/

 

 

oh she was trying to sell the site to me like hot cakes, acting like UJM is a revolution in job searching *yawn*, i will not be using UJM on my home computer so i'm just wondering is there anything i can present to her to say i don't legally have to use UJM at home?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had a meeting with my advisor at the sub provider today and one of my tasks to do before my next appointment is signing up to UJM :/

 

 

oh she was trying to sell the site to me like hot cakes, acting like UJM is a revolution in job searching *yawn*, i will not be using UJM on my home computer so i'm just wondering is there anything i can present to her to say i don't legally have to use UJM at home?

 

 

I don't think its mandatory yet to sign up to it?

 

I'm not sure though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

On trying to register for a gateway account, I get this:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]44502[/ATTACH]I If I enable cookies for any/all Tom, Dick, & Harry web site, it kinda works, but why should I allow unauthorised storage of cookies on my computer... Showing your WP provider a screenshot as above should have him/her scratching around for an answer.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an idle thought... Tell them "I don't have an email account" and then go on to ask for ways to sign up by post and copies of the forms required...

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't make you use it on your home computer as it needs cookies to function and they can't force cookies on you. If they insist you use it, they've have to provide you with a terminal at the JC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On trying to register for a gateway account, I get this:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]44502[/ATTACH]I If I enable cookies for any/all Tom, Dick, & Harry web site, it kinda works, but why should I allow unauthorised storage of cookies on my computer... Showing your WP provider a screenshot as above should have him/her scratching around for an answer.

 

do you have to have a goverment gateway account in order to sign up to UJM?

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have to have a goverment gateway account in order to sign up to UJM?

 

Yes.

 

 

But if you disable cookies in your browser, you get the cryptic error shown in my screenshot. :p

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had a meeting with my advisor at the sub provider today and one of my tasks to do before my next appointment is signing up to UJM :/

 

 

oh she was trying to sell the site to me like hot cakes, acting like UJM is a revolution in job searching *yawn*, i will not be using UJM on my home computer so i'm just wondering is there anything i can present to her to say i don't legally have to use UJM at home?

 

If it's a WP provider then they can't make you sign up to UJ. Mine tried that with me - even put it in the 'things to do' on my appointment letter. When he asked if I'd registered I gave him the 'only a DWP FLA can issue a Jobseekers Direction to mandate a client to register..and mine hasn't'. He just said 'Oh, that's okay then' and dropped it :)

 

I've since registered with UJ (but put nothing on it) and didn't have to create a Gateway Account, I just did it straight from the main UJ page.

 

Also, when I signed yesterday, I saw a different advisor - who I know for a fact gives out wrong advice - and I promptly corrected her when she said 'signup to UJ was mandatory across the board'. She got the same speech from me plus a few choice quotes from the PCS Union memo and she ended up stuck for words. I picked up a leaflet on 'UJ Signup' and it still said clients should tick the box to allow DWP access - absolutely no mention of the fact that this is not compulsory. Typical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a WP provider then they can't make you sign up to UJ. Mine tried that with me - even put it in the 'things to do' on my appointment letter. When he asked if I'd registered I gave him the 'only a DWP FLA can issue a Jobseekers Direction to mandate a client to register..and mine hasn't'. He just said 'Oh, that's okay then' and dropped it :)

 

I've since registered with UJ (but put nothing on it) and didn't have to create a Gateway Account, I just did it straight from the main UJ page.

 

Also, when I signed yesterday, I saw a different advisor - who I know for a fact gives out wrong advice - and I promptly corrected her when she said 'signup to UJ was mandatory across the board'. She got the same speech from me plus a few choice quotes from the PCS Union memo and she ended up stuck for words. I picked up a leaflet on 'UJ Signup' and it still said clients should tick the box to allow DWP access - absolutely no mention of the fact that this is not compulsory. Typical.

 

 

my advisor at the sub provider even said she uses UJM herself, we were discussing job sites and she said the one she finds the most easiest is UJM due to the fact you only have to press one button in order to apply and the fact it records all your activity saving you the time of writing it in your job diary.

 

i actually like and prefer writing everything ive done to look for work on my job log, gives me handwriting practice :)

 

 

is there anything in writing that i can present to them that says they can't force me into signing up to UJM?

Link to post
Share on other sites

my advisor at the sub provider even said she uses UJM herself, we were discussing job sites and she said the one she finds the most easiest is UJM due to the fact you only have to press one button in order to apply and the fact it records all your activity saving you the time of writing it in your job diary.

 

 

You still have to fill in your job log for the job centre even if you use UJM.

 

I find the jobs on UJM are about 2 days behind other job sites, yes you can apply for jobs in just one click. but that's also the same on cv library indeed reed and several others sites.

i log into my UJM every day, but i very rarely apply for jobs on there. as like i said its about 2 days behind lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is UJM website mandatory yet?

 

They keep pressuring me to sign up, To be honest with you I don't want to store any job details electronically on some system.... Charlotte how do you show your advisor you've applied for jobs? I use the job journal but they told me it's being phased out I have to do it all online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...