Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I have two bailiffs on my drive at the momment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two vans just arrived about 1 hour ago,

 

I have not let them in nor spoke with them.

 

I have only asked them to stop harassing us, my wife has just had to have her leg amputated and has had to retire from work due to ill health and she has asked them via a written message to stop harassing a vulnerable person.

 

Having asked them to leave our property they did not and they have stated they are waiting to get a locksmith to gain entry to an outbuilding which is my workplace. This is clearly signed in a company name and contains only materials and equipment for my business.

 

Having not left at our request we have now blocked the entrance to our property with a car.

 

What rights do they have can we park a car on our property anywhere we like!

 

What should we do.

 

Obviously early replies will be appreciated as they are here!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My wife has again just asked them to leave and stop harassing her and told her to stay in the house as they will only deal with the gentleman. I have not given them my name nor responded to them calling my name. Having asked them to leave twice what can we do as my wife is now getting upset. They have been here 2 hours and told her they have a locksmith coming in 5 minutes. Should, if the locksmith attends, I photograph them gaining entrance into an obvious business premesis.

 

Cheers for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

load of cobberes

 

they cant use a locksmith anyhow

they are bluffing.

 

ask to see i'd

 

and CALL THE POLICE

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and photograph them anyway now.

 

have you had court papers about this debt>??

 

did you know they were comingf?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the bailiff take a child's musical instrument what age is the child? did the child touch the bailiff trying to retrieve the sax, or as stated the bailiff grabbed the child? in this case the bailiff may well have assaulted your child but he may claim the child assaulted him also to gain police sympathy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you defend the Court Case with the builder? If yes, then you have very little recourse here - you'll continue to be hounded by these people unless you can prove that you don't own any assets that are either of sufficient value, or are protected items, or belong to someone (or a company) else.

If you're a sole trader, they could potentially take any materials you have that are worth anything, but wouldn't be able to take any tools. There are certain protected items for a household also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how did this pan out?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Police attended and asked me to give them goods to the equivalent of the judgement. 4 hours later 3 police and 2 bailiffs and locksmith. Ended with police agreeing with bailiffs opened the door before they drilled it. They took exercise equipment belonging to disabled wife and some equipment for my business. Walk in possession on other equipment and a two cars, one does not belong to me other used for transport to work.

 

Police stayed throughout "only to prevent a breach of the peace"

 

Bailiff issued us with a

High court enforcement group ltd notice of seizure removed and inventory

 

Judgement debt

 

Judgement costs

 

Attendance / removal costs £960.00

 

Locksmith £240.00 + VAT

 

Storage TBC

 

Are these fees chargeable the locksmith was not used.

 

Also levied two cars one used to get to work and one registered to someone else and some equipment essential to my work

Edited by Anthony22
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you point out to them the walking possession on the car that didn't belong to you was invalid? And that the car was covered under the tools of trade restraint clause on their actions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you point out to them the walking possession on the car that didn't belong to you was invalid? And that the car was covered under the tools of trade restraint clause on their actions?

 

Did, but made no difference still levied

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had some great advice from people on here, you know who you are, thank you!! though feel police are totally unhelpful basically asking us to allow them entry, can anyone comment on fees they think they will charge.

Edited by Anthony22
Link to post
Share on other sites

Had some great advice from people on hear, you know who you are, thank you!! though feel police are totally unhelpful basically asking us to allow them entry, can anyone comment on fvees they think they will charge.

 

unfortunately the police often forget they are only there to keep the peace and actively assist the bailiff, as you pointed out certain items were exempt from levy, so the whole levy is probably invalid anyway. Others like tomtubby, and ploddertom who have already assisted you will be able to clarify and point your way forward.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear this has panned out like this.

 

Going back to the very beginning I assume you knew about the original CCJ? When it wa awarded against you was it a "forthwith" Judgment or did you ask to be able to pay in instalments. If you disputed the Judgment what steps did you take?

 

Your claimant has taken the steps he has as no payment has been received and consequently had the original CCJ transferred up into a High Court Writ. It is normal practice for them just to arrive. I also assume as they have removed goods you were in no position to pay the sums asked for.

 

Thinking about some of the goods that have been removed - the equipment of your wife's was it an aid to her recovery, if so was it provided as such and along with any other items is it on finance. Were any of the goods or material removed from your workplace purchased on account or do you have clear title. The vehicle that is not yours - you must inform the owner immediately and they must file a claim that it belongs to them - they must provide proof of this.

 

Is it possible you can raise the funds to pay this off before your goods may be sold. The difficulty will be the added fees for removal & storage.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...