Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

haven holiday in blackpool


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

we complained as soon as we got there and we got £10 free bar tab and promise of cleaners comin to sort the problems which took 3 more complaints before cleaners arrived. We also had to get the couch fixed due to nails stickin up which is all documented (because health and safety went to inspect the caravan we lived in after I complained to them and send photos and video footage) and it was still in same condition. so its not that we are tryin to get free holiday or just our money back....we feel we are entitled to refund because we never got what we paid for....we never got moved to another caravan because we had 5 adults and 3 children in our party and they had limited free caravans our size apparently, and also may I state that whilst I was complainin about our caravan, 5 other couples were refusin to go back into their alloted caravan due to state of it and they got moved...then another family moved into caravan next to us on day we were leavin and took 5 mins to come back outside with all their luggage and go complain and they got moved...so I think you have the wrong opinion of why we are complainin...we complained while on holiday and straight afterwards and have kept complainin to various people. we wrote to them and sent photos etc which is why they offered free holiday only its not free cause we have to take it wen we cant, or if we take it durin scholl holidays, then we have to pay extra...so how can that be a goodwill gesture? its a bloody rip off! we want a refund and all we need is scottish address for courts to deal with...can anyone help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to know why my post was taken down.

 

Directorship details are a matter of public record and can be obtained by anyone.

 

 

There must have been good reason for this.

While you are correct in saying that PLC info is a matter for public record,by nature of that,there is no need to post specifics here as the op can look this up for his own use.

We do not encourage the use of personally naming individuals here. The exeptions are where we know the named person is actively monitoring this site,and where the person needs to be specifically mentioned following a distinct lack of info being available elsewhere.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both private (LTD) and public (PLC) company directorships are avaliable online through Companies House. The company to which this thread refers is a private limited company (LTD). I think you will find the information is not free of charge and would have cost Poochie a few quid.

 

Given that I have access to the database and was willing to take the time to make the post, I am somewhat miffed as to the great problem.

 

I am willing to accept your 'policy' of not naming and shaming people, but I don't understand it. It's not like I said anything libelous. Exactly why is it a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email addresses are one thing, but some of these people will have families and children - home addresses are a no-go area. Please don't post them here.

 

Thanks for your understanding.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I totally agree with the managements attitude. I have gone in to detail in the forum about my complaint. Basically, my compalint was against the staff but even worst was the mangements attitude and how they handled my complaint. Totally disgusted they all need to go on courses for customer care cus none of em have any. I truly hope you get compensated cus I am gonna fight all the way. Did you see their turnovers...laughable eh....cus they obviously don't take many complaints seriously. They don't deserve the publics hard earned cash.:evil:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hi

 

ive recently sent this letter to park resorts dont know if it helps at all and they have basically fobbed me off but any other advice would be helpfull too.

I am writing to ask that you refund the cost of my holiday at Cayton Bay park from 26/08/06 – 02/09/06, the amount being £605.

I would like to tell you about my utter disgust with one of your managers Dean Poppy. We recently visited your resort at Cayton Bay with my daughters and grandchildren and to say we were unhappy would be an understatement. We specifically stayed in one of your ‘Gold’ caravans as the space and shower facilities looked ideal for my Grandson who is disabled. We also have a 6 month old granddaughter and although we asked if there was room for a cot, were not informed that the only place for it to go would be in the main living area. This made it near on impossible for my grandson to get around in his wheelchair. The shower room that was advertised had a ledge that would have made it possible for him to sit down and shower. When we saw what the shower actually looked like we were outraged. Not only was it basic to say the least but it was also filthy along with the toilet. We called the manager immediately and asked him to come to the caravan. His attitude quite frankly was not what I would expect of anyone at any position who needs to be dealing with customers. After I explained the situation my daughter actually came and interrupted the conversation telling the manager that in no way did she expect anybody to talk to her mother the way in which he spoke to me. I have never encountered anybody quite so rude and extremely intimidating. When my daughter told him that her son could not shower with these facilities he replied ‘is there any reason he can’t wash?’. My daughter and her son have come across narrow minded and prejudice people ever since her son was born and this reply even shocked her. When she told him that the advert in the magazine was a misleading representation he told her that park resorts don’t even own them sort of caravans they are pictures of privately owned ones and although most of the gold standard caravans were the same as ours they were not about to put those pictures in their magazine!! We told Dean Poppy that we were prepared to leave straight away once he issued a refund so that we could arrange alternative accommodation. His reply was that a refund could be arranged through head office but it will ‘take a while’. In the meantime until we had a refund we could not get other accommodation and was not prepared to let our grandchildren miss out on the holiday we had promised them. All in all we had no choice but to stay at the resort where coincidently we spoke to many more people who had had rude conversations with Dean Poppy.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

 

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline, along with writing to the BH&HPA and the advertising standards authority.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I know its a bit late for this-cleaning contracts are tendered out-they only allow so long to clean a caravan-if you clean it properly as should be done the contractors moan like hell because the greedy xxxx just want as much as possible.They think 12 caravans a day are ok then they invent more work to do like carrying bed linen half a mile-then dont forget half a hour including walking to next caravan and bed linen-if you dont do it down to 3.00.THEY START ASKING YOU TO skip things.iF YOU HAVE STAYED THERE YOU WILL KNOW THE SIZE OF THEM.

Haven need to get a grip of the greedy contractors.

Another tip=moan like hell if caravans dirty -they will upgrade-if not satisfied keep moaning it is your holiday.

12in 6 hours-youre joking including traveling.

GET A GRIP HAVEN ITS YOUR SITE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing HAVEN -QUALITY COSTS-CUSTOMERS COME FIRST-remember if provide a good clean caravan- probably the customer will maybe tell 2 friends how good it was.If you provide half measures they will delight in telling their friends perhaps 10 of them-what a lousy time they had.I know which i would prefer -do you.Good cleaning staff have walked out because they had a conscience and wouldnt do half measures,you must know how the contractors work-its your site.Take care-tawny is watching from roost in one of your sites-guess which one.

:D

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 8 months later...
not too easy to find but here.

 

Bourne Leisure Ltd

1 Park Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 4YL

01442 230 300

 

Their turnover is 695m .....and the main director is John Dunsford:)

 

Bit out of date, but if you or any one else would like the directors email just let me know.

 

Currently in the process of complaining myself, possible update to follow in separate thread.

The retailers worst nightmare !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Still the same.The customers are great.The cleaners are still being treated like dirt.Less than min wage most weeks.Even know of one customer or one big group of customers who bought two cleaners a drink and a packet of crisps.I feel Haven havent learnt anything.The other night on tv a new director of Park Resorts(a rival site)went undercover to find out how staff and customers thought of his company,MMM-he then acted on what he learnt,thats the type of guy needed these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 7 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...